Advertisement

A Behavioural Test of Rod-Red Cone Convergence in the Goldfish Retina

  • M. K. Powers
  • S. S. EasterJr.
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 1)

Abstract

The experiments described here represent a behavioural test of the physiological model of the goldfish retina, proposed by Raynauld (1972), in which rods and long wavelength sensitive cones are connected by similar, perhaps identical, neural pathways to the ganglion cells. The model was suggested by Raynauld’s observation that the ganglion cells responded in the same way to long wavelength light at photopic levels of illumination as they did to any wavelength at scotopic levels. This was confirmed by Beauchamp and Daw (1972), and supported by the anatomical report of Scholes and Morris (1973). If we can accurately predict behaviour from the cellular electro-physiology, then we can be more confident that the small number of ganglion cells that have been sampled by microelectrodes are representative of the tens of thousands whose axons carry the output of the entire retina. Moreover, a test of the model bears on current theories of underwater vision (Lythgoe, 1968; Easter, 1974), in which the long wavelength end of the spectrum is assigned special importance because of the higher contrast available there (Duntley, 1962). Perhaps the convergence of rods and red cones represents a physiological exploitation of this physical fact.

Keywords

Ganglion Cell Absolute Threshold Opponent Color Entire Retina Goldfish Retina 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beauchamp, R.D. and Daw, N.W. (1972). Rod and cone input to single goldfish optic nerve fibres. Vision Res. 12: 1201–1212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Duntley, S.Q. (1962). Underwater visibility. In: The Sea, Vol. 1, edited by M.N. Hill. Interscience: New York.Google Scholar
  3. Easter, S.S. (1974). Retinal specializations for aquatic vision: theory and facts. (This volume).Google Scholar
  4. Hecht, S., Schlaer, S. and Pirenne, M.H. (1942). Energy, quanta and vision. J. Gen. Physiol. 25: 819–840.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hester, F.J. (1968). Visual contrast thresholds of the goldfish (Camssius auratus). Vision Res. 8: 1315–1335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lythgoe, J.N. (1968). Visual pigments and visual range underwater. Vision Res. 8: 997–1012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McCleary, R.A. and Bernstein, J.J. (1959). A unique method for control of brightness cues in study of color vision in fish. Physiol. Zool. 32: 284–292.Google Scholar
  8. Otis, L.S., Cerf, J.A. and Thomas, G.J. (1957). Conditioned inhibition of respiration and heart rate in the goldfish. Science 126: 263–264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pearlman, A.L. and Daw, N.W. (1970). Opponent color cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. Science 167: 84–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Raynauld, J.P. (1972). Goldfish retina: Sign of the rod input in opponent color ganglion cells. Science 177: 84–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Scholes, J. and Morris, J. (1973). Receptor-bipolar connectivity patterns in fish retina. Nature 241: 52–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wiesel, T.N. and Hubel, D.H. (1966). Spatial and chromatic interactions in the lateral geniculate body of the rhesus monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 29: 1115–1156PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. K. Powers
    • 1
  • S. S. EasterJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Depts. of Psychology & ZoologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations