Skip to main content
  • 415 Accesses

Abstract

There seem to be a host of malevolent factors that work in concert to inhibit the collection of accurate RCS information. They range from random internal thermal noise generated in the instrumentation system to residual external echoes from optically invisible obstacles on the test range. The cumulative result of this multiplicity of internal and external errors is an absolute limit on data accuracy that is seldom better than 0.5 dB (about 12 percent).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. B. Dybdal and R. H. Ott, “Coherent RF Error Statistics,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-34, December 1986, pp. 1413–1420.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. B. Dybdal, “Radar Cross Section Measurements,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 75, April 1987, pp. 498–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun (editors), “Error Function and Fresnel Integrals,” Handbook of Mathematical Functions, U.S. National Bureau of Standards, November 1970, Chapter 7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Boersma, “Computation of Fresnel Integrals,” Mathematics of Computation, vol. 14, National Acacemy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1960, p. 380.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. F. Knott, “Far Field RCS Test Ranges,” Radar Reflectivity Measurement, edited by N. C. Currie, Artech House, Norwood, Mass., 1989, Chapter 9, pp. 307–367.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. G. Kouyoumjian and L. Peters, Jr., “Range Requirements in Radar Cross Section Measurements,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 53, August 1965, pp. 920–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. D. Kraus, Antennas ( first edition ), McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1950, p. 350.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. F. Knott and T. B. A Senior, “Studies of Scattering by Cellular Plastic Materials,” Report No. 5849–1-F, University of Michigan, Radiation Laboratory, April 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Radar Cross-Section Measurements with the HP 8510 Network Analyzer,“ Hewlett-Packard Product Note No. 8510–2 (no date cited).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. F. Knott, J. F. Shaeffer, and M. T. Tuley, Radar Cross Section, Artech House, Norwood, Mass., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Van Nostrand Reinhold

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knott, E.F. (1993). Measurement Errors. In: Radar Cross Section Measurements. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9904-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9904-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9906-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9904-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics