Advertisement

Prospects in the Study of Interrelationships between Vision and Bioluminescence

  • Michel Anctil
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 1)

Abstract

Bioluminescence is not only potentially detected by the visual apparatus of an animal, but it is also possible that the photore-ceptive process of this animal serves in specific cases to exert control on its own luminescent output. In recent years a large body of information has been collected on the visual and, to a lesser extent, the photogenic processes in fish. But in what ways these processes affect each other in a given set of environmental conditions remains highly conjectural. We are faced with the unconfor-table prospect of proposing integrative mechanisms for which evidence is tenuous, or absent altogether. In the present review I shall pay attention to a few selected aspects of vision and biolu-minescence in fish, emphasising their relationships and exploring some approaches that might help clarify them. Some of the topics discussed here have been previously reviewed under various perspectives (Clarke and Denton, 1962; Nicol, 1967, 1969; Tett and Kelly, 1973).

Keywords

Visual Pigment Light Organ Mesopelagic Fish Luminescent Output Luminescent Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anctil, M. (1971). A bibliography on bioluminescence in fishes. Sci. Rep. Yokosuka City Mus. 18: 1–14.Google Scholar
  2. Anetil, M. and Gruchy, C.G. (1970). Stimulation and photography of bioluminescence in lanternfishes (Myctophidae). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 27: 826–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backus, R.H., Craddock, J.E., Haedrich, R.L., Shores, D.L., Teal, J.M., Wing, A.S., Mead, G.M. and Clarke, W.D. (1968). Ceva-toscopelus maderensis: peculiar sound-scattering layer identified with this myctophid fish. Science 160: 991–993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barham, E.G. (1966). Deep scattering layer migration and composition: observations from a diving saucer. Science 151: 1399–1403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barham, E.G. (1970). Deep-sea fishes: lethargy and vertical orientation. In Proc. Intern. Symp. Biological Sound Scattering in the Ocean (G.B. Farquhar, ed.). Maury Center for Ocean Science, Washington, pp. 100–118.Google Scholar
  6. Barnes, A.T. and Case, J.F. (1974). The luminescence of lantern-fishes (Myctophidae): spontaneous activity and responses to mechanical, electrical and chemical stimulation. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 15: 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bassot, J.M. (1966). On the comparative morphology of some luminous organs. In: Bioluminescence in Progress, edited by F.H. Johnson and Y. Haneda. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. pp. 557–610.Google Scholar
  8. Beebe, W. and Vander Pyl, M. (1944). Eastern Pacific expeditions of the New York Zoological Society. XXXIII. Pacific Myctophidae (fishes). Zoologica (N.Y.) 29: 59–95.Google Scholar
  9. Bell, F.J. (1881). The eye-like spots of fishes. Pop. Sci. Rev. 20, N.S. 5, 221–234.Google Scholar
  10. Boden, B.P., Kampa, E.M. and Abbott, B.C. (1961). Photoreception of a planktonic crustacean in relation to light penetration in the sea. In: Progress in Photobiology, edited by B.C. Christensen, and B. Buchmann, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 189–196.Google Scholar
  11. Borodulina, O.D.(1972). The feeding of mesopelagic predatory fish in the open ocean. J. Ichthyol. 12, 692–702.Google Scholar
  12. Brauer, A. (1908). Die Tiefseefische. II. Anatomischer Teil. Wiss. Ergebn. deut. Tiefsee-Exped. “Valdivia”, Bd. 15. Gustav Fischer verlag, Jena.Google Scholar
  13. Buck, J. (1961). Speculations on the interrelations and evolution of photic organs. In: Light and life, edited by W.D. McElroy and B. Glass. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Md. pp. 754–770.Google Scholar
  14. Cailliet, G.M. (1972). Feeding habits and distribution of two deep-sea fishes off Santa Barbara, California. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  15. Case, J.F. and Buck, J.B. (1963). Control of flashing in fireflies. II. Role of central nervous system. Biol. Bull. 125: 234–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Case, J. and Trinkle, M.S. (1968). Light-inhibition of flashing in the firefly Photuris missouriensis. Biol. Bull 135: 476–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Church, R. (1970). Bioluminescence: the sea’s living light. Oceans Mag. 3: 20–29.Google Scholar
  18. Clarke, G.L. and Denton, E.J. (1962). Light and animal life. In: The Sea, edited by M.N. Hill, Vol. 1. Interscience Publ., New York pp. 456–468.Google Scholar
  19. Clarke, G.L., Conover, R.J., David, C.N. and Nicol, J.A.C. (1962). Comparative studies of luminescence in copepods and other pelagic marine animals. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 42: 541–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clarke, W.D. (1963). Function of bioluminescence in mesopelagic organisms. Nature 198: 1244–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clarke, W.D. (1966). Bathyphotometric studies on the light regime of organisms of the deep scattering layers. Final Rept., G.M. Defense Lab., Sea Operations Dept., Santa Barbara, California.Google Scholar
  22. Denton, E.J. (1971). Reflectors in fishes. Sci. Am. 224: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Denton, E.J. and Warren, F.J. (1957). The photosensitive pigments in the retinae of deep-sea fish. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 36: 651–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Denton, E.J., Gilpin-Brown, J.B. and Roberts, B.L. (1969). On the organization and function of the photophores of Argyropelecus. J. Physiol. 204: 38P–39P.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Denton, E.J., Gilpin-Brown, J.B. and Wright, P.G. (1970). On the ‘filters’ in the photophores of mesopelagic fish and on a fish emitting red light and especially sensitive to red light. J. Physiol. 208: 72P–73P.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Denton, E.J., Gilpin-Brown, J.B. and Wright, P.G. (1972). The angular distribution of the light produced by some mesopelagic fish in relation to their camouflage. Proc. Soc. Lond. Ser B 182: 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dubois, R. (1924). La pseudoluminescence et le role du tapis chez certains poissons. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 178: 1030–1032.Google Scholar
  28. Fraser, J. (1962). Nature adrift. The story of marine plankton. C.T. Foulis, London.Google Scholar
  29. Hanson, F.E., Case, J.F., Buck, E. and Buck, J. (1971). Synchrony and flash entrainment in a New Guinea firefly. Science 174: 161–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hastings, J.W. (1971). Light to hide by: ventral luminescence to camouflage the silhouette. Science 173: 1016–1017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Horridge, G.A. (1969). The eye of the firefly Photuris. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser B 171: 445–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kay, R.H. (1965). Light-stimulated and light-inhibited bioluminescence of the euphausiid Meganyetiphanes norvegica (G.O. Sars). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser B 162: 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kay, R.H. (1966). The inhibition of optically stimulated bioluminescence in Meganyetiphanes norvegica. In Some Contemporary Studies in Marine Science, edited by H. Barnes. George Allen & Unwin, London, pp. 421–427.Google Scholar
  34. Lawry, J.V., Jr. (1973). Dioptric modifications of the scales overlying the photophores of the lantern fish, Tarletoribeania ere-nularis (Myctophidae). J. Anat. 114: 55–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lawry, J.V., Jr. (1974). Lantern fish compare downwelling light and bioluminescence. Nature 247: 155–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leuckart, R. (1865). Ueber muthmassliche Nebenaugen bei einem Fische, Chauliodus sloani. Ber. Versamml. deut. Naturf. Aerz. (1864) 39, 153–155.Google Scholar
  37. Leydig, F. (1881). Die augenahnlichen Organe der Fische. E. Strauss, Bonn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Locket, N.A. (1969). The retina of Poromitra nigrofulvus (Garman)-An optical and electron microscope study. Exp. Eye Res. 8, 265–275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lythgoe, J.N. (1972). The adaptation of visual pigments to the photic environment. In Handbook of Sensory Physiology Vll/1. Photochemistry of Vision, edited by H.J.A. Dartnall. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 566–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McAllister, D.E. (1967). The significance of ventral bioluminescence in fishes. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 24: 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mosely, H.N. (1887). Report on the structure of the peculiar organs on the head of Ipnops. Challenger Rep., Zool. 22: 269–276.Google Scholar
  42. Munk, O. (1966). Ocular anatomy of some deep-sea teleosts. Dana-Rep. No. 70: 1–62.Google Scholar
  43. Munk, O. (1968). On the eye and the so-called preorbital light organ of the isospondylous deep-sea fish Bathylaco nigricans Goode and Bean, 1896. Galathea Rep. 9: 211–218.Google Scholar
  44. Munz, F.W. (1958). Photosensitive pigments from retinas of certain deep-sea fishes. J. Physiol. 140: 220–235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Münz, F.W. (1964). The visual pigments of epipelagic and rocky-shore fishes. Vision Res. 4: 441–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Neshyba, S. (1967). Pulsed light stimulation of marine bioluminescence in situ. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12: 222–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nicol, J.A.C. (1958). Observations on luminescence in pelagic animals. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 37: 705–752.Google Scholar
  48. Nicol, J.A.C. (1960a). Spectral composition of the light of the lanternfish, Myctophum punctatum. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 39: 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nicol, J.A.C. (1960b). Studies on luminescence. On the subocular light-organs of stomiatoid fishes. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 39: 529–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nicol, J.A.C. (1967). The luminescence of fishes. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 19: 27–55.Google Scholar
  51. Nicol, J.A.C. (1969). Bioluminescence. In Fish Physiology, edited by W.S. Hoar and D.J. Randall, Vol. 3. Academic Press, New York, pp. 355–400.Google Scholar
  52. Nusbaum-Hilarowicz, J. (1920). Etudes d’anatomie comparée sur les poissons provenant des campagnes scientifiques de S.A.S. le Prince de Monaco. Résuit. Camp, scient. Prince Albert I, Deuxième Partie, Fasc. 58, 1–115.Google Scholar
  53. O’Day, W.T. and Fernandez, H.R. (1974). Aristostomias scintillens (Malacosteidae): a deep-sea fish with visual pigments apparently adapted to its own bioluminescence. Vision Res. 14: 545–550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paxton, J.R. (1967). Biological notes on Southern California lan-ternfishes (Family Myctophidae). Calif. Fish & Game 53: 214–217.Google Scholar
  55. Tett, P.B. (1969). The effects of temperature upon the flash-stimulated luminescence of the euphausiid Thysanoessa raschi. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 49: 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tett, P.B. (1972). An annual cycle of flash induced luminescence in the euphausiid Thysanoessa raschi. Mar. Biol. 12: 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tett, P.B. and Kelly, M.G. (1973). Marine bioluminescence. Ocea-nogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 11: 89–173.Google Scholar
  58. Ussow, M. (1879). Ueber den Bau der so genannten augenaehnlichen Flecken einiger Knochenfische. Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou 54: 79–115.Google Scholar
  59. Vilter, V. (1951). Bases cyto-architectoniques de l’acuité visuelle chez un poisson abyssal, le Lampanyctus crocodilus. C.R. Soc. Biol. Paris 145: 52–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Vilter, V. (1953). Existence d’une rétine à plusieurs mosaïques photoréceptrices chez un poisson abyssal bathypélagique, Bathylagus benedicti. C.R. Soc. Biol. Paris 147: 1937–1939.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Vilter, V. (1954a). Différentiation fovéale dans l’appareil visuel d’un poisson abyssal, le Bathylagus benedicti. C.R. Soc. Biol. Paris 148: 59–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Vilter, V. (1954b). Interprétation biologique des trames photoréceptrices superposées de la rétine du Bathylagus benedicti. C.R. Soc. Biol. Paris 148: 327–330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Vilter, V. (1954c). Relations neuronales dans la fovea à bâtonnets du Bathylagus benedicti. C.R. Soc. Biol. Paris 148: 466–469.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Young, R.E. (1973). Information feedback from photophores and ventral countershading in mid-water squid. Pac. Sci. 27: 1–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michel Anctil
    • 1
  1. 1.Département de BiologieUniversité de MontréalMontréal 101Canada

Personalised recommendations