The “Range” of a Question as a Perceived Intention of the Scope of Information Needed

  • Martin Janta-Polczynski


Let us first make a pragmatic point. Any utterance, no matter how well constructed from a grammarian’s, a logician’s or even a semanticis’a point of view is meaningless for a hearer, unless he can somehow relate it to his own expectations, unless he somehow knows what the piece of information given to him is for.


Pragmatic Point Computer Science Research Story Context General World Knowledge People Mind 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Comrie Bernard, 1976, “Aspect”, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Janta-Polczynski Martin, 1974, “The dialectics of Questions and Answers”; Philips Research Reports, M.B.L.E., nr. R 265.Google Scholar
  3. Lehnert Wendy, 1977, “Human and Computational Question-Answering”, Cognitive Science I nr. 1.Google Scholar
  4. Moody Raymond, A. Jr., 1978, “Reflections on “Life after Life”; Corgi: London p. 129.Google Scholar
  5. Scragg Greg William, 1974, “Answering Questions about Processes”; Ph. D. Thesis: University of California; San Diego.Google Scholar
  6. Schank Roger C.; Goldman Neil M.; Rieger Charles J.; Riesbeck Christopher K., 1975, “Conceptual Information Processing”. North-Holland: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  7. Schank Roger; The Yale A.I. Group, 1975a, “Sam — a Story Understander” Dept. of Computer Science Research Report nr. 43; Yale University: New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Janta-Polczynski
    • 1
  1. 1.BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations