Advertisement

Theory and Practice at the Crossroads — A Peircean Perpsective on Political Signs

  • Maryann Ayim

Abstract

Peirce uttered these words on February 10th, 1898, at Cambridge, Massachusetts, by way of introducing his lecture on “Philosophy and the Conduct of Life”.2 Over eighty-two years later, I begin my address in a tone dramatically opposed to Peirce’s. For I must reveal that I stand before you a Peircean and a feminist, searching in Peirce’s pragmatic philosophy for guidance in understanding and solving some of the many problems identified and delineated by feminist thinkers. I seek, in other words, to resurrect the Hellenic tendency spurned by Peirce, and to use Peirce’s own writing to this end. I shall look first at Peirce’s writing on practical affairs, and argue that although it throws light on certain feminist issues, it is not very helpful in terms of practical guidance. Then I shall turn to Peirce analysis of theoretical science, showing that this area of Peirce’s writing is extremely fertile in implications for feminist theory and practice.

Keywords

Feminist Theory Important Matter Feminist Issue Feminist Ideal Theoretical Science 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Broverman, Inge K., Broverman, Donald M., Clarkson, Frank E., Rosenkrantz, Paul S., and Voge, Susan R., Sex-Role Stereotypes and Clinical Judgments of Mental Health, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,Vol. 34, No. 1 (1970), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Broverman, Inge K., Sex-Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal, Journal of Social Issues, Vo. 28, No. 2 (1972), 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fischer, L., and Cheyne, J.A., 1977, “Sex Roles: Biological and Cultural Interactions as Found in Social Science Research and Ontario Educational Media,” The Ministry of Education, Toronto.Google Scholar
  4. Haack, Susan, Towards a Pragmatist Social Philosophy for Feminism, A paper presented in draft form at The University of Guelph in 1978 and (revised) at the University of Cape Town in 1979.Google Scholar
  5. Maccoby, Eleanor Emmons and Jacklin, Carol Nagy, 1974, “The Psychology of Sex Differences”, Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
  6. Peirce, Charles Sanders, “The Charles S. Peirce Papers;” Manuscript Collection in the Houghton Library, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Peirce, Charles Sanders, 1931–1958, “Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce,” 8 volumes, Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and Arthur Burks, eds., Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Pierce, Christine, 1977, Natural Law Language and Women, Sex Equality, Jane English, ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, pp. 130–142.Google Scholar
  9. Popper, K.R., 1966, “The Open Society and its Enemies,” 2 vols., 5th ed. rev.; Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  10. Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., and Broverman, D., Sex-Role Stereotypes and Self-Concepts in College Students, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 3 (1968), 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tavris, Carol and Offir, Carole, 1977, “The Longest War: Sex Differences in Perspective,” Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maryann Ayim
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations