Advertisement

A Study of the Angular Distribution of Fragments in the Photofission of Uranium Isotope U233

  • N. M. Kulikova
  • N. V. Nikitina
  • N. V. Popov
Conference paper
Part of the The Lebedev Physics Institute Series book series (LPIS, volume 71)

Abstract

The angular anisotropy of the fragments produced in the photofission of nuclei with odd atomic weights was studied in [1, 2], A dipole character was assumed for the absorption of the γ-quanta, and in all cases the yield ratio 1(θ = 90°)/I(θ = 0°) was measured, θ being the angle relative to the direction of the γ-ray beam. In view of the controversial role of the quadrupole absorption of γ-quanta in the photofission process, it was considered desirable to check the isotropy of the distribution for such nuclei over a wide angular range.

Keywords

Angular Distribution Yield Ratio Fission Fragment Sodium Sulfite Angular Anisotropy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    E. I. Winhold and I. Halpern, Phys. Rev., 103:990 (1956).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Katz, A. P. Baerg, and F. Brown, in the book: Second U. N. Internat. Conf. on the Peaceful Use of Atomic Energy. Geneva (1958), p. 200; A. P. Baerg, P. H. Bartholomew, F. Brown, L. Katz, and S. B. Kowalski, Canad. J. Phys., 37:1418 (1959).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. E. Belovitskii and T. A. Romanova, Report of the P. N. Lebedev Physics Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR (1951); T. A. Romanova and L. D. Chikil’dina, Pribory i Tekhn. Eksp., No. 5, p. 88 (1962).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. A. Perfilov and N. S. Ivanova, Zh. Eks. i Teor. Fiz., 29: 551 (1955).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Faissner and F. Gönnenwein, Z. Phys., 153: 257 (1958).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Forkman and S. A. E. Johansson, Nucl. Phys., 20: 136 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. G. de Carvalho, A. G. da Silva, and J. Goldemberg, Nuovo Cim., 19: 1131 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. P. Bannik, N. M. Kulikova, L. E. Lazareva, and V. A. Yakovlev, Zh. Eks. i Teor. Fiz., 33: 53 (1957); A. I. Baz’, N. M. Kulikova, L. E. Lazareva, N. V. Nikitina, and V. A. Semenov, in the book: Transactions of the Second International Conference on the Peaceful Use of Atomic Energy. Geneva, 1958, Vol. 1. Atomizdat (1959), p. 362.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. Bohr, in the book: Transactions of the International Conference on the Peaceful Use of Atomic Energy. Geneva, 1955, Vol. 2. Fizmatgiz (1958), p. 175.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. M. Kulikova
  • N. V. Nikitina
  • N. V. Popov

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations