Advertisement

Fish Vision and Applied Research

  • J. H. S. Blaxter
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 1)

Abstract

Light may be perceived by fish via the eye, the pineal and sometimes the skin. With the characteristics of direction, intensity, wavelength and period, light may be involved in many functions of life in fish (Fig. 1). Direction is probably the most useful attribute since it enables animals to perceive very precisely the direction of food, predators or other members of the species.

Keywords

Vertical Migration Gizzard Shad Floating Object Fishing Strategy Underwater Light 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beamish, F.W.H. (1967) Photographic observations on reactions of fish ahead of otter trawls. FAO Fisheries Rep. No 62, Vol. 3, 511–521.Google Scholar
  2. Blaxter, J.H.S. (1970) 2.Light 2.3. Animals. 2.32. Fishes. In Marine Ecology Vol. 1, Pt. 1. pp. 213–320 (ed. O. Kinne). Wiley Interscience, London.Google Scholar
  3. Blaxter, J.H.S. and Parrish, B.B. (1965) The importance of light in shoaling, avoidance of nets and vertical migration by herring. J. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer, 30: 40–57.Google Scholar
  4. Blaxter, J.H.S. and Parrish, B.B. (1966) The reaction of marine fish to moving netting and other devices in tanks. Mar. Res. No 1, 15 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Breder, C.M. Jr. (1959) Studies on social groupings in fishes. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 117: 397–481.Google Scholar
  6. Brett, J.R. and Alderdice, D.F. (1958) Research on guiding young salmon at two British Columbia field stations. Fish. Res. Board Bull. 117: 75 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Denton, E.J. and Nicol, J.A.C. (1966) A survey of reflectivity in silvery teleosts. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 46: 685–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hemmings, C.C. (1966) Factors influencing the visibility of objects underwater. Symp. Br. Ecol. Soc. 6: 359–374.Google Scholar
  9. Hunter, J.R. and Mitchall, C.T. (1968) Field experiments on the attraction of pelagic fish to floating objects. J. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer. 31: 427–434.Google Scholar
  10. Jones, F.R.H. (1968) Fish migration. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  11. Murphy, G.I. (1959) Effect of water clarity on albacore catches. Limnol. Oceanogr. 4: 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Parrish, B.B., Blaxter, J.H.S., Pope, J.A. and Osborn, R. (1967). Underwater photography of fish behaviour in response to trawls. F.A.O. Fisheries Rep. No 62, Vol. 3: 873–884.Google Scholar
  13. Postuma, K.H. (1957) The vertical migration of feeding herring in relation to light and vertical temperature gradient. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 1957 Meeting, Herring Cttee (Mimeo).Google Scholar
  14. Ryland, J.S. (1964) The feeding of plaice and sand eel larvae in the southern North Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 44: 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schärfe, J. (1953) Über die Verwendung künstlichem Lichtes in der Fischerei. Prot. Fisch. Tech. 8: 1–29.Google Scholar
  16. Shaw, E. (1962) The schooling of fishes. Scient. Am. 206: 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Verheijen, F.J. (1958) The mechanisms of the trapping effect of artificial light sources upon animals. Archs. néerl. Zool. 13: 1–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Walls, (1963) The vertebrate eye. New. Ed. Hafner, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Woodhead, P.M.J. (1966) The behaviour of fish in relation to light in the sea. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 4: 337–403Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. S. Blaxter
    • 1
  1. 1.Dunstaffnage Marine Research LaboratoryOban, ArgyllScotland

Personalised recommendations