Circuitry and Beyond: How Far Does Connectivity Get Us?

  • Theodore Holmes Bullock


The prevailing view of organized neural masses is in the terms and imagery of circuits and networks, including “local circuits.” Reasons are given for doubting the adequacy of thinking in terms of circuitry. Using the analogy of a crowd at a sports stadium, I underline those features of neural function that involve several kinds of signals, for example communication by other than conventional synapses, including electrical field effects and transmitter and modulator action over distances of more than a cleft width. Nonsynaptic variables that contribute to integration and do not fit in the usual view of circuitry include the roles of geometry of axonal terminal ramifications and dendritic arbors and the three-dimensional distribution of anatomical synapses to form functional synapses. It is a major challenge today to avoid confining our mental image and dialogue to the schematics and the seriously simplified list of parameters in circuit and network diagrams, though they are essential first steps in understanding any given neural system.


Central Pattern Generator Coupling Function Dendritic Arbor Local Circuit Electrical Field Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aladzhalova NA (1958): Electrographic study of pharmacologically induced changes in the ultra-slow waves of the cortical potentials. Sechenov Physiol J USSR 44: 757 - 764Google Scholar
  2. Barker JL, Smith TG Jr (1980): Intercellular communication in the nervous system and the action of clinically important drugs. In: Information Processing in the Nervous System, Pinsker HM, Willis WD Jr, eds. New York: Raven Press, pp 59 - 75Google Scholar
  3. Carew Ti, Kelley DB (1989): Perspectives in Neural Systems and Behavior. New York: Alan R Liss IncGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen MJ (1970): A comparison of invertebrate and vertebrate central neurons. In: The Neurosciences: A Second Study Program, Schmitt FO, ed. New York: Rockefeller University Press, pp 798 - 812Google Scholar
  5. Fentress IC (1976): Simpler Networks and Behavior. Sunderland MA: SinauerGoogle Scholar
  6. Getting PA (1989): Emerging principles governing the operation of neural networks. Annu Rev Neurosci 12: 185 - 204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hartline DK, Russell DF, Raper JA, Graubard K (1988): Special cellular and synaptic mechanisms in motor pattern generation. Comp Biochem Physiol 91C: 115 - 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirata Y (1964): Some observations on the fine structure of the synapses in the olfactory bulb of the mouse, with particular reference to the atypical synaptic configurations. Arch Histol Jpn 24: 293 - 302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoyle G (1957): Comparative Physiology of the Nervous Control of Muscular Contraction. Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoyle G (1983): On the way to neuroethology: the identified neuron approach. In: Neuroethologyand Behavioral Physiology. Huber F, Markl H, eds. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp 9 - 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacklet JW (1989): Neuronal and cellular oscillators. New York, Basel: DekkerGoogle Scholar
  12. King DG (1976): Organization of crustacean neuropil. I. Patterns of synaptic connections in lobster stomatogastric ganglion. J Neurocytol 5: 207 - 237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kristan WB (1992): Neuronal basis of behavior. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2: 781 - 787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Llinas RR (1988): The intrinsic electrophysiological properties of mammalian neurons: insights into central nervous system function. Science 242: 1654 - 1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943): A logical calculus for ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115133Google Scholar
  16. Rakic P(1975): Local circuit neurons. Neurosci Res Program Bull 13: 290 - 446Google Scholar
  17. Rand RH, Cohen AH, Holmes PJ (1988): Systems of coupled oscillators as models of central pattern generators. In: Neural Control of Rhythmic Movements in Vertebrates, Cohen AH, Rossignol S, Grillner S, eds. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp 333 - 367Google Scholar
  18. Schmitt FO (1984): Molecular regulators of brain function: a new view. Neuroscience 13: 991 - 1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmitt FO, Worden FG (1979): The Neurosciences: Fourth Study Program. Cambridge MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmitt FO, Dev P, Smith BH (1976): Electrotonic process- ing of information by brain cells. Science 193: 114 - 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Selverston AI (1980): Are central pattern generators understandable? Behav Brain Sci 3: 535 - 571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Selverston AI (1985): Model Neural Networks and Behavior. New York: Plenum PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Selverston AI (1993): Modeling of neural circuits: what have we learned? Annu Rev Neurosci 16: 531 - 546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Selverston AI, Moulins M (1987): The Crustacean Stomatogastric System. Berlin: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Selverston AI, Russell DF, Miller JP, King DG (1976): The stomatogastric nervous system. Structure and function of a small neural network. Prog Neurobiol 7: 215 - 290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Usherwood PNR, Newth DR (1975): "Simple" Nervous Systems. London: Edward ArnoldGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodore Holmes Bullock
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neurosciences 0201University of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations