Advertisement

Dynamic Test Ranges

  • Eugene F. Knott

Abstract

While test targets may be installed on support pylons or foam columns and rotated in the beam of an instrumentation radar for static measurements, the data collected do not necessarily indicate the signals that would be sensed by an operational radar tracking a tactical target. This is because engine turbines rotate, the stresses of flight vibrate an airframe, and the motion of the wheels and tracks of ground vehicles constantly changes the target configuration from one instant to the next. Moreover, the target support structures used on static test ranges are capable of supporting a few thousand pounds at best, while some tactical targets weigh dozens of tons or, in the case of the B-1 and B-2 bombers, hundreds of tons. Further, some tactical ground targets, like trucks and tanks, should probably be measured on the ground, rather than being awkwardly isolated from the ground environment on a support tower, even if one were to be built. Thus, measurements performed on a static range often must be validated or checked on dynamic test ranges, for which the measurement problem is much more challenging.

Keywords

Elevation Angle Target Motion Radar Cross Section Test Target Instrumentation System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. V. Blake, “Prediction of Radar Range,” in Radar Handbook, edited by M. E. Skolnik, McGraw-Hill, New York and London, 1990, Chapter 2, Fig. 2.11, p. 2. 34.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eli Brookner, Aspects of Modern Radar, Artech House, Norwood, Mass., 1988, Table 2A, pp. 161–203.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. C. Farnett and G. H. Stevens, “Pulse Compression Radar,” in Radar Handbook, edited by M. E. Skolnik, McGraw-Hill, New York and London, 1990, Chapter 10, p. 10. 1.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C.-C. Chen and H. C. Andrews, “Target-Motion-Induced Radar Imagery,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. AES-16, Jan. 1980, pp. 2–14.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. D. Howard, “Tracking Radar,” in Radar Handbook, 2d edition, edited by Merrill Skolnik, McGraw-Hill, New York and London, 1990, Chapter 18, Fig. 18.9, p. 18. 10.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. F. Knott, J. F. Shaeffer, and M. T. Tuley, Radar Cross Section, Artech House, Norwood, Mass., 1985, pp. 322–323.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. J. Cantafio, “Range Instrumentation Ships,” in Range Instrumentation, edited by E. H. Ehling, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Chapter 7, 1967, pp. 479–492.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. J. Stein, “Cobra Judy Phased Array Radar Tested,” Aviation Week and Space Technology,August 10, 1981, pp. 70–73. [Some photographs of the radar were published on p. 105 of the August 17, 1981 issue of AWST.] Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eli Brookner, Aspects of Modern Radar, Artech House, Norwood, Mass., 1988, p. 25.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. Sweetman and J. C. Goodall, Lockheed F-117A, Motorbooks International Publishers, Osceola, Wis., 1990.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kwajalein Missile Range Instrumentation and Support Facilities Manual,“ U.S. Army Ballistic Missile Defense System Command, Huntsville, Alabama, 15 June 1978. (The manual has been updated several times since the original issue of 1967.)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Zorpette, “Kwajalein’s New Role: Radars for SDI,” IEEE Spectrum, vol. 26, no. 3, March 1989, pp. 64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    I. D. Olin and F. D. Queen, “Dynamic Measurement of Radar Cross Sections,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 53, August 1965, pp. 954–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. I. Skolnik, Introduction to Radar Systems, McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York and London, 1980, p. 45.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Saget, D. Billot, and J. Legendre, “MAESTRO: A Mobile In-flight Dynamic RCS System,” Proceedings of the Antenna Measurements Techniques Association, held in Boulder, Colorado, October 7 through 11, 1991, pp. 14–3 through 14–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Van Nostrand Reinhold 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene F. Knott

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations