Liquid Metal Embrittlement

  • N. S. Stoloff
Part of the Sagamore Army Materials Research Conference Proceedings book series (SAMC, volume 14)


Liquid metal embrittlement is a generic term which refers to at least three distinctly different phenomena. The type of embrittlement which has received most attention in recent years appears to arise from a process in which atoms of the liquid adsorb preferentially at sites of high stress concentration, leading to a reduction in cohesive energy, and premature fracture. In this form, fracture is virtually instantaneous; the path can be either intergranular or transgranular, and embrittlement is increased by increasing the grain size or lowering the number of slip systems of the substrate. A ductile-to-brittle transition similar to that manifested by body-centered cubic alloys is noted with changes in test temperature. One may inhibit or enhance adsorption-type embrittlement by a given liquid metal by means of selected solute additions to the liquid.

Liquid metal embrittlement sometimes occurs by diffusion-controlled processes such as grain boundary penetration. This type of behavior, which always leads to intergranular failure, has been treated theoretically by grain boundary wetting concepts and by a stress-enhanced dissolution model. Diffusion along boundaries may also play a role in delayed failure (static fatigue) phenomena, as there is evidence of surface notching during exposure of susceptible solids to liquid metals.

Refractory metals are subject to a corrosion-type attack by boiling mercury at temperatures greater than 600°C; this represents the third major class of liquid metal embrittlement phenomena. The interrelationship among and the distinguishing features of the various forms of embrittlement will be discussed.


Liquid Metal Solid Solution Alloy Tilt Boundary Cohesive Stress Liquid Gallium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Rinnovatore, J. V., Corrie, J. D. and Markus, H., “The Effect of Grain Boundary Penetration on the Delayed Failure of Cu-2% Be,” Trans. ASM, 59 (1966), 665–671.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huntington, A. K., J. Inst. Met., 11 (1914), 108–109.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rostoker, W., McCaughey, J. M. and Markus, H., Embrittlement by Liquid Metals, Reinhold, New York (1960).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlston, R. C., “Liquid Metal Embrittlement,” Naval Research Reviews (1965).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McEvily, A. J. and Bond, A. P., “On Film Rupture and Stress Corrosion Cracking,” Environment-Sensitive Mechanical Behavior, Gordon and Breach, New York (1966), 421–443.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pugh, E. N., Montague, W. G. and Westwood, A. R. C., “Stress-Corrosion Cracking of Copper,” Corrosion Science, 6 (1966), 345–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stoloff, N. S. and Johnston, T. L., “Crack Propagation in a Liquid Metal Environment,” Acta Met., 11 (1963), 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stoloff, N. S., Davies, R. G. and Johnston, T. L., “Slip Character and Liquid Metal Embrittlement,” Environment-Sensitive Mechanical Behavior, Gordonand Breach, New York (1966), 613–653.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Westwood, A. R. C. and Kamdar, M. H., “Concerning Liquid Metal Embrittlement, Particularly of Zinc Monocrystals by Mercury,” Phil. Mag., 8 (1963), 787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kamdar, M. H. and Westwood, A. R. C., “Embrittlement of Zinc Mono-crystals and Bicrystals by Mercury,” Environment-Sensitive Mechanical Behavior, Gordon and Breach, New York (1966), 581–609.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nichols, H. and Rostoker, W., “Delayed Failure of a Be-Cu Alloy Wetted with Mercury,” Trans. ASM, 58 (1965), 155–163.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Griffith, A. A., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, 221A (1920), 163.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gilman, J. J., Plasticity, Pergamon, New York (1960), 43.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perrone, N. and Liebowitz, H., “The Effect of Capillary Action on Fracture Due to Liquid Metal Embrittlement,” Conference on Fracture, Sendai, Japan (1965).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Westwood, A. R. C., Preece, C. M. and Kamdar, M. H., “Adsorption-Induced Brittle Fracture in Liquid Metal Environments,” Treatise on Fracture, Academic Press, to be published.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robertson, W. M., “Propagation of a Crack Filled with Liquid Metal,” Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 236 (1966), 1478–1482.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosenberg, R. and Cadoff, I., “Embrittlement of Copper Alloys by Mercury Solutions,” Fracture of Solids, Interscience, New York (1963) 607–636.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johnston, T. L., Davies, R. G. and Stoloff, N. S., “Slip Character and the Ductile to Brittle Transition in Single Phase Solids,” Phil. Mag., 12 (1965), 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nichols, H. and Rostoker, W., “Ductile-Brittle Transition in Alpha-Brass,” Acta Met., 8 (1960), 848–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thomas, G., J. Australian Inst. Met., 8 (1963) 80–90.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parikh, N. M., “Embrittlement of Solid Solution Alloys of Nickel and Palladium by Molten Lithium,” Environment-Sensitive Mechanical Behavior, Gordon and Breach, New York (1966), 563–579.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pargeter, F. W. J. and Ives, M. B., Can. J. Phys., 45 (1967), 1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nichols, H. and Rostoker, W., “On the Mechanism of Crack Initiation in Embrittlement by Liquid Metals,” Acta Met., 9, (1961), 504–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Levine, E, and Cadoff, I. B., “The Effect of Precipitation on Fracture Path in Cu-4% Ag, Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 230 (1964), 1113–1115.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Levine, E. and Cadoff, I. B., “Mercury-Induced Crack Formation and Propagation in Cu-4% Ag,” Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 230 (1964), 1116–1119.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rinnovatore, J. V., Corrie, J. D. and Markus, H., “The Effect of Exposure Time on the Embrittlement of Cu-2% Be by Liquid Amalgam,” Trans. ASM, 57 (1964), 474–481.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shchukin, E. D., Pertsov, N. V. and Goryunov, U. V., Sov. Physics-Crystallography, 4 (1959), 850.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bailey, G. L. J. and Watkins, H. C., “The Flow of Liquid Metals on Solid Metal Surfaces,” J. Inst. Met, 80 (1951-2), 57–76.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Klein Wassink, R. J., “Wetting of Solid Metal Surfaces by Molten Metals,” J. Inst. Met., 95 (1967), 38–43.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scheil, E. and Schiessl, K. E., Z. Naturforsch, 4 (1949), 524–526.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Young, S. G. and Johnston, J. R., “Accelerated Cavitation Damage of Steels and Superalloys in Sodium or Mercury,” ASTM STP 408 (1967).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weeks, J. R., “Liquidus Curves and Corrosion of Fe, Cr, Ni, Co, V, Cb, Ta, Ti, ZR in 500-750°C Mercury,” Corrosion, 23 (1967), 98–106.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Syracuse University Press Syracuse, New York 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. S. Stoloff
    • 1
  1. 1.Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteUSA

Personalised recommendations