Advertisement

Permeability Characteristics of Continental Slope and Deep-Water Carbonates from a Microfabric Perspective

  • Dawn L. Lavoie
  • William R. Bryant
Part of the Frontiers in Sedimentary Geology book series (SEDIMENTARY)

Summary

Permeability, the rate at which fluids move through a porous medium, affects the consolidation and reduction in porosity of a sediment with time and overburden pressure. Most marine clays consist of smectites and illites that are fine-grained and platey. In contrast, carbonate sediments are composed of multishaped, multisized components. In general, clay-rich sediments consolidate to lower porosities and are less permeable than carbonates at given overburden pressures. This difference is related to microfabric.

Numerous samples recovered from the continental slope to midocean depths were consolidated in the laboratory, and permeabilities were determined directly by using falling head permeameters and indirectly by consolidation theory. In the marine clays, porosity values ranged between 75 and 40%, and permeability values ranged between 1 × 10−6 cm/s and 1 × 10−10 cm/s. In contrast, carbonate sediments with porosities between 60 and 40% had permeabilities that ranged between 1 × 10−4 and 1 × 10−7 cm/s. Sediments with varying percentages of carbonate content, but with a matrix of clay particles, fall within the same range as the clays. At given porosities, permeabilities within the carbonate sediments are determined by microfabric. For example, grain-supported samples have a higher permeability (1 × 10−4 cm/s) than matrix-supported samples (1 × 10−5 and 1 × 10−6 cm/s). In general, matrix-supported carbonate sediments composed of aragonite needles have higher permeabilities (1 ×10−5 cm/s) than matrix-supported sediments of low-magnesian calcite composed predominantly of coccoliths (1 × 10−6 cm/s). Analysis of scanning and transmission electron micrographs of carbonate and clayey sediments confirm the more open microstructure of carbonate sediments as opposed to the more evenly distributed but smaller sized clay micropores.

Keywords

Continental Slope Carbonate Sediment Pore Throat Initial Permeability Ocean Drill Program Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennett, R.H., K.M. Fischer, D.L. Lavoie, W.R. Bryant, and R. Rezak, 1989. Porometry and fabric of marine clay and carbonate sediments: determinants of permeability. Marine Geology, v. 89, p. 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bryant, W.R. and R.H. Bennett, 1988. Origin, physical, and mineralogical nature of red clays: The Pacific Ocean Basin as a model. Geo-Marine Letters, v. 8, p. 189–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryant, W.R., W. Hottman, and P. Trabant, 1975. Permeability of unconsolidated and consolidated marine sediments, Gulf of Mexico. Marine Geotechnology, v. 1, p. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Droxler, A.W., W. Schlager, and C.C. Whallon, 1983. Quaternary aragonite cycles and oxygen-isotope record in Bahamian carbonate ooze. Geology, v. 11, p. 235–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eberli, G.P., 1988. Physical properties of carbonate turbidite sequences surrounding the Bahamas—implications for slope stability and fluid movements. In: Austin, J.A., W. Schlager and others (eds.), Proceedings, Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, 101, College Station, TX, p. 305–314.Google Scholar
  6. Enos, P. and L.H. Sawatsky, 1980. Pore networks in Holocene carbonate sediments. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 51, p. 961–981.Google Scholar
  7. Etris, E.L., D.S. Brumfield, R. !Ehrlich, and S.J. Crabtree, 1988. Relations between pores, throats and permeability: a petrographic/physical analysis of some carbonate grainstones and packstones. Carbonates and Evaporites, v. 3 (1), p. 17–32.Google Scholar
  8. Fischer, K.M., H. Li, R.H. Bennett, and W.A. Dunlap, 1990. Calculation of permeability coefficients of soils and marine sediments. Environmental Software, v. 5, p. 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fruth, L.S., Jr., G.R. Omre, and F.A. Donath, 1966. Experimental compaction effects in carbonate sediments. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 36 (3), p. 747–754.Google Scholar
  10. Hamilton, E.L., 1976. Variations of density and porosity with depth in deep-sea sediments. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 46 (2), p. 280–300.Google Scholar
  11. Hathaway, J.C. and E.C. Robertson, 1961. Microtexture of artificially consolidated aragonitic mud. USGS Prof. Paper, 424C, p. 301–304.Google Scholar
  12. Lambe, T.W., 1951. Soil Testing for Engineers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 165 p.Google Scholar
  13. Lambe, T.W. and R.V. Whitman, 1969. Soil Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 553 p.Google Scholar
  14. Lavoie, D.L., 1988. Geotechnical properties of sediments in a carbonate-slope environment: Ocean Drilling Program Site 630, Northern Little Bahama Bank. In: Austin, J.A., W. Schlager and others (eds.), Proceedings, Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, 101, College Station, TX, p. 315–326.Google Scholar
  15. Mitchell, J.K., 1976. Fundamentals of Soil Behavior. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 422 p.Google Scholar
  16. Mullins, H.T., L.S. Land, W.W. Wise, Jr., D.I. Seigel, P.M. Masters, E.J. Hinchey, and K.R. Price, 1985. Shallow subsurface diagenesis of Pleistocene periplatform ooze: Northern Bahamas. Sedimentology, v. 32, p. 480–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rezak, R. and D.L. Lavoie, 1990. Consolidated related fabric changes in periplatform sediments. Geo-Marine Letters, v. 10, p. 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Richards, A.F. and E.L. Hamilton, 1967. Investigation of deep-sea cores, III. Consolidation. In: Richards, A.F. (ed.), Marine Geotechnique, University of Illinois Press, p. 93–117.Google Scholar
  19. Schlager, W. and R.N. Ginsburg, 1981. Bahama carbonate platforms-the deep and the past. Marine Geology, v. 44, p. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schlager, W. and N.P. James, 1978. Low-magnesian calcite limestones forming at the deep-sea floor, Tongue of the Ocean, Bahamas. Sedimentology, v. 25, p. 675–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shinn, E.A., R.B. Halley, J.H. Hudson, and B.H. Lidz, 1977. Limestone compaction: an enigma. Geology, v. 5, p. 21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shinn, E.A. and D.M. Robbin, 1983. Mechanical and chemical compaction of fine-grained shallow-water limestones. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 53, p. 595–618.Google Scholar
  23. Terzaghi, R.D., 1940. Compaction of lime mud as a cause of secondary structure. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 10 (2), p. 78–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dawn L. Lavoie
  • William R. Bryant

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations