The Sensory Functions of the Cerebellum of the Thornback Ray, Platyrhinoidis triseriata

  • Shang-liang Tong
  • Theodore Holmes Bullock


Single unit spikes and evoked field potentials were recorded in different parts and depths of the corpus cerebelli and auricle of immobilized rays before and after stimulating with light, electric fields, touch, tail bending and direct shock to mechanoreceptive nerves of the lateral line.

Discrete areas of the cerebellum are responsive to these modalities and the areas show limited overlap; they are all distinct from the area reported by Plassmann to be responsive to angular acceleration. The visual and tactile-proprioceptive areas are large; the electric area is small. Most units are excited only by one modality.

The tail is represented only in the posterior lobe; trigeminal innervation extends from the posterior onto the anterior lobe, suggesting some topographic projection.

The dynamic characteristics of the responses were examined particulary in the visual units. To a flash, units discharge up to six bursts of spikes in 500 ms. This pattern is reduced at repetition rates >1/s; above ca. 4/s units tend to fire irregularly. Various kinds of units are found in respect to the succession of responses to short trains of flashes. Some units fire much better to objects moving in a limited visual field with a certain direction and rate.


Lateral Line Anterior Lobe Posterior Lobe Optic Tectum Spike Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aronson LR (1963) The central nervous system of sharks and bony fishes with special reference to sensory and integrative mechanisms. In: Gilbert P (ed) Sharks and survival. Heath. Boston, pp 165 – 241Google Scholar
  2. Bodznick DA, Northcutt RG (1980) Segregation of electroand mechanoreceptive inputs to the elasmobranch medulla. Brain Res 195: 313 – 322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boord RL, Campbell CBG (1977) Structural and functional organization of the lateral line system of sharks. Am Zool 17: 431 – 441Google Scholar
  4. Boord RL, Northcutt RG (1982) Ascending lateral line pathways to the midbrain of the clearnose skate Raja eglanteria. J Comp Neurol (in press)Google Scholar
  5. Bullock TH, Corwin JT (1979) Acoustic evoked activity in the brain of sharks. J Comp Physiol 1229: 223 – 234Google Scholar
  6. Corwin JT (1978) The relation of inner ear structure to feeding behavior in sharks and rays. In: Johari O (ed) Scanning electron microscopy’ 1978. vol ll. SEM. AMF O’Hare, IL. pp 1105 – 1112Google Scholar
  7. Corwin JT (1981) Audition in elasmobranchs. In: Tat olga W N. Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Hearing and sound communication in fishes. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp SI-105Google Scholar
  8. Ebbesson SOE, Campbell CBG (1973) On t’ne organization of cerebellar efferent pathwasy in the nurse shark ( Ging(rmo.v-tontn cirratum). J Comp Neurol 152: 233–254Google Scholar
  9. McCormick CA (1981) Comparative neuroanatom of the octavolateralis area of fishes. In: Tasolga WN. Popper AN. Fay RR (eds) Hearing and sound communication in fishes. Springer. Berlin Heidelberg New York. pp 375 – 382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Montgomery JC (1980) Dogfish horizontal canal system: responses of primary afferent, vestibular. and cerebellar neurons to rotational stimulation. Neuroscience 5: 1761 – 1769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Northcutt RG (1978) Brain organization in the cartilaginous fishes. In: Hodgson ES. Mathewson RF (eds) Sensory biology of sharks, skates, and rays. Office of Nasal Research. Arlington. VA. pp 117 – 193Google Scholar
  12. Paul DH. Roberts BL (1974) Responses of neurones in the cerebellar corpus of the dogfish (S.rlior/tìuto caniculal. 1 Phsiol 244:47–49 (Abstr)Google Scholar
  13. Paul DH. Roberts BL (1976) Responses of cerebellar nuclear neurones in the elasmobranch fish Seyliorhinus eanieuIu. J Physiol 257: 43–14 (Abstr)Google Scholar
  14. Platt CJ. Bullock TH, Czéh G, Kovacevic N. Konjevié Gojkovic M (1974) Comparison of electroreceptor. mechanoreceptor and optic evoked potentials in the brain of some rays and sharks. J Comp Physiol 95: 323 – 355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rizzolo A (1929) A study of equilibrium in the smooth dogfish (Galeux cants. Mitchill) after removal of different parts of the brain. Biol Bull 57: 245 – 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roberts BL (1981) Central processing of acousticolateralis signals in elasmobranchs. In: Tavolga WN, Popper AN,Google Scholar
  17. Fay RR (eds) Hearing and sound communication in fishes. Springer. Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 357–373Google Scholar
  18. Ten Cate J (1935) Physiologie des Zentralnervensystems der Fische. Erg Biol 11: 335 – 409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tong SL, Bullock TH (1982) Electroreceptive representation and its dynamics in the cerebellum of the catfish, lentlurus nebulosus ( Ictaluridae, Siluriformes). J Comp Physiol 145: 289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tong SL, Lee L, Bullock TH (1982) Distribution of responses to visual, mechanical and electrical stimulation in the cerebellum of catfish and ray. Neuroscience 7 (Suppl). s212 (Abstr)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shang-liang Tong
    • 1
  • Theodore Holmes Bullock
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurobiology Unit.Scripps Institution of Oceanography and Department of Neurosciences,School of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego,La JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations