Abstract
In 1977 a questionnaire was sent to all mathematics graduates of the BRD asking what their current professional activity was. This very fact demonstrates that while the existence of a specialized training program forms the basis for recognizing the professional status of the mathematician in current society, the manner and extent of the ever-changing and expanding possibilities for utilizing the special skills of this professional group must be constantly reexamined. These shifts are even recognizable in the instructional program itself, for the course offerings in the various institutions of learning are closely correlated with current research, which influences not only the composition and selection of materials for required courses of study but also the introduction of new disciplines. That even areas considered as the core of the educational curriculum are subject to gradual change is indicated by the progressively diminishing course offerings in number theory and geometry, which were once considered classical areas of study, but are scarcely even regarded in current research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Nathan Reingold in “Definitions and Speculations: The Professionalization of Science in America in the Nineteenth Century”, The Pursuit of Knowledge in the Early American Republic (eds. A. Oleson and S.C. Brown), Baltimore-London 1976,pp. 33–69, holds that this process started in the U.S. in the 1860’s. This would have occured several decades earlier in Europe.
See Ivo Schneider, “Die mathematischen Praktiker im See-, Vermessungs- und Wehrwesen vom 15. bis zum 19. Jahrhundert”, Technikgeschichte,37 (1970), pp. 210–242.
See Kepler’s letter to an unknown lady written in 1612, where he discusses the prestige connected with the title “mathematicus” or “Sternseher”, in: Johannes Kepler, Gesammelte Werke, vol. 17, München 1955, pp. 39–44, esp. 40f.
See F. Viète, Opera mathematica, Leiden 1647, p. 305.
See F. Viète, Opera mathematica, Leiden 1647, p. 305.
Compare Ivo Schneider, “Descartes’ Diskussion der Fermatschen Extremwertmethode — ein Stück Ideengeschichte der Mathematik”, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 7 (1971), pp. 354–374.
See E.G.R. Taylor, The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor and Stuart England, Cambridge 1954, pp. 81f.
See Taylor ibid. p. 216.
See Correspondence of Scientific Men (ed. S.J. Rigaud) in two vols., Oxford 1841, esp. the letter from Collins to Baker on August 19, 1676 or Cotes to Jones on February 15, 1711.
See especially Collins’s letters to various persons in Rigaud ibid.
This becomes especially clear in the correspondence between Lagrange and d’Alembert. See Oeuvres de Lagrange, vol. 13, Paris 1882.
See Ivo Schneider, “Der Mathematiker Abraham de Moivre (1667–1754)”, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 5 (1968), pp. 177–317.
This is beautifully illustrated by the letter from Johann Bernoulli to Euler on April 23, 1743, in which he contends that he would leave his country for the sake of better conditions for mathematical research. See Correspondence Mathématique et Physique de quelques célèbres géomètres du XVIIIème siècle (ed. P.-H. Fuss), in two vols., Petersburg 1843, esp. vol. II, p. 524.
See letter from Lagrange to d’Alembert on September 21, 1781; Oeuvres de Lagrange, vol. 13, p. 368.
See e.g. letter from d’Alembert to Lagrange on April 10, 1769, where d’Alembert reports that Condorcet’s family has given up their resistance to his membership in the Academy even though many aristocrats believe “que le titre et le métier de savant dérogent à la noblesse”. Oeuvres de Lagrange, vol. 13, p. 130.
See Die Berliner und die Petersburger Akademie der Wissenschaften im Briefwechsel Leonhard Eulers (ed. A.P. Youschkevitch and E. Winter) in three parts, Berlin 1959, 1961, 1976.
See Gert Schubring’s article in this volume.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schneider, I. (1981). Forms of Professional Activity in Mathematics before the Nineteenth Century. In: Mehrtens, H., Bos, H., Schneider, I. (eds) Social History of Nineteenth Century Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9491-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9491-4_6
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-8176-3033-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9491-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive