Measuring the Dimensions of Interpersonal Communication

  • Myron Wish
Part of the Nato Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 6)


One of the most recent lines of psychological research initiated at Bell Laboratories deals with the influence which various factors have on the way people communicate and interact with each other and with the development of better procedures for measuring verbal and nonverbal aspects of communication. An important long range goal of this research on the structure and dynamics of interpersonal communication is to create a knowledge base that will be useful in planning, designing, and evaluating telecommunications systems. In this regard, knowledge about the factors influencing the process and outcome of interpersonal communication may clarify the communications requirements for different purposes and for different segments of the business and residence markets. Although it is a long road from basic research in a new area to practical applications and planning, we feel that the development of a sound foundation about the nature of dyadic and group communication is likely to be a wise investment.


Multidimensional Scaling Interpersonal Relation Interpersonal Communication Task Orientation Bell Laboratory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bricker, P. D. Modality and process: A look at overlooked looking behavior. Paper presented at Human Factors Society Meetings, Dallas, October 1975.Google Scholar
  2. Carroll, J. D. and Chang, J.-J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of Eckart-Young decomposition. Psychometrika, 1970,35 283–319.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Geller, V. J. The role of visual access in impression management and impression formation, unpublished manuscript. Bell Laboratories, 1977.Google Scholar
  4. Krauss, R. M., Geller, V. J., and Olson, C. Modalities and cues in the detection of deception. Paper presented at American Psychological Association Convention, Washington, D. C., September 1976.Google Scholar
  5. Kruskal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis, Psychometrika, 29 1964, 1–27.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kruskal, J. B. and Wish, M. Multidimensional Scaling. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, 1978, in press.Google Scholar
  7. Shepard, R. N. Analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 125–140, 219–246.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wish, M. User and non-user conceptions of PICTUREPHONE Service. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Convention of the Human Factors Society. 1975 (a).Google Scholar
  9. Wish, M. Subjects’ expectations about their own interpersonal communication: A multidimensional approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1975, 1, 501–504 (b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wish, M. Comparisons among multidimensional structures of interpersonal relations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1976, 11, 297–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wish, M. Dimensions of dyadic communication. In S. Weitz (Ed.), Nonverbal Communication, 2nd. edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  12. Wish, M., Deutsch, M., and Kaplan, S. J. Perceived dimensions of interpersonal relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wish, M., and Kaplan, S. J. Toward an implicit theory of interpersonal communication. Sociometry, 1977, 40, 234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Myron Wish
    • 1
  1. 1.Bell LaboratoriesMurray HillUSA

Personalised recommendations