A Temperature-Decay Method for Determining Superinsulation Conductivity

  • M. B. HammondJr.
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 16)


The purpose of this paper is to describe a novel transient method for determining the thermal conductivity of practical layups of superinsulation* and to report the results of some early testing. This method has the advantage of permitting large-area sample tests for lower cost than standard methods, while allowing a range of boundary temperature conditions. Interest in advanced versions of the Apollo service module and studies of advanced Saturn boosters have common requirements for superinsulation. The Saturn uses involved liquid-hydrogen boundary temperatures, while the Apollo applications were for thermal control at near-ambient temperatures. A common test method was desired to cover the wide ranges of boundary temperatures, up to +200°F on the high side. The temperature-decay calorimeter has been used to perform tests for both applications with the result that new methods for support and attachment have been compared along with a screening of material concepts.


Test Configuration Butt Joint Sink Temperature Union Carbide Corporation Performance Thermal Protection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    N. C. Gibbon, L. C. Matsch, and D. I.-J. Wang, “A Nonsteady-State Thermal-Conductivity Tester for Cryogenic Insulations,” ASTM STP 411, Am. Soc. Testing Mats. (1967), p. 61.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    “Developments in High Performance Insulation Design, Cryogenic Subsystem Technology,” SD 68–856, North American Rockwell Corporation, Space Division (1968).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. S. Carslaw and J. C. Jaeger, Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England (1959), p. 41.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. I.-J. Wang, Aerodynamically Heated Structures, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1962), p. 101.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. B. Romero, D. W. Smith, and R. E. Dod, in: Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 11, Plenum Press, New York (1966), p. 231.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    “High Performance Thermal Protection Systems,” Lockheed MSC-A964947, Vol. 1, NASA Contract NAS 8–20758 (Dec. 31, 1969).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. E. Glaser, I. A. Black, R. S. Lindstrom, F. E. Ruccia, and A. E. Wechsler, “Thermal Insulation Systems, A Survey,” NASA SP-5027, NASA, Washington, D.C. (1967).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. H. McAdams, Heat Transmission, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York (1942), p. 57.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. B. HammondJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Space DivisionNorth American RockwellDowneyUSA

Personalised recommendations