The “Range” of a Question as a Perceived Intention of the Scope of Information Needed
Let us first make a pragmatic point. Any utterance, no matter how well constructed from a grammarian’s, a logician’s or even a semanticis’a point of view is meaningless for a hearer, unless he can somehow relate it to his own expectations, unless he somehow knows what the piece of information given to him is for.
KeywordsPragmatic Point Computer Science Research Story Context General World Knowledge People Mind
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Comrie Bernard, 1976, “Aspect”, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Janta-Polczynski Martin, 1974, “The dialectics of Questions and Answers”; Philips Research Reports, M.B.L.E., nr. R 265.Google Scholar
- Lehnert Wendy, 1977, “Human and Computational Question-Answering”, Cognitive Science I nr. 1.Google Scholar
- Moody Raymond, A. Jr., 1978, “Reflections on “Life after Life”; Corgi: London p. 129.Google Scholar
- Scragg Greg William, 1974, “Answering Questions about Processes”; Ph. D. Thesis: University of California; San Diego.Google Scholar
- Schank Roger C.; Goldman Neil M.; Rieger Charles J.; Riesbeck Christopher K., 1975, “Conceptual Information Processing”. North-Holland: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Schank Roger; The Yale A.I. Group, 1975a, “Sam — a Story Understander” Dept. of Computer Science Research Report nr. 43; Yale University: New Haven, CT.Google Scholar