Preferred Orientation and Velocity Anisotropy in Marine Clay-Bearing Calcareous Sediments
In order to better understand the role of preferred orientation of calcite in the compressional velocity (V p ) anisotropy of calcareous marine sediments, ultrasonic V p and x-ray pole figure goniometry measurements were made on selected laminated calcareous claystones, laminated clay-bearing limestones, and nonlaminated limestones from various DSDP sites. Although all samples exhibit V p anisotropy (up to 20%), none exhibit calcite-preferred orientation. Thus, V p anisotropy in these calcareous sediments is not caused by calcite-preferred orientation, in agreement with findings of other researchers. Pole figures and thin section observations of the laminated carbonate samples indicate that poles to (001) of kaolinite and illite are strongly aligned normal to bedding. Clay-preferred orientation is probably responsible for some of the observed V p anisotropy. The V p anisotropy in calcareous claystones is found to be correlated to calcite content, in contrast to the relation found by others for pelagic chalks and limestones, suggesting a dependence upon lithology. Most of the anisotropy in laminated calcareous claystones appears to be controlled by flat pores oriented parallel to bedding, which could slow acoustic waves traveling perpendicular to bedding. Pelagic chalks and limestones tend to have irregularly shaped pores that do not affect anisotropy in the same way as in calcareous claystones.
KeywordsPrefer Orientation Pole Figure Ocean Drilling Program Calcite Content Velocity Anisotropy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bachman, R.T., 1979. Acoustic anisotropy in marine sediments and sedimentary rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 84, p. 7661–7663.Google Scholar
- Carlson, R.L., C.H. Schaftenaar, and R.P. Moore, 1983. Causes of compressional-wave anisotropy in calcareous sediments from the Rio Grande Rise. In: Barker, P.F., R.L. Carlson, D.A. Johnson, et al., Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, 72. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, p. 565–576.Google Scholar
- Fryer, G.J., 1986. Transverse isotropy and the thickness of layer 2A (abstract). EOS Transactions, American Geophysical Union, v. 67, p. 1083.Google Scholar
- Mann, U. and G. Muller, 1979. X-ray mineralogy of Deep Sea Drilling Project Legs 51 through 53, Western North Atlantic. In: Donnelly, T., J. Francheteau, W. Bryan, P. Robinson, M. Flowers, M. Salisbury, et al., Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, 51–53 pt. 2. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, p. 721–729.Google Scholar
- O’Brien, D.K., 1985. Strain estimation and sense of shear determination in phyllonites and ultramylonites based on phyllosilicate preferred orientation. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 118 p.Google Scholar
- O’Brien, D.K. and M.H. Manghnani, 1992. Physical properties of ODP Site 762: a comparison of shipboard and shore-based results. In: Haq, B.U., U. von Rad, S. O’Connell, et al., Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, 122. Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, Texas, p. 349–362.Google Scholar
- Schultz, L.G., 1964. Quantitative interpretation of mineralogical composition from x-ray and chemical data for the Pierre Shale. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 391-C, p. 1–31.Google Scholar
- Shipboard Scientific Party, 1987. Site 603. In: van Hinte, J.E., S.W. Wise, Jr., et al., Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, 93. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, p. 25–276.Google Scholar
- Shipboard Scientific Party, 1990. Site 762. In: Haq, B.U., U. von Rad, S. O’Connell, et al., Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Initial Reports, 122. Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, Texas, p. 213–288.Google Scholar
- Wenk, H.-R., 1985. Measurement of pole figures. In: Wenk, H.-R. (ed.), Preferred orientation in deformed metals and rocks: an introduction to modern texture analysis. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, p. 11–47.Google Scholar