A Measure of Basicranial Flexion in Pan paniscus, the Pygmy Chimpanzee

  • Jeffrey T. Laitman
  • Raymond C. Heimbuch
Part of the The Pygmy Chimpanzee book series (EBIO)

Abstract

The cranial base is located at one of the most sensitive areas of the body. Developmentally, it can affect or be affected by the brain and its associated vasculature from above; the vertebral column caudally; the dentognathic apparatus anteriorly; and the upper respiratory tract from below. The contributing influences of these differing regions have made the cranial base a prime site of investigation for those examining the evolution or development of cranial morphology. In particular, the various angles of exocranial and endocranial flexion of the base have been used frequently both as a means of monitoring functional development in primates as well as a vehicle for assessing patterns in primate and hominid evolution [see reviews by Schulter (1976) and Sirianni and Swindler (1979)].

Keywords

Migration Covariance Dinates Photography Congo 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cameron, J., 1927, The main angle of cranial flexion (the nasion-pituitary-basion angle), Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 10:275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coolidge, H. J., 1933, Pan paniscus: Pygmy chimpanzee from south of the Congo River, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 18(1):1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cousin, R. P., Fenart, R., and Deblock, R., 1981, Variation ontogeniques des angles basicraniens et faciaux: Etudes comparatives chez Homo et chez Pan, Bull. Mem. Soc. Anthropol. Paris 8(13): 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cramer, D. L., 1974, Cranio-Facial Form in Two African Pongidae, with Special Reference to the Pygmy Chimpanzee, Pan paniscus, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  5. Cramer, D. L., 1977, Craniofacial morphology of Pan paniscus, Contrib. Primatol. 10:1–64.Google Scholar
  6. Deblock, R., and Fenart, R., 1973, Differences sexuelles sur crânes adultes chez Pan paniscus, Bull Assoc. Anat. (Nancy) 57(157):299–306.Google Scholar
  7. Deblock, R., and Fenart, R., 1977, Les angles de la base du crâne chez les chimpanzées, Bull. Assoc. Anat. (Nancy) 61(173): 183–188.Google Scholar
  8. Fenart, R., and Deblock, R., 1973, Pan paniscus et P. troglodytes craniométrie: Étude comparative et ontogenique selon les méthodes classiques et vestibularies, Mus. R. Afr. Cent. Tervuren, Belg. Ann. Ser. Octavo. Sci. Zool. 204:1–473.Google Scholar
  9. Giles, E., 1956, Cranial allometry in the great apes, Hum. Biol. 28:43–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Huxley, T. H., 1867, On two widely contrasted forms of the human cranium, J. Anat. Physiol. 1:60–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Laitman, J. T., 1977, The Ontogenetic and Phylogenetic Development of the Upper Respiratory System and Basicranium in Man, Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
  12. Laitman, J. T., and Crelin, E. S., 1976, Postnatal development of the basicranium and vocal tract region in man, in: Symposium on Development of the Basicranium (J. F. Bosma, ed.), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., pp. 206–219.Google Scholar
  13. Laitman, J. T., and Heimbuch, R. C., 1982, The basicranium of Plio-Pleistocene hominids as an indicator of their upper respiratory systems, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 59(3):323–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laitman, J. T., Heimbuch, R. C., and Crelin, E. S., 1978, Developmental change in a basicranial line and its relationship to the upper respiratory system in living primates, Am. J. Anat. 152:467–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laitman, J. T., Heimbuch, R. C., and Crelin, E. S. 1979, The basicranium of fossil hominids as an indicator of their upper respiratory systems, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 51:15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McHenry, H. M., and Corruccini, R. S., 1981, Pan paniscus and human evolution, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 54:355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mosimann, J. E., 1970, Size allometry: Size and shape variables with characterizations of the lognormal and generalized gamma distributions, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 65:932–945.Google Scholar
  18. Schulter, F. P., 1976, Studies of the basicranial axis: A review, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 44:453–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schultz, A. H., 1969, The skeleton of the chimpanzee, in: The Chimpanzee, Volume I (G. H. Bourne, ed.), S. Karger, Basel, pp. 50–103.Google Scholar
  20. Schwarz, E., 1929, Das Varkomen des Schimpansen auf der linken Kongo-Ufer, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. XVI(4):425–426.Google Scholar
  21. Scott, J. M., 1958, The cranial base, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 16:319–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sirianni, J. E., and Swindler, D. R., 1979, A review of postnatal craniofacial growth in Old World monkeys and apes, Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 22:80–104.Google Scholar
  23. Sneath, P. H. A., 1967, Trend-surface analysis of transformation grids, J. Zool. (London) 151:65–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tatsuoka, M. M., 1971, Multivariate Analysis: Techniques for Education and Physiological Research, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey T. Laitman
    • 1
  • Raymond C. Heimbuch
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyMount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medical BiostatisticsOrtho Pharmaceutical CompanyRaritanUSA

Personalised recommendations