Advertisement

Semiotics 1980 pp 455-465 | Cite as

What is Evidence Evidence of?

  • Peter H. Salus

Abstract

On Friday, March 4, 1881, Inspector Tobias Gregson of Scotland Yard informed Mr. Sherlock Holmes of “A bad business at 3, Lauriston Gardens, off the Brixton Road.” There an American named Enoch J. Drebber had been murdered, and no clue -- or no clue apparent to Gregson and his colleague Le-strade -- was present, save the letters “R-A-C-H-E” scrawled in blood along the wall. To Gregson and Lestrade the letters are evidence of a crime of passion, for the victim was quite obviously trying to write the woman’s name, “Rachel,” in his own blood before expiring. To Holmes, who wraps up the entire affair over the weekend, the writing read Rache, the word for “revenge” in German. Watson was overwhelmed, but no more than were the readers of Beeton’s Christmas Annual in 1887.

Keywords

Scarlet Fever Planetary Body Eyewitness Testimony Magical Thinking World Series 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Rererences

  1. Barzun, J., and Graff, H.F.,1957, “The Modern Researcher,” Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York.Google Scholar
  2. Brentano, F.,1966, “The True and the Evident,” ed. by O. Kraus; transi. by R.M. Chisholm et al., Humanities Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bronstein, D.A., 1974, Love Canal and Legal Precedent, Science, 209: 1470.Google Scholar
  4. Bruntz, S., Cleveland, W., Graedel, T., and Kleiner, B., 1974, Ozone concentration in New Jersey and New York, Science, 189: 257–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleveland, W., Graedel, T., Kleiner, B., and Warner, J.L., 1974, Sunday and workday variations in photochemical air pollutants, Science 186: 1037–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cleveland, W., Kleiner, B., McRae, J., and Warner, J., 1976a, Photochemical air pollution…, Science 191: 179–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleveland, W., Kleiner, B., and Warner, J., 1976b, Robust statistical methods and photochemical air pollution data, J. Air Poll. Control Assn., 26: 36–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleveland, W., and Graedel, T., 1979, Photochemical air pollution in the Northeast United States, Science 204: 1273–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deese, J., 1974–75, Mind and Metaphor: A Commentary, New Literary History, 6: 211–217.Google Scholar
  10. Diaconis, P., 1980, Magical thinking in the analysis of scientific data, Technical Report. 154, Department of Statistics, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  11. Efron, B., 1971, Does an observed sequence of numbers follow a simple rule? ( Another look at Bode’s Law ), J. Amer. Stat. Assn., 66: 552–559.Google Scholar
  12. Good, I.J., 1968, A subjective evaluation of Bode’s Law and an objective test for approximate numerical rationality, J. Amer. Stat. Assn., 64: 23–66.Google Scholar
  13. Gould, S.J., 1980, “The Panda’s Thumb,” W.W. Norton, New York. Loftus, E.F., 1979,“Eyewitness Testimony,” Harvard U.P., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  14. Phillips, D., 1972, Deathday and Birthday: An unexpected connection, in:“Statistics: A Guide to the Unknown,” J.M. Tanner et al., eds., Holden Day, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  15. Price, H.H., 1969, “Belief,” George Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter H. Salus
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Arts and SciencesUniversity of North FloridaJacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations