Cryogenic Fuel Systems for Motor Vehicles
Alternative fuels for motor vehicles are needed to help satisfy the nation’s enormous appetite for transportation fuels. Cryogenic liquids—liquefied natural gas and liquid hydrogen—are candidate fuels. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is attractive for the near term, while hydrogen is projected to be “the fuel of the future.” Both cryogens offer important advantages over other fuels now in use or being considered. Both are low-polluting and have a high energy content per unit weight. Some data on pollution levels and combustion engine performance for these fuels have already been reported in the literature [1–6].
KeywordsSolenoid Valve Liquid Hydrogen Dual Fuel Support Concept Flow Control System
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Programs, “Conversion of Motor Vehicles to Gaseous Fuel to Reduce Air Pollution” (April 1972).Google Scholar
- 2.California Air Resources Board, “Project M175—Emission Test of San Diego LNG Fuel System,” Air Resources Laboratory, Los Angeles, California (February 1969).Google Scholar
- 3.General Services Administration, “A Report on the GSA’s Dual-Fuel Vehicle Experiment—Pollution Reduction with Cost Savings,” U. S. Government Printing Office, Stock No. 2205–0002 (1971).Google Scholar
- 5.R. G. Murray and R. J. Schoeppel, “Emission and Performance Characteristics of an Air-Breathing Hydrogen-Fueled Internal Combustion Engine,” SAE paper 719009 (1971).Google Scholar
- 7.U. S. Patent No. 3,487,971 (January 6, 1970).Google Scholar
- 8.U.S. Patent No. 3,905,508 (September 16, 1975).Google Scholar
- 9.J. T. Foley, “The Environment Experienced by Cargo on a Flatbed Tractor-Trailer Combination,” Sandia Corporation, Research Rept. SC-RR-677 (December 1966).Google Scholar