Object-Oriented Simulation

  • B. D. Tyreus


Steady-state process simulation is used routinely in the evaluation, selection, and design of new processes (Biegler, 1989). In the past, all the pertinent design factors could be addressed with steady-state programs. Today, however, there are new factors to be considered, and some of these have more to do with the operation and control of the plant than with steady-state aspects. For example, product quality demands, increasing safety concerns, stringent environmental requirements, process flexibility, minimization of capital expenditure through process simplification and integration, and elimination of overdesign are all important factors that tend to influence process operations. However, the operational aspect of process design is difficult or impossible to glean from steady-state simulations, and we must, therefore, consider dynamic simulations for answers.


Dynamic Simulation Generic Column Distillation Column Bubble Point Dynamic Binding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ästrom, K. J. and Kreutzer, W. (1986). System representations. IEEE Third Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design, Arlington, Virginia. New York: IEEE.Google Scholar
  2. Biegler, L. T. (1989). Chemical process simulation. Chem. Eng. Prog. 85, 50–61.Google Scholar
  3. Bozenhart, H. and Etra, S. (1989). Intelligent simulation (Mercury ISIM). Product publication, Artificial Intelligence Technologies, Inc., Hawthorne, NY.Google Scholar
  4. Cornish, M. (1987). What would you do with object-oriented programming if you had it? FYAI-TI Technical Tips 1(10), 3–12.Google Scholar
  5. Franks, R. G. E. (1972). Modeling and Simulation in Chemical Engineering. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
  6. Luyben, W. L. (1990). Process Modeling, Simulation and Control for Chemical Engineers, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Magnusson, B. (1990). European perspective. J. Object-Oriented Program. 2, 52–55.Google Scholar
  8. Mattsson, S. E. (1988). On model structuring concepts. 4th IFAC Symposium on Computer-Aided Design in Control Systems, P. R. China.Google Scholar
  9. Mattsson, S. E. (1989). Modeling of interactions between submodels. 1989 European Simulation Multiconference, ESM’89, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  10. Nilsson, B. (1989). Structured modeling of chemical processes with control systems. AIChE fall meeting, San Francisco, Nov. 1989.Google Scholar
  11. Pascoe, G. A. (1986). Elements of object-oriented programming. BYTE Aug., 139–144.Google Scholar
  12. Perkins, J. D. (1986). Survey of existing systems for dynamic simulation of industrial process. Modeling, Identification and Control 7, 2.Google Scholar
  13. Stephanopoulos, G., Henning, G., and Leone, H. (1990). MODEL.LA., a modeling language for process engineering. Comput. Chem. Eng. 14(8), 813–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Van Nostrand Reinhold 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. D. Tyreus
    • 1
  1. 1.E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.USA

Personalised recommendations