Aging and Performance: A Mental Workload Analysis

  • George Kellas
  • Greg Simpson
  • F. Richard Ferraro


It is estimated that by the year 2000, 31 million Americans will be 65 years of age or older (Ward, 1979). It is not surprising, therefore, that psychology has seen an increased interest in aging, in terms of basic psychological processes as well as the practical problems of dealing with an aging population. Of particular importance are the presumed effects of aging, both physical and cognitive, that may affect the elderly’s role in society in general, and in the work force in particular. For example, questions of job advancement for older workers, and even mandatory retirement, are based on (possibly erroneous) assumptions about age-related declines in performance capacity.


Word Recognition Lexical Decision Stimulus Type Lexical Decision Task Letter String 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Becker, C. A. (1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 556–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cerella, J. (1985). Information processing rates in the elderly. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Craik, F. I. M., & Simon, E. (1980). Age differences in memory: The role of attention and depth of processing. In L. W. Poon, J. L. Fozard, L. S. Cermak, D. Arensberg, & L. W. Thompson (Eds.), New directions in memory & aging: Proceedings of the George Talland Memorial Conference. NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Forster, K. I., & Bednall, E. S. (1976). Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access. Memory and Cognition, 4, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256–281.Google Scholar
  6. Horner, K. L., Rushston, J. P., & Vernon, P. A. (1986). Relation between aging and research productivity of academic psychologists. Psychology & Aging, 1, 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Humphreys, G. W. (1985). Attention, automaticity, and autonomy in visual word processing. In D. Besner, T. Waller, & G. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5 ). NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Jastrzembski, J. E. (1981). Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 278–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kausler, D. H. (1982). Experimental psychology & human aging. NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Kellas, G., Ferraro, F. R., & Simpson, G. B. (under review). Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.Google Scholar
  11. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kynette, D., & Kemper, S. (1987). Aging and loss of grammatical forms: A cross-sectional study of language performance. Language & Communication, 6, 43–59.Google Scholar
  13. Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the mental lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rybash, J. M., Hoyer, W. J., & Roodin, P. A. (1986). Adult cognition and aging. NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  15. Salthouse, T. A. human aging (1982). Adult cognition: An experimental psychology of human aging NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Salthouse, T. A. Holland. (1985). A theory of cognitive aging. Amsterdam: NorthGoogle Scholar
  17. Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. L., & Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic access of the meaning of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology 14, 489–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Simpson, G. B. (1984). Lexical ambiguity and its role on models of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 316–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Simpson, G. B., & Burgess, C. (in press). Implications of lexical ambiguity resolution for word recognition and comprehension. In S. L. Small, G. W. Cottrell, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution in the comprehension of human language. Palo Alto, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Somberg, B. L., & Salthouse, T. A. (1982). Divided attention in young and old adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 651–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re) consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1, 645–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ward, R. A. (1979). The aging experience. NY: Lippincott.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Kellas
    • 1
  • Greg Simpson
    • 2
  • F. Richard Ferraro
    • 1
  1. 1.University of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.University of Nebraska-OmahaOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations