Personality, Team Performance, and Organizational Context

  • Robert Hogan
  • Susan Raza
  • James E. Driskell


Most great human achievements are the products of coordinated group efforts: the moon shot, the exploration of the sunken Titanic, the original Mount Everest expedition, the Allied invasion of Europe in WWII. These undertakings all required the mobilization and orchestration of a group effort. Obviously some group efforts are more successful than others--there are victorious armies and failed Antarctic expeditions. As is the case with every human effort, some groups are more successful than others in achieving their goals.


Team Performance Work Team Organizational Goal Team Effectiveness Team Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blau, P. (1954). Cooperation and competition in a bureaucracy. American Journal of Sociolojy 59, 530–535.Google Scholar
  2. Driskell, J. E. (1987). Effects of group cohesiveness and collective orientation on performance: A review and empirical study. Orlando, FL: Eagle Technology.Google Scholar
  3. Driskell, J. E., Hogan, R., and Salas, E. (1987). Personal and group performance. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Personality and social psychology review (pp. 91–112 ). California: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Gottfredson, G. D., Holland, J. L., and Ogawa, D. K. (1982). Dictionary of Holland occupational codes Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  5. Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., Bond, N.A., and Sutton, M. A. (1954). A factor analysis study of human interests. Psychological Monographs 68 (Whole No. 375).Google Scholar
  6. Hackman, J. R. (1968). Effects of task characteristics on group products. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 4, 162–187.Google Scholar
  7. Herold, D. M. (1978). Improving the performance effectiveness of groups through a task-contingent selection of intervention strategies. The Academy of Management Review 3, 315–325.Google Scholar
  8. Hogan, R. (1976). Egoism, altruism, and culture. American Psychologist 31, 363–366.Google Scholar
  9. Holland, J. L. (1966). A psychological classification scheme for vocations and major fields. Journal of Counseling Psychology 13, 278–288.Google Scholar
  10. Latham, G. P., and Balders, J. J. (1975). The “practical significance” of Locke’s theory of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology 60, 122–124.Google Scholar
  11. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Morris, C. G. (1967). Task effects on group interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5, 545–554.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Hogan
    • 1
  • Susan Raza
    • 1
  • James E. Driskell
    • 2
  1. 1.The University of TulsaTulsaUSA
  2. 2.Eagle TechnologyUSA

Personalised recommendations