Advertisement

Semiotics 1980 pp 355-364 | Cite as

Comparative Adjectives in Terms of Peirce’s Phenomenological Categories

  • Sarah O’Dowd

Abstract

This paper explores ways in which semiotic concepts of Charles Sanders Peirce illuminate the meaning-potential of English comparative adjectives. Having classified all phenomena into categories of Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness, Peirce describes the three degrees of adjectives in terms of these categories: “Firstness is the mode of being of that which is such as it is, positively and without reference to anything else” (Hardwick, 1977: 24). The uncompared positive degree of an adjective such as red or hard, then, is Peirce’s example of Firstness. We return to this idea later.

Keywords

Semantic Space Comparative Form Chicago Linguistic Society Comparative Clause Comparative Morpheme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bierwisch, M., 1967, Some semantic universals of German adjectivals, Foundations of Language, 3: 1–36.Google Scholar
  2. Bolinger, D., 1972, “Degree Words,” Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  3. Bresnan, J.W., 1973, Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English, Linguistic Inquiry, 4: 275–343.Google Scholar
  4. Buchler, J., ed., 1955, “Philosophical Writings of Peirce,” Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Deese, J., 1964, The associative structure of some common English adjectives, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3: 347–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehri, L.C., and Ammon, P.R., 1972, The development of antonym adjective structures in children. (Final report, project no. 0-I-045, U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare), University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  7. Evens, M.W., Litowitz, B.E., Markowitz, J.A., Smith, R.N., and Werner, O., 1980, “Lexical-semantic Relations: A Comparative Survey,” Linguistic Research, Inc., Carbondale and Edmonton.Google Scholar
  8. Fillmore, C.J., 1965, Entailment rules in a semantic theory. (POLA report 10 ), Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
  9. Givón, T., 1970, Notes on the semantic structure of English adjectives, Language, 46: 816–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hardwick, C.S., ed., 1977, “Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby,” Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  11. Katz, J.J., 1972, “Semantic Theory,” Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Lakoff, G., 1972, Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts, Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistic Society, 183–228.Google Scholar
  13. Lyons, J., 1979, “Semantics I,” Cambridge University Press Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. O’Dowd, S.C., 1976, Children’s acquisition of comparative and superlative adjectives, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Brown University.Google Scholar
  15. Osgood, C.E., Suci, G., and Tannenbaum, P.H., 1957, “Measurement of Meaning,” University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  16. Rosch, E.H., 1973, On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories, in: “Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language,” T.E. Moore, ed., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Sapir, E., 1944, Grading: A study in semantics, Philosophy of Science, 11: 93–116. (Reprinted in: “Selected Writings of Edward Sapir,” D.G. Mandelbaum, ed., 1963, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles. )CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shapiro, M., 1976, “Asymmetry: An Inquiry into the Linguistic Structure of Poetry,” S.C. Dik and J.G. Kooij, ed., (North-Holland Linguistic Series: 26 ), NorthHolland Publishing Co, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  19. Stern, G., 1931, “Meaning and Change of Meaning,” Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag, Gtlteborg. (Reprinted, 1965, Indiana University Press, Bloomington. )Google Scholar
  20. Van Overbeke, M., 1975, Antonymie et gradation, Linguistique, 11/1: 135–54, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah O’Dowd
    • 1
  1. 1.Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations