Mechanisms of Electromigration Damage in Metallic Thin Films

  • R. Rosenberg


Interaction between conducting electrons and thermally diffusing metal atoms causes a net drift of the atoms in the direction of electron flow. In thin films, where joule heating is minimized by substrate cooling and the temperature is relatively low, this “electromigration” has been shown to be confined mainly to grain boundaries, and, in some cases, surfaces. Because of certain irregularities in the boundary network, the flux of atoms is nonuniform, leading to divergencies and localized depletion. Depletion leads to the formation of grain boundary holes by either void nucleation and growth or by accelerated grain boundary grooving. Decrease in the damage rate is achieved by control of atomic mobility in grain boundaries and surfaces. A particularly effective method of controlling mobility is to introduce a solute species which migrates to appropriate defect sites and effectively inhibits motion of host atoms. The solute, however, being in preferred diffusion paths, is susceptible to electromigration and becomes locally depleted. Restriction of solute depletion is critical for reduction of gross damage by loss of solvent.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. B. Huntington and A. R. Grone, J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 20, 76 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. M. Gilder and D. Lazarus, Phys. Rev. 145, 507 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Chaabra, N. Ainslie, and D. Jepson, The Electrochem. Soc. Meeting, Dallas, Texas, May, 1967.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Berenbaum and R. Rosenberg, Thin Sol. Films 4, 187 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Rosenberg and L. Berenbaum, Appl. Phys. Letters 12, 201 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. J. Attardo and R. Rosenberg, J. Appl. Phys. 41., 2381 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. A. Blech and E. S. Meieran, J. Appl. Phys. 40, 485 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Rosenberg, Appl. Phys. Letters 16, 27 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Rosenberg and M. Ohring, J. Appl. Phys. 42, December, 1971.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Rosenberg and L. Berenbaum, in Proc. Europhvs Conf. on Atomic Transport (published z. Naturforsch, Germany) Marstrand, Sweden, June, 1970.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. Ames, F. M. d’Heurle, and R. E. Horstmann, IBM J. Res. and Dev. 14, 461 (1970).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Rosenberg, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. (to be published).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Rosenberg, A. F. Mayadas, and D. Gupta, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Grain Boundaries, IBM Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, August, 1971.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. D. LeClaire, Phil. Mag. 7, 141 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. R. Anthony, Phys. Rev. B2, 264 (1970).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Gordon, in Energetics in Metal Phenomena, ed. W. M. Mueller, Gordon and Breach, New York, p 205 (1965).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Gordon and R. A. Vandermeer, Trans. TMS-AIME 224, 917 (1962).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. Grünwald and F. Haessner, Acta Met. 18, 217 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. M. d’Heurle, Metal. Trans. 2, 683 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. Berenbaum and R. Rosenberg, in Proc. of IEEE Reliability Phvs. Symposium. Las Vegas, Nevada, April, 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, Inc. 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Rosenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM Watson Research CenterYorktown HeightsUSA

Personalised recommendations