Trends of Sedimentary Microfabrics of Ooid Tidal Channels and Deltas

  • Cindy Carney
  • Mark R. Boardman
Part of the Frontiers in Sedimentary Geology book series (SEDIMENTARY)


Tidal channels within ooid sand shoals are involved in the longshore transport of ooids, the offbank and onbank transport of ooids and perhaps the generation of ooids. Channels are oriented perpendicular to the axis of highest ooid concentration and are linked to the transport system by their ebb-tidal deltas.

On Joulters Cays, Bahamas, surface samples and cores from four channels provide information on trends of microfabrics that should be useful for interpretation of ancient oolites. The percent ooids is maximum at the ebb-tidal delta and decreases both seaward and bankward where peloids and skeletal grains increase in abundance. Bioerosion of ooids is minimal at the ebb-tidal delta and increases into more stabilized areas both bankward (up channel) and seaward (offshore). Ooids are well sorted, unimodal and have fewer laminae (are smaller) on the ebb-tidal delta; whereas within the channel, ooids are bimodal in size (large ooids have numerous laminae and small ooids have fewer laminae) and therefore less well sorted. Nuclei of ooids are dominated by peloids in all environments. A trend of increasing size of ooids on ebb-tidal deltas and along intervening beaches in the direction of longshore transport has been noted. Size variation of ooids is not dependent on the size of the nucleus. Bimodality of ooids may result from in-place ooid generation and/or transport under variable energy conditions.

Tidal channels can migrate, be blocked for variable time periods, and can rapidly fill with sediment. Lime mud forms or accumulates as layers (several centimeters thick) within high-energy tidal channels. These layers may result from storm transport of lime mud from interior lagoons or from in situ accumulation during a period of blockage.


Tidal Channel Offshore Area Sedimentary Petrology Sand Shoal North Channel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ball, M.M., 1967. Carbonate sand bodies of Florida and the Bahamas. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 37, p. 556–591.Google Scholar
  2. Bathurst, R.G.C., 1966. Boring algae, micrite envelopes and lithification of molluscan biosparites. Journal of Geology, v. 5, p. 15–32.Google Scholar
  3. Bathurst, R.G.C., 1975. Carbonate sediments and their diagenesis. Developments in Sedimentology 12, Elsevier, New York. 658 p.Google Scholar
  4. Bebout, D.G., R.P. Major, P.M. Harris, N. Tyler, and C. Kerans, 1990. Internal, textural and diagenetic variations within a modern ooid grain barJoulters Cays, Bahamas. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, v. 22, p. 132.Google Scholar
  5. Boardman, M.R. and C. Carney, 1991. Lime mud accumulation in ooid tidal channels, Bahamas. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 61, p. 661–680.Google Scholar
  6. Carney, C. and M.R. Boardman, 1992. Petrologic comparison of oolitic sediment from Joulters Cays and Andros Island, Bahamas. In: Bain, R.J. (ed.), 5th Symposium of the Geology of the Bahamas. Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador, Bahamas, p. 37–55.Google Scholar
  7. Dill, R.F. and R.P. Steinen, 1988. Deposition of carbonate mud beds within high-energy, subtidal sand dunes, Bahamas. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Abstracts, v. 72, p. 178–179.Google Scholar
  8. Dill, R.F., C.G.S. Kendall, and E.A. Shinn, 1989. Giant subtidal stromatolites and related sedimentary features: Field Trip Guidebook, v. T373. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., 33 p.Google Scholar
  9. Dravis, J.J., 1977. Holocene sedimentary depositional environments on Eleuthera Bank, Bahamas. Unpubl. M.S. Thesis, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 386 p.Google Scholar
  10. Flügel, E., 1982. Microfacies Analysis of Limestones. Springer-Verlag, New York, 633 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman, G.M., 1958. Determination of sieve-size distribution from thin-section data in sedimentary petrological studies. Journal of Geology, v. 66, p. 394–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Golubic, S., 1969. Distribution, taxonomy, and boring patterns of marine endolithic algae. American Zoologist, v. 9, p. 747–751.Google Scholar
  13. Halley, R.B. and P.M. Harris, 1979. Fresh-water cementation of a 1,000year-old oolite. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 49, p. 969–988.Google Scholar
  14. Halley, R.B., P.M. Harris, and A.C. Hine, 1983. Bank margin environment. In: Scholle, P.A., D.G. Bebout, and C.H. Moore (eds.), Carbonate Depositional Environments. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, v. 33, p. 463–506.Google Scholar
  15. Harris, P.M., 1977. Sedimentology of the Joulters Cay ooid sand shoal, Great Bahama Bank. Unpubl. Ph.D. Dissert., University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 452 p.Google Scholar
  16. Harris, P.M., 1979. Facies anatomy and diagenesis of a Bahamian ooid shoal: Sedimenta VII. The Comparative Sedimentology Laboratory, University of Miami, Miami, FL, 163 p.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, P.M., R.B. Halley, and K.J. Lukas, 1979. Endolith microborings and their preservation in Holocene-Pleistocene (Bahama-Florida) ooids. Geology, v. 7, p. 216–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Illing, L.V., 1954. Bahamian calcareous sands. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 38, p. 1–95.Google Scholar
  19. Imbrie, J. and H. Buchanan, 1965. Sedimentary structures in modern carbonate sands of the Bahamas. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publication, v. 12, p. 149–172.Google Scholar
  20. Imbrie, J. and E.G. Purdy, 1962. Classification of modern Bahamian carbonate sediments. In: Ham, W.E. (ed.), Classification of Carbonate Rocks. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, v. 1, p. 253–272.Google Scholar
  21. Margolis, S. and R.W. Rex, 1971. Endolithic algae and micrite envelope formation in Bahamian oolites as revealed by scanning electron microscopy. Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 82, p. 843–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Newell, N.D., E.G. Purdy, and J. Imbrie, 1960. Bahamian oolitic sand. Journal of Geology, v. 68, p. 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Newell, N.D. and K. Rigby, 1957. Geological studies of the Great Bahama Bank. In: LeBlanc, R.J. and J.G. Breeding (eds.), Regional Aspects of Carbonate Deposition. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication, v. 5, p. 15–22.Google Scholar
  24. Purdy, E.G., 1961. Bahamian oolite shoals. In: Peterson, J.A. and J.C. Osmond (eds.), Geometry of Sandstone Bodies. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Symposium, p. 53–62.Google Scholar
  25. Purdy, E.G., 1963. Recent calcium carbonate facies of the Great Bahama Bank. Sedimentary Facies. Journal of Geology, v. 72, p. 472–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shinn, E.A., R.P. Steinen, B.H. Lidz, and P.K. Swart, 1989. Whitings, a sedimentologic dilemma. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 59, p. 147–161.Google Scholar
  27. Smosna, R. and B. Koehler (in press). Tidal origin of a Mississippian oolite on the West Virginia Dome, In: Zuppann, C. and B. Keith (eds.), Mississippian Oolites of the United States. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Studies in Geology.Google Scholar
  28. Strasser, A. and E. Davaud, 1986. Formation of Holocene limestone sequences by progradation, cementation, and erosion: two examples from the Bahamas. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 56, p. 422–428.Google Scholar
  29. Thompson, T.A., M.A. Brown, and E.P. Kvale, 1989. Architectural elements of an ancient carbonate sand wave: an example from the Salem Limestone (Mississippian) in southern Indiana. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Program, v. 21, p. 292.Google Scholar
  30. Tucker, M.E. and V.P. Wright, 1990. Carbonate Sedimentology. Blackwell, Oxford, England, 482 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cindy Carney
  • Mark R. Boardman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations