An Approach to School Interlocution Situations Analysis of a Few Examples

  • M. Brossard

Abstract

For many reasons the research into the inequalities of school success in relation to social origin has been led to take into consideration children’s verbal behaviour. At first researchers tried to discover the “characteristics” of the language spoken by children from a particular social circle. They thought that it would provide an explanatory “variable”. It became rapidly clear that to analyse the functioning of speech in a relevant manner it was necessary to take into consideration the production situation. In fact if the situations are diversified, it can be noticed that the child has no own language but that he makes a different use of his mother language according to the constraints of the situation in which he finds himself (Robinson, 1965; Lanton 1969; Cazden 1972).

Keywords

Mete Preconceive 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bourdieu P., 1977, L’économie des échanges linguistiques, LANGUE FRANCAISE, 34, MaiGoogle Scholar
  2. Brossard M., 1979, Conduites verbales, activités cognitives et milieu social, Thèse de Doctorat présentée devant l’Université de Bordeaux II, fév.Google Scholar
  3. Cazden C.B., 1972, The Situation: A Neglected Source of Social Class Differences in Language Use, in Sociolinguistics, Pride and Holmes eds., Penguin Modern Linguistic Readings, PP 294–313.Google Scholar
  4. Cherkaoui M., 1979, Les paradoxes de la réussite scolaire, P.U.F., Paris.Google Scholar
  5. C.I.E.L.E. in Psychologie et Education, 1978, Université de Toulouse le Mirail, nr. 4 vol. II, Déc.Google Scholar
  6. Coulthard M., 1977, An Introduction to Discourse Analysis, Longman Group Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards A.D., 1976, Speech codes and speech variants, Child Language, vol. 3, 247–265.Google Scholar
  8. Gilly M., 1978, Enseignant-Enseigné, rôles institutionnels et représentations, Thèse de Doctorat présentée devant 1’ Université de Paris V, Avril.Google Scholar
  9. Grice H.P., 1979, Logique et conversation in Syntax et Semantics, vol. III, Cole and Morgan eds., New-York, Academie Press 1973, Trad. in Communications, Seuil, 30.Google Scholar
  10. Gumperz J.J., 1980, Conversational Inference and Classroom Learning, To be published in Judith Green and Cynthia Wallat eds. Ethnographie Approaches to face to face Interaction. Ablex Publishing Co., Spring.Google Scholar
  11. Halliday M.A.K., 1975, Learning How to mean, Ed. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  12. Labov W., 1976, Sociolinguistique, Ed. de Minuit, Paris.Google Scholar
  13. Labov W., 1978, Le parler ordinaire, Ed. de Minuit, Paris.Google Scholar
  14. Lawton D., 1968, Social Class, Language and Education, Routledge and Kegan Paul, ed. London.Google Scholar
  15. Robinson W.F., 1965, The elaborated code in working class language, Language and Speech, vol. VIII, PP. 243–252.Google Scholar
  16. Searle J.R., 1972, Les actes de langage, essai de philosophie du langage, Paris, Herman.Google Scholar
  17. Sinclair J. Mch., Coulthard R.M., 1975, Towards an Analysis of Discourse, Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
  18. Though J., 1977, The Development of Meaning, J. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Brossard
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BordeauxBordeauxFrance

Personalised recommendations