Mind, Object, Object, Artifact II

  • Richard Bunt


In this paper, I should like to reflect on what has to take place for a piece of stone to become a “club,” for a hole in a rock face to become a “cave,” for a configuration of the earth’s surface to become a profile on a “horizon.”


Cultural Practice Physical Object Physical World Cultural Scheme Generic Entity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Broadbent, G., Bunt, R., and Jencks, C., 1980, “Signs, Symbols, and Architecture,” John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  2. Bunt, R., forthcoming, “The Circle, Sign and Artefact,” John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  3. Glanville, R., 1978, What is memory, that it can remember what it is, in: “Proceedings of Second International Conference on Cognitive Cybernetics,” Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B., 1969, “The Psychology of the Child,” Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  5. Schnieder, B., 1978, “Experiences in Architectural Theory,” Univ. of Ontario, Waterloo.Google Scholar
  6. Van Eyck, A., 1966, Untitled lecture to the School of Architecture, Univ. of Delft, unpublished mimeo.Google Scholar
  7. Von Glasersfeld, E., 1976, “The Psychology of Cognition,” ODELAS.Google Scholar
  8. Wells, R., 1977, Criteria for semiosis, in: “A Perfusion of Signs,” T. A. Sebeok, ed., Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Bunt
    • 1
  1. 1.Portsmouth Polytechnic School of ArchitecturePortsmouthEngland

Personalised recommendations