Abstract
Let us first make a pragmatic point. Any utterance, no matter how well constructed from a grammarian’s, a logician’s or even a semanticis’a point of view is meaningless for a hearer, unless he can somehow relate it to his own expectations, unless he somehow knows what the piece of information given to him is for.
Reprinted by permission of the R.P.A.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Comrie Bernard, 1976, “Aspect”, Cambridge University Press.
Janta-Polczynski Martin, 1974, “The dialectics of Questions and Answers”; Philips Research Reports, M.B.L.E., nr. R 265.
Lehnert Wendy, 1977, “Human and Computational Question-Answering”, Cognitive Science I nr. 1.
Moody Raymond, A. Jr., 1978, “Reflections on “Life after Life”; Corgi: London p. 129.
Scragg Greg William, 1974, “Answering Questions about Processes”; Ph. D. Thesis: University of California; San Diego.
Schank Roger C.; Goldman Neil M.; Rieger Charles J.; Riesbeck Christopher K., 1975, “Conceptual Information Processing”. North-Holland: Amsterdam.
Schank Roger; The Yale A.I. Group, 1975a, “Sam — a Story Understander” Dept. of Computer Science Research Report nr. 43; Yale University: New Haven, CT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Janta-Polczynski, M. (1982). The “Range” of a Question as a Perceived Intention of the Scope of Information Needed. In: Lowenthal, F., Vandamme, F., Cordier, J. (eds) Language and Language Acquisition. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9099-2_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9099-2_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9101-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9099-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive