Advertisement

Hydroson Cleaning of Surfaces

  • Robert Walker

Abstract

Hydroson generators produce sonic waves in solutions, and the system can be fitted to a tank to clean immersed, contaminated articles. It was patented(1) in 1973 and then developed and transferred to the new company Nickerson Ultrason Ltd. in 1976. It is now widely used with over 150 installations employed in Europe, Japan, South Africa, and the USA.

Keywords

Ultrasonic Irradiation Zinc Phosphate Ultrasonic Cleaning Product Finish Diffusion Layer Thickness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nickerson Ultrason Ltd., British Patent 1,475,307 (1973).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hydrosonics, a sound approach to surface cleaning, Product Finishing 29(10), 11 (1976).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Component cleaning using the Hydroson system, Finishing Industries 2(12), 23–25 (1978).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. R. Frederick, Ultrasonic Engineering, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1965).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Clough, Wire and strip cleaning by Hydroson, Wire Industry 46, 491–492 (1979).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. J. Godfrey, Cavitation damage in: Corrosion (L. L. Shreir, ed.), Vol. 1, pp. 8:124–132, Newnes-Butterworth Press, London and Boston (1976).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. T. Walker and R. Walker, New explanation for the hardening effect of ultrasound on electrodeposits, Nature 244, 141–142 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Walker and C. T. Walker, Hardening of immersed metals by ultrasound, Nature 250, 410–411 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Walker and N. S. Holt, A quantitative evaluation of the Hydroson cleaning system, Product Finishing 33(4), 14–16 (1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Walker, The efficiency of ultrasonic cleaning, Plating Surface Finishing 72(1), 63–70 (1985).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Walker and N. S. Holt, Determination of the flow rate in the Hydroson cleaning system, Surface Technol. 17, 147–156 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Walker and N. S. Holt, Determination of the Nernst diffusion layer thickness in the Hydroson agitation tank, Surface Technol. 22, 165–174 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Walker, Electrodeposition from Hydrosonically agitated solutions, Thin Solid Films 119, 223–240 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hydroson Cleaning Systems, Leaflet, Nickerson Ultrason Ltd., Warley, England.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    I. A. Thomson, The Hydroson system—A sound system for saving, Product Finishing 31(3), 29–31 (1978).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The Hydroson cleaning system, Finishing Industries 4(12), 28–30 (1980).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. Allen, Hydroson improves pre-anodising cleaning efficiency, Product Finishing 36(4), 33–34 (1983).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    I. A. Thomson, Hydroson scores a century, Product Finishing 34(10), 54–55 (1981).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Clough, Progress on in-line wire cleaning, Wire Industry 47, 690–691 (1980).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    I. A. Thomson, In-line wire cleaning with the Hydroson system, Fine Wires Conference, Aachen (Oct 30–31, 1980), International Wire and Machinery Association, Oxted, Surrey, UK (1980).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Walker and N. S. Holt, The role of Hydrosonic agitation on the electrodeposition of zinc from a zincate bath, Plating Surface Finishing 67(5), 92–96 (1980).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. Walker and N. S. Holt, Recovery of zinc powder by electrodeposition from dilute zincate solutions, Chem. Ind. 1985 (19), 783–785 (1985).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Mesmer, Acoustic vibration cleaning system, Technica (Switzerland) 30(5), 368–370 (1980).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    F. L. Rohling, Hydroson: new cleaning technique for metal surfaces, in: Proceedings of the International Congress on Surface Technology, Berlin (1981); World Surface Coatings Abs. 57(492), 3718 (1983).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. J. v. Wessem, Hydroson cleaning process, environmentally acceptable and economical, Oppervlakelechniken. (Surface Techniques) (Delft) 26(4), 103–107 (1982).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Mayer and S. Shwartzman, Megasonic cleaning system, U.S. Patent 3,893,769 (July 8, 1975).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Shwartzman, A. Mayer, and W. Kern, Megasonic particle removal from solid-state wafers, RCA Review 46(1), 81–105 (1985).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Mayer and S. Shwartzman, Megasonic cleaning: A new cleaning and drying system for use in semiconductor processing, J. Electronic Mater. 8, 855–864 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    C. T. Walker and R. Walker, Hardening effect of ultrasonic agitation on copper electrodepos-its, J. Electrochem. Soc. 124(5), 661–669 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. O’Donoghue, Ultrasonic cleaning in this treatise.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    A Comparison of Cleaning Methods, Hydroson vs. Ultrasonics, Leaflet, Nickerson Ultrason Ltd, Warley, England.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Walker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of SurreyUK

Personalised recommendations