Advertisement

The Mossoró Sandstone, Canto do Amaro Oil Field, Late Cretaceous of the Potiguar Basin, Brazil: An Example of a Tidal Inlet-Channel Reservoir

  • Eduardo Bagnoli
Part of the Frontiers in Sedimentary Geology book series (SEDIMENTARY)

Abstract

The discovery of the Canto do Amaro oil field in November 1985 is a milestone in the exploratory history of the Potiguar Basin, which has turned out to be the most productive onshore oil field of Brazil and has opened new prospects in an area previously considered to be of minor importance. The Canto do Amaro oil field is located in the onshore part of the Potiguar Basin, Rio Grande do Norte State, in the extreme northeast corner of Brazil (Fig. 9.1). This field has nineteen producing zones, all of them in sandstones of the Upper Cretaceous Açu Fm. The Açu Fm in the Canto do Amaro area is about 650 m thick, and shows, from the base to the top, a transition from coarse sandstones deposited by braided rivers, through medium sandstones deposited by meandering rivers, to fine sandstones deposited in a marginal marine system. The fine sandstones grade upward into an argillaceous zone and then into the shallow-marine limestones of the Jandaira Fm, making up a transgressive megasequence (Fig. 9.2).

Keywords

Inlet Channel Calcite Cement Fine Sandstone Lenticular Bedding Vertical Succession 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barwis, J.H., and Makurath, J.H., 1978, Recognition of ancient tidal inlet sequences: An example from the Upper Silurian Keyser Limestone in Virginia: Sedimentology, v. 25, p. 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Curtis, C.D., 1983, Link between aluminum mobility and destruction of secondary porosity: Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., v. 67, p. 380–393.Google Scholar
  3. Dickinson, W.R., 1970, Interpreting detrital modes of graywacke and arkose: J. Sediment. Petrol., v. 40, p. 695–707.Google Scholar
  4. Donselaar, M.E., and Nio, S.D., 1982, An Eocene tidal inlet/washover type barrier island complex in the South Pyrenean marginal basin, Spain; Geol. Mijnb., v. 61, p. 343–353.Google Scholar
  5. Duc, A.W., and Tye, R.S., 1987, Evolution and stratigraphy of a regressive barrier/backbarrier complex: Kiawah Island, South Carolina: Sedimentology, v. 34, p. 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Galloway, W.E., and Hobday, D.K., 1983, Terrigenous clastic depositional environments: New York, Springer-Verlag, 423 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayes, M.O., and Kana, T.W., 1976, Terrigenous clastic depositional environments—some modern examples: Columbia University of South Carolina, Coastal Research Division, Tech. Rept. II-CRD, p. I-131-II-184.Google Scholar
  8. Hobday, D.K., and Horne, J.C., 1977, Tidally influenced barrier island and estuarine sedimentation in the Upper Carboniferous of southern West Virginia: Sedimentary Geology, v. 18, p. 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Home, J.C., and Ferm, J.C., 1976, Carboniferous depositional environments in the Pochahontas Basin, eastern Kentucky and southern West Virginia: Columbia University of South Carolina, Field Course Guidebook.Google Scholar
  10. Israel, A.M., Ethridge, F.G., and Estes, E.L., 1987, A sedimentologic description of a microtidal, flood-tidal delta, San Luis Pass, Texas: J. Sediment. Petrol., v. 57, p. 288–300.Google Scholar
  11. Ixer, R.A., Turner, P., and Waugh, B., 1979, Authigenic iron and titanium oxides in Triassic red beds: St. Bees Sandstone, Cumbria, Northern England: Geol. J., v. 14, p. 179–192.Google Scholar
  12. Kumar, N., and Sanders, J.E., 1974, Inlet sequence: A vertical succession of sedimentary structures and textures created by the lateral migration of tidal inlets; Sedimentology, v. 21, p. 491–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McBride, E.F., 1963, A classification of common sandstones: J. Sediment. Petrol., v. 33, p. 664–669.Google Scholar
  14. McCubbin, D.G., 1982, Barrier-island and strand-plain facies, in Scholle, P.A., and Spearing, D., eds., Sandstone depositional environments: Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Memoir 31, p. 247–279.Google Scholar
  15. Moslow, T.F., 1984, Depositional models of shelf and shoreline sandstones: Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Cont. Ed. Course Notes, Series 27, 102 p.Google Scholar
  16. Moslow, T.F., and Tye, R.S., 1985, Recognition and characterization of Holocene tidal inlet sequences: Marine Geol., v. 63, p. 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rahmani, R.A., 1988, Estuarine tidal channel and nearshore sedimentation of a Late Cretaceous epicontinental sea, Drumheller, Alberta, Canada, inde Boer, P.L., van Gelder, A., and Nio, S.D., eds., Tide-influenced sedimentary environments and facies: Boston D. Reidel, p. 433–471.Google Scholar
  18. Reineck, H.-E., Sing, L.B., 1980, Depositional sedimentary environments; 2nd ed.: Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 549 p.Google Scholar
  19. Schmidt, V., and McDonald, D.A., 1979, Texture and recognition of secondary porosity in sandstones, in Scholle, P.A., and Schluger, P.R., eds., Aspects of diagenesis: Soc. Econ. Paleont. Mineral. Spec. Publ. 26, p. 209–225.Google Scholar
  20. Turner, P., 1980, Continental red beds: Amsterdam, Elsevier, 562 p.Google Scholar
  21. Visser, M.J., 1980, Neap-spring cycles reflected in Holocene subtidal large-scale bedform deposits A preliminary note: Geology, v. 8, p. 543–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Bagnoli

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations