Abstract
In attempting to give a survey of the development of semiotics in Norway I must begin by emphasizing three points: (1) As the development of Norwegian semiotics belongs to the recent past, the very nearness of the historical scene one wishes to observe and describe makes it rather difficult to discern the historical movement and the major strands. The observer and analyst may notice what makes up and characterizes the different fields and practices among which he finds himself situated, but he can form no clearly outstanding picture of how the landscape will appear from a greater distance; (2) The nearness not only prevents him from seeing the relatively permanent trends or “schools,” but also keeps him from doing justice to scholars and their works, and picking out those worthy of mention and comment; (3) As a matter of fact, it is impossible to reduce the development of semiotics to a simple line of evolution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
René Wellek and Austin Warren, Theory of Literature (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1949).
Victor Erlich, Russian Formalism, 2nd ed. (The Hague: Mouton, 1965).
Tzvétan Todorov, Poétique, 7 (1971), 275–333.
Roman Jakobson, Questions de Poétique (Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1973).
Roman Jakobson, “Closing Statement; Linguistics and Poetics,” in Style in Language, ed. T. A. Sebeok (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1960), pp. 350–377.
Roman Jakobson and Claude Lévi-Strauss, “Les Chats de Baudelaire,” L’Homme, 2 (1962), 5–21.
See Sven Storelv, “Les Chats de Baudelaire (Fleurs du Mal LXVI) En diskusjon av diktet,” in Strukturalisme og semiologi, 2nd ed. (Oslo: Solum Forlag, 1985), pp. 43–55 (Nordisk sommeruniversitets skriftserie, No. 2, Denmark, Grenaa: GMT, 1973).
For instance, Roman Jakobson, Poetik & lingvistik, ed. Kurt Aspelin and Bengt Lundberg (Stockholm: Norstedt & Søner, 1974).
Poetik. Tidsskrift for aestetik og litteraturvidenskap (Copenhagen: Munksgaard).
Exil. Tidsskrift for tekstteori (Copenhagen: Vintens Forlag).
Kjell S. Johannesen and Arild Utaker, eds. Strukturalisme og semiologi, 2nd ed. (Oslo: Solum Forlag, 1985); Nordisk sommeruniversitets skriftserie, no. 2 (Grenaa: GMT, 1973).
Atle Kittang, Discours et jeu, Essai d’analyse des textes d’Arthur Rimbaud (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, 1975).
Alf Sommerfeit, Diachronie and Synchronic Aspects of Language Selected Articles (‘sGravenhage: Mouton, 1962). For a presentation of this linguist see Georg Morgenstierne, “Nekrolog,” Kratylos (1965), pp. 108–110.
Ibid., pp. 87–136.
Ibid., p. 134.
See Carl Hj. Borgstrom, Innføring i sprogvidenskap (Oslo and Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup Bokförlag 1958).
See for a presentation of this linguist and a bibliographical list of his works Mélanges d’études romanes offerts à Leiv Flydal, Études Romanes de l’Université de Copenhague, Revue Romane, No. 18 (Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag 1979), pp. 1–8, 13–14.
For his main contributions to stylistics see: (1) “Remarques sur certains rapports entre le style et l’état de langue.” Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap, 16 (1952), 240–257; (2) En språklig analyse av norske boktitler 1952 (Morfemene i reklamens tjeneste), Skrifter fra Norges Handelshøyskole: Språklige avhandlinger No. 6 (Bergen, 1954); (3) “Les instruments de l’artiste en langage,” Le français moderne, 30, No. 3 (Paris, 1962), 161–170.
Knut Liestøl, “Nynorsk målføring i tale og skrift samanlikna med gamalnorsk,” Maal og Minne (Oslo, 1910). 20 For studies of individual styles, see bibliographical references in the two following books: Pierre Guiraud, Stilistikk trans. Johs. A. Dale (Oslo: Det norske samlaget, 1960), pp. 86–87, and Willy Dahl, Stil og struktur (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1965), pp. 147–154.
Egil Eiken Johnsen, Stilpsykiske studier i 1890 årenes norske litteratur (Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag, 1949).
Bjørn Magnússon Olsen, ed. Den tredje ogjjœrde grammatiske Afhandling (Copenhagen: Fr. G. Knudtzons Boktrykkeri, 1884).
For these studies see Pierre Guiraud, Stilistikk, trans. Johs. A. Dale (Oslo: Det norske samlaget, 1960), p. 21.
Ibid., p. 21.
Bjarne Fidjestøl, (1) “Kenningsystemet. Forsøk på en lingvistisk analyse,” Maal og Minne (1974), pp. 4–11;
Bjarne Fidjestøl, (2) “Kenningsystemet. Gjenmaele til Peter Hallberg,” Maal og Minne (1974), pp. 9–27;
Bjarne Fidjestøl, (3) “Algirdas Julien Greimas og Ramnkjell Frøysgode,” Edda (1977), pp. 193–203.
Jakob Rosted, Forsøg til en Rhetorik (Christiania, 1829).
Willy Dahl, Stil og Struktur (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1965).
Ellisiv Steen, Kristin Lavransdatter. En estetisk studie, 2nd ed. (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1969).
Asbjørn Aarseth, Episke strukturer (Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget, 1976).
Atle Kittang and Asbjørn Aarseth, Lyriske strukturer (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1968).
Peter Wessel Zapffe, Indføring i litterar Dramaturgi (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1961).
See for the university teaching the two books of Olaf Øystebø: Stil og språkbruksanalyse (Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget, 1978), and Språklig kommunikasjon (Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget, 1979). 33 See for the contributions of the Danish scholars Nydanske studier, Nos. 1–5, (1970–1973).
Bernt Fossestol, Tekst og tekststruktur. Veier og mål i tekstlingvistikken (Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget, 1980).
See the following papers by Geir Kjetsaa: (1) “Lomonosov’s Sound Characteristics,” Scando-Slavica, 20 (1974), 77–93;
See the following papers by Geir Kjetsaa: (2) “Storms on the Quiet Don. A Pilot Study,” Scando-Slavica, 22 (1976), 5–74;
See the following papers by Geir Kjetsaa: (3) “Problema avtorstva v romane Tichij Don,” Scando-Slavica, 24 (1978), 91–105;
See the following papers by Geir Kjetsaa: (4) “Written by Dostoevski?” Scando-Slavica, 26 (1980), 19–31.
(1) Ragnar Rommetveit, Words, Meaning and Messages (New York and Oslo: Academic Press and Universitetsforlaget, 1968);
Ragnar Rommetveit, (2) “Verbal Communication and Social Influence,” in Communication and Drug Abuse, eds. J. R. Wittenborn et al. (Springfield: Charles C Thomas, 1970), pp. 69–78;
Ragnar Rommetveit, (3) “Language Games, Deep Syntactic Structures, and Hermeneutic Circles,” in The Context of Social Psychology: A Critical Assessment, eds. J. Israel and H. Taifel (London: Academic Press, 1972), pp. 212–257;
Ragnar Rommetveit, (4) “Deep Structure of Sentences versus Message Structure, Some Critical Remarks on current Paradigms, and Suggestions for an Alternative Approach,” Norwegian Journal of Linguistics, 26 (1972), 3–22;
Ragnar Rommetveit, (5) Språk, tanke og kommunikasjon. Ei innføring i språkpsykologi og psykolingvistikk (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1972);
Ragnar Rommetveit, (6) On Message Structure (London, New York, Sydney, Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, 1974);
(7) Ragnar Rommetveit and Rolf Mikkel Blakar, eds., Studies of Language, Thought and Verbal Communication (London, New York, San Francisco: Academic Press, 1979).
(1) Rolf Mikkel Blakar, “Context Effects and Coding Stations in Sentence Processing,” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 14 (1973), 103–105;
Rolf Mikkel Blakar, (2) “An Experimental Method for Inquiring into Communication,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 3 (1973), 51–68;
Rolf Mikkel Blakar, (3) Språk er makt (Oslo: Pax, 1973);
Rolf Mikkel Blakar, (4) “How the Sex Roles are Represented, Reflected and Conserved in the Norwegian Language,” Acta Sociologica, 18 (1975), 162–173;
(5) Rolf Mikkel Blakar and H. A. Sølvberg, “Communication Efficiency in Couples with and without a Schizophrenic Offspring,” Family Process, 14 (1975), 515–534;
(6) Rolf Mikkel Blakar, “Language as a Means of Social Power,” in Pragmalinguistics: Theory and Practice, ed. J. L. Mey (The Hague, Paris, New York: Mouton, 1979);
(7) Rolf Mikkel Blakar and Ragnar Rommetveit, Studies of Language, Thought and Verbal Communication (London, New York, San Francisco: Academic Press, 1979). For detailed references to the works and papers of Blakar, see the bibliographical list published by the Department of Psychology of the University of Oslo (November 1977).
See Strukturalisme og semiologi, reference citation Nos. 7 and 11.
Ibid.
Reidar Grønhaug, Micro-Macro Relations. Social Organization in Antalya, Southern Turkey (Bergen: Department of Social Anthropology, University of Bergen, 1974).
Reidar Grønhaug, “Konstruksjon og destruksjon av tegn,” in Struktur alisme og Semiologi, Nordisk Sommeruniversitets Skriftserie No. 2 (Grenaa: GMT, 1973), pp. 69–88.
See Ragnar Numelin, Fältforskareoch kammarlærde. Drag ur socialantropologiens idéhistoria (Helsingfors: Söderström & Co. Förlagsaktiebolag, 1947), pp. 243–249, and Arne Martin Klausen, Antropologiens historie (Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag, 1981) pp. 134–164.
(1) Fredrik Barth, ed., The Role of the Entrepreneur in Social Change in Northern Norway (Bergen: Scandinavian University Books, 1973);
(2) Fredrik Barth, Models of Social Organization (Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Occasional Paper No. 23, 1966);
(3) Fredrik Barth “On the Study of Social Change,” American Anthropologist, 69, No. 6 (1967), pp. 661–669;
Fredrik Barth (4) Socialantropologiska problem (Vännersborg: Prisma, 1971);
Fredrik Barth (5) Ritual and Knowledge among the Baktaman of New Guinea (New Haven: Yale University Press; Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1975).
Fredrik Barth (6) “Models Reconsidered,” in Process and Form in Social Life, Selected Essays of Fredrik Barth (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981), pp. 76–105. For an assessment of the achievement of Barth on an international level see: A. M. Klausen, Antropologiens historie, pp. 108–113; Robert L. Bee, Patterns and Processes (London: Macmillan, 1974), pp. 214–126.
Reidar Grønhaug, ed., Transaction and Signification in Human Relations (Oslo and Bergen: Scandinavian University Press, 1981).
(1) Jan-Petter Blom, “Afro-amerikanske rytmer: instinkt eller tradisjon,” in Mennesket som samfunnsborger, ed. F. Barth (Oslo-Bergen-Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget, 1971), pp. 22–35;
Jan-Petter Blom (2) “Notasjonsproblemer i folkedansforskningen,” Norveg, 16 (1972), 91–114;
(3) Jan-Peter Blom and J. J. Gumperz, “Social Meaning in Linguistic Structure: Code-Switching in Norway,” in Directions in Sociolinguistics (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972), pp. 407–434;
(4) Jan-Petter Blom, “Rytmestrukturer i folkemusikken pa Balkan, kilder og prinsipper,” in Strukturalisme og Semiologi, Norsk Sommeruniversitets Skriftserie No. 2, eds. K. S. Johannessen and A. Utaker (Grenaa: GMT, 1973), pp. 56–68.
See also the following works for the Bergen school of social anthropology: (1) Henning Siverts, “Report on Ethnographic Procedures,” Folk, 8–9 (1967), 325–334; (2) Drinking Patterns in Highland Chiapas: A Teamwork Approach to the Study of Semantics through Ethnography (Oslo-Bergen-Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget, 1973); (3) “Broken Hearts and Pots,” in Transaction and Signification in Human Relations (Oslo-Bergen: Scandinavian University Press, 1981).
For a survey of folkloristic research in postwar Norway, see Ronald Grambo, “Folkloristic Research in Norway 1945 – 1976. Ideas and Results in Profile. An Introductory Essay,” Norveg, 22 (1977), 221–286.
(1) Ronald Grambo, “Models of Magic. Some Preliminary Considerations,” Norveg, 18 (1975), 77–109.
(2)Ronald Grambo, Norske trollformler og magiske ritualer (Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget, 1979).
(3) Ronald Grambo, “Models of Metaphorical Riddles. Preliminary Considerations on Cognitive Folkloristics,” in Acta Ethnographica Academiae Scien-tiarum Hungaricae, 28 (1–4) 1979, 351–373.
See Norveg, 22 (1979), 277–278.
Ronald Grambo, “Ikonografi og struktur,” in Tradisjon og samfunn, eds. Knut Kolsrud, Bjarne Hodne, Ronald Grambo and Anne Swang (Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget, 1978), 251–272.
Adel Gjøstein Blom, “Visor i kulturell kommunikasjon,” in Föreläsninger og diskussionsinnlägg vid 21: a Nordiska etnologkongressen i Hemse Gotland 12.–15. juni 1978, ed. Arvid Bringeos and Göran Rosander (Lund, 1979), pp. 129–143.
Bjarne Hodne, Åleva med døden. Folkelige forestillinger om døden og de døde (Oslo, 1980).
See also Wigdis Espeland, “Socialt samspel i eit lokalmiljø med kjøkemeisteren som døme,” in Studiet of fester, eds. Flemming Hemmersam and Bjarne Hodne (Copenhagen: C. A. Reitzels Boghandel A/S, 1979), pp. 139–151.
(1) Kjell Døving, “Studies of the Relations Between the Frog’s Electro-olfactogram (EOG) and Simple Unit Activity in the Olfactory Bulb,” in Acta Physiologica Scandinavia, 60 (1964), 150–163;
(2) Kjell Døving, Electrophysiological Studies on Olfactory Discrimination in the Frog (Stockholm: A. B. Thule, 1966);
Kjell Døving,(3) Comparative Electrophysiological Studies on the Olfactory Tract of some Teleosts, Journal of Comparative Neurology, 31 (1967), 365–370;
Kjell Døving, (4) “Introduction to the Physiology of the Olfactory Sense,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Nordic Aroma Conference, (1972), 97–181;
(5) Kjell Døving et al., “Selective Degeneration in the Rat Olfactory Bulb Following Exposure to Different Odours,” Brain Research, 82 (1974), 195–204;
(6) Kjell Doving and Kjell Holmberg, “A Note on the Function of the Olfactory Organ of the Hagfish Myxine glutinosa,”Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 91 (1974), 430–432.
(1) Christian Metz, Essais sur la signification du cinéma, I—II (Paris: Editions Klincksieck, 1968–1972);
(1) Christian Metz, (2) Langage et cinéma (Paris: Larousse, 1971).
Pierre Schaeffer, Traité des objets musicaux (Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1966).
Ballade. Tidsskrift for ny musikk, 3 (1980), pp. 23–31.
Christian Norberg-Schulz, Intentions in Architecture (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1963).
(1) Stein Braten, Marknadskommunikation (Stockholm: Beckmans Bokförlag, 1968);
(2) Stein Braten, Mass- och miss kommunikation (Stockholm: Beckmans Bokförlag, 1971);
(3) Stein Braten, “Koding-skretsöp i symbolsk samhandling,” Tidsshift for samfunns-forskning, 14 (1973), 47–63;
(4) Stein Braten, “Model, Monopoly and Communication,” in Acta Sociologica, 16, No. 2 (1973), 98–107.
(5) Stein Braten, “Coding, Simulation Circuits During Symbolic Interaction,” in Actes du 7e Congrès International de Cybernétique (Namur: Association Internationale de Cybernétique, 1974).
(6) Stein Braten, “Dialogical Systems Approach: Dissonance, Dualities and Time,” in Sosiologi og metodologi [Sociology and Methodology] (Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo, Instituttet for Sosiologi, 1980), pp. 147–176.
Stein Bråten, Tegnbehandling og meningsutveksling (Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø; Universitetsforlaget, 1973).
(1) Daniel Apollon, The Structural Approach to the Problem of Biblical Interpretation (to appear); (2) Steps toward an Empirical Methodology of the Study of Biblical Texts as Literature (to appear).
Arne Næss, Interpretation and Preciseness, A Contribution to the Theory of Communication (Oslo: Jacob Dybwad, 1953).
(1) Ingemund Gullvág, “Definiteness of Intention,” Filosofiske Problemer, 17 (Oslo, 1955); (2) “Criteria of Meaning and Analysis of Usage,” Synthese, 9, No. 6 (1954), 341–361;
(1) Ingemund Gullvág, (3) “Referanse, mening og eksistens,” Filosofiske Problemer, 34 (Oslo, 1967).
Ingemund Gullvåg, “Pragmatikk,” Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift, 1 (1980).
Ingemund Gullvåg, Charles Sanders Peirce (Oslo: Pax Forlag, 1972).
(1) Dagfinn Føllesdal, “Mates on Referential Opacity,” Inquiry, 1 (1958), 232–238;
Dagfinn Føllesdal, (2) Referential Opacity and Modal Logic (Oslo: Oslo University Press, 1966);
Dagfinn Føllesdal(3) “J. H. Mohanty: Edmund Husserl’s Theory of Meaning” (The Hague: Nijhoff 1964), Foundations of Language, 2 (1966), 266–268;
Dagfinn Føllesdal (4) “Comment on Stenius’ ‘Mood and Language-Game,’ “Synthese, 17 (1967), 275–280;
Dagfinn Føllesdal (5) “Indeterminacy of Translation and Under-Determination of the Theory of Nature,” Dialectica, 27 (1973), 255–272;
Dagfinn Føllesdal (6) “Meaning and Experience,” in Mind and Language: Wolfson College Lectures, ed. Samuel Guttenplan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975), pp. 25–44.
Dagfinn Føllesdal, “Semantik,” in Handbuch Wissenschaftstheoretischer Begriffe, Uni-Taschenbücher, No. 968, Band 3, ed. I.J. Speck (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1980), pp. 568–579.
(1) Knut Midgaard, Strategisk tenkning: Noen spillteoretiske emner (Oslo: Norsk Utenrikspolitisk Institutt, 1965);
Knut Midgaard, (2) “Coordination in ‘Tacit’ Games: Some New Concepts,” Cooperation and Conflict, 2 (1965), 39–52;
Knut Midgaard, (3) “On Auxiliary Games and the Modes of a Game,” Cooperation and Conflict, 1 (1966), 64–81;
Knut Midgaard, (4) “Some Comments on the Meaning and Use of Game Theory,” Cooperation and Conflict, 2 (1968), 108–130;
Knut Midgaard, (5) “Some Notes on Two-Person Games Where the Players’ Preference Structures Are Not Known and Cannot Be Known,” in La Décision, Agrégation et dynamique des ordres de préférence (Paris: Colloques internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, No. 171, 1969), pp. 153–173;
Knut Midgaard, (6) Communication and Strategy (Oslo: Universi-tetsforlaget, 1970);
(7) Halvor Stenstadvold and Arild Underdal, “An Approach to Political Interlocutions,” in Scandinavian Political Studies (1973);
Knut Midgaard, (8) “On the Problem of Objectivity in the Social Sciences with a Particular View to the Significance of Situational Logic,” Danish Yearbook of Philosophy (1977).
Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift, No. 1, pp. 31–41, No. 2, pp. 81–110, 111–124, Nos. 3/4, pp. 145–170, 171–189.
See reference, footnote 11.
(1) Arild Utaker, “Ferdinand de Saussure,” in Strukturalisme og semiologi (see reference, footnote 11); (2) “On the Binary Opposition,” Linguistics, 134 (1974), 73–94;
Arild Utaker, (3) “Structure et signification,” in Sémantique et logique, ed. Bernard Pottier (Paris: Editions Universitaires, 1976);
Arild Utaker, (4) “Semantics and the Relation between Language and Non-Language,” in Pragmalinguistics, Theory and Practice, ed. J. Mey, Janua Linguarum, series major, 85 (The Hague: Mouton, 1979), pp. 103–128;
(5) Arild Utaker and Kjell S. Johannessen, “E. Koerner, Ferdinand de Saussure: Linguistic Historiography and Ferdinand de Saussure (Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg and John Grubh, 1973),” Linguistics, 196 (1977), 65–82.
Arild Utaker, Pilen og bildet (Bergen: Stensilserien, Filosofisk Institutt, No. 29, 1974).
See reference footnote no. 68 (4).
For bibliographical references see Mélange d’études offerts à Leif Flydal (Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag, 1979), pp. 13–14.
Norwegian Journal of Linguistics, 29 (1974), 1–33.
Norwegian Journal of Linguistics, 30 (1976), 101–126.
La Linguistique, 11, No. 1 (1975), pp. 17–29. See also Leif Flydal, “Språkteikn og symbol i manns tale tiløyk,” Norwegian Journal of Linguistics, 18 (1957), 370–378;
Leif Flydal, “‘Formes réduites’ et ‘formes brèves’,” Norwegian Journal of Linguistics, 27 (1973), 15–23.
Leif Flydal, En spràklig analyse av norske boktitler 1952 (Morfemene i reklamens tjeneste) (Bergen: Skrifter fra Norges Handelshøyskole: Språklige avhandlinger 6, 1954).
Leif Flydal, “Paul Diderichsen, Helhet og struktur. Selected-Linguistic Papers (Copenhagen, 1966),” Studia Neophilologica, 39, No. 1 (1967), 216–224.
Leif Flydal, “Latences et liaisons en français—Systèmes coexistants ou un seul?” in Estudios ofrecidos a Emilio Marcos Llorach, 3 (Oviedo, 1978), 43–68.
In Actes du X e Congrès International des Linguistes, vol. 1 (Bucharest, 1967), 403–408.
Le français moderne 30, No. 3 (1962), 161–170.
Lars Otto Grundt and Lise Lorentzen, “Essai d’une description graphématique d’un manuscrit français du XVe siècle,” in Actes du 6 e Congrès des Romanistes Scandinaves Upsal 11–15 août 1975, ed. Lennart Carlson (Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell, 1977), pp. 11–123.
Harald Gullichsen, “Problemet form/substans i språkfilosofi og poetisk praksis,” in Fransk på norsk. Festskrift til Anne-Lisa Amadou (Oslo: Narcisse, Franskseksjonen ved Universitetet i Oslo, 1980), pp. 15–36.
Atle Kittang, Litteraturkritiske problem. Teori og analyse (Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget, 1975).
Atle Kittang, “Form, Kode, Ideologi,” in Literature and Reality. Creatio versus Mimesis, ed. Alex Bolckmans (Ghent: Scandinavian Institute, University of Ghent, 1977), pp. 22–43.
Asbjørn Aarseth, Episke strukturer (Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget, 1976);
Asbjørn Aarseth “The Idea of Freedom in Ghosts, Rosmersholm and John Gabriel Borkman,” Contemporary Approaches to Ibsen, 4 (Oslo, Bergen, Troms0: Universitetsforlaget, 1978), pp. 22–33.
Asbjørn Aarseth, “Scenisk rom og dramatisk erkjennelse i Ibsens ‘Gjengangere’,” in Dramaanalyserfra Holberg til Hoem, ed. Leif Longum (Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget, 1977), pp. 41–53.
Jean Ricardou, Problèmes du nouveau roman (Paris: Seuil, 1968).
Julia Kristeva, “Problèmes de la structuration du texte,” in Théorie d’ensemble (Paris: Seuil, 1968), pp. 298–317.
Karin Gundersen, Textualité nervalienne. Remarques sur la lettre de l’Illustre Brisacier, Diss. University of Oslo 1980.
Ibid., pp. 57–58.
Aslaug Groven Michaelsen, Den gylne lenke. Norsk litteraturutvikling og det harmoniske imperativ (Oslo: Dreyers Forlag, 1977).
Ragnar Rommetveit, Words, Meanings and Messages. Theory and Experiments in Psycho Unguis tics (New York and Oslo: Academic Press and Universitetsforlaget, 1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Storelv, S. (1986). Semiotics in Norway. In: Sebeok, T.A., Umiker-Sebeok, J. (eds) The Semiotic Sphere. Topics in Contemporary Semiotics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0205-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0205-7_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0207-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0205-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive