Remarks on Direct Questions and Direct Answers

  • W. Van Langendonck


I would like to analyse an ordinary yes-no question (YNQ) as an epistemic request containing a disjunction of propositions. The latter constitute the set of possible direct answers to the YNQ (Hiz, 1978; Manor 1979).


Semantic Representation Answer System Direct Question Direct Answer Polarity Item 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bennett, W.A., 1976, Assertion, declaration and interrogation in French and English. Folia Linguistica, 10, 227–288.Google Scholar
  2. Bolinger, D., 1978, Yes-no questions are not alternative questions. in Hiz, 87–105.Google Scholar
  3. Borkin Ann, 1971, Polarity items in questions. Papers from the 7th Regional Meeting CLS: 53–62.Google Scholar
  4. Hiz H., 1978, Questions; Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  5. Hurford J.R., 1973, Deriving S from S — IS; in “Syntax and Semantics 2” J. Kimball ed., 247–299, New York & London.Google Scholar
  6. Lakoff R., 1969, Some reasons why there can’t be any some-any rule; Language, 54: 608–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Manor, Ruth, 1979, A language for questions and answers; Theoretical Linguistics 6, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pope Emily N., 1976, Questions and answers in English (Janua Linguarum ser. pract. 225); The Hague:Mouton.Google Scholar
  9. Searle J., 1976, A classification of illocutionary acts, Language in Society 5: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Seuren P.A.M., 1975, Tussen taal en denken; een bijdrage tot de empirische funderingen van de semantiek; Utrecht: Oosthoek.Google Scholar
  11. Seuren P.A.M., 1979, The logic of presuppositional semantics; Preprint Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Van Langendonck
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LouvainLouvainBelgium

Personalised recommendations