Advertisement

Topics In Pattern Formation Problems and Related Questions

  • Yves Pomeau
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 280)

Abstract

Our thinking in pattern formation problems is more guided by the solution of simple models than by direct investigation of the basic equations for a well identified process. The clearest example of this situation is in instabilities of fluid flows: the Navier-Stokes equations are rather hopeless, but one can understand a lot of phenomena occuring in real flows by a reduced amplitude approach.

Those amplitude equations aim at describing the dynamics of weak fluctuations and are defined usually under restrictive assumptions: large aspect ratio (many typical wavelength), supercritical or weakly subcritical instabilities, control parameter near threshold. Dropping anyone of those assumptions leads to major difficulties linked to the summation of poorly controlled perturbation series. It seems better then to try to study simple amplitude models, with the most general structure one can think of, and to compare their predictions with real life experiments.

This is the line of thought followed here. To be a little more concrete, I shall consider first a now classical question, which is the connection between the subcritical character of the bifurcation in parallel flows and the occurence of localised patches of turbulence therein. This can be explained with a simple model of the reaction diffusion (RD) type. However this model is quite special in the sense that it has a variational structure. This entails some nongeneric qualitative properties, that are no more valid for more general system, as one expects the turbulent flows are. I shall consider some of those nongeneric properties, and refer briefly to other works on other ones. I will single out a remarkable theoretical discovery, that is the possibility of stable localised structures in a nonvariational system, although in gradient/variational systems those localised structures are always linearly unstable. Then I shall examine an application of this outside of the realm of fluid mechanics, that is the dynamics of a so-called Bloch wall in a ferromagnet. Those Bloch walls are between two magnetic domains of opposite polarization. Under the action of a convenient external magnetic field, those walls drift in a direction depending on their core structure. The time dependence in the external field breaks the variational structure of the system: in variational systems walls move to replace a state on one side of the wall by the other with a lower energy, and the direction of this motion cannot depend on the core structure of the defect.

Finally I will show how to analyse, again by using general arguments only, the dynamics of a periodic structure, as a set of Rayleigh-Bénard rolls under external stress. This makes appear a rather interesting mathematical structure, linked perhaps to the famous von Karman conjecture on the buckling of plates.

Keywords

Parallel Flow Amplitude Equation Roll Axis Front Solution Easy Plane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Y. Pomeau; Physica 23D, 3 (1986).ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. Smoller “Shock Waves and reaction-diffusion equations”, Springer, Berlin(1983).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    A.C. Newell, J. Whitehead, J. of Fluid Mech.38, 79 (1969); L.A. Segel, ibid; p.203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Hegseth, C.D. Andereck, F. Hayot and Y. Pomeau, Phys. Rev. Letters 62, 257 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    O. Thual, S. Fauve, J. de Physique (Paris), 49, 1829 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    V. Hakim, P. Jakobsen and Y. Pomeau, Europhys. letters 11, 19 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Ya.B. Zel’dovich, “Theory of combustion and detonation of gases”, Moscow (1944).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    A.N. Kolmogorov, A.N. Petrovskii and N.S. Piskunov, Bulletin de l’Université d’Etat a Moscou, Sec.A, Vol.1, Math. et Mec., 1 (1937).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    P. Tabeling, J. de Phys. Lettres 44, 665 (1983); P. Hall, Phys.Rev. A29, 2921(1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    I.J. Wygnansky and F.H. Champagne, J.of Fluid Mech. 59, 281 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    H. Chaté and P. Manneville, Phys.Rev. Lett. 58, 112 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y. Pomeau, in “Instabilities and nonequilibrium structures II”, E. Tirapegui and D. Villaroel eds., Kluwer Academic press publishers (Boston, 1989).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. Pumir, P. Manneville and Y. Pomeau, J. of Fluid Mechanics, 135. 27 (1983).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    A.C. Newell, “Solitons in Mathematics and Physics”, SIAM pub. Philadelphia (1985).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    L.N. Bulaevskii and V.L. Ginzburg, Sov. Phys. JETP 18, 530 (1964).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    E. Schlömann and J.D. Milne, IEEE Trans. Magn. Mag-10, 791 (1974); E. Schlömann, IEEE Trans. Mag-11, 1051 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Chapter 10 in “Dissipative Structures and Weak Turbulence” by P. Manneville, Academic press, Boston (1990).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    A. Pocheau, Thèse Université Paris 6, unpublished (1987); A. Pocheau, V. Croquette and P. Le Gal, Physical Review Letters, 55, 10 (1985); A. Pocheau, J. de Phys. 50, 25 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    see for instance D. Schaeffer and M. Golubitsky, Comm. on Math. Phys. 69, 209 (1979), and references therein.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yves Pomeau
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Physique StatistiqueParis Cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations