Advertisement

Nuclear Spin Relaxation Studies of Elastin, II. A Preliminary Investigation of the Effects of Stretching and Solvent Composition on Proton Transverse Relaxation

  • G. E. Ellis
  • K. J. Packer
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 79)

Abstract

In part I (1) we reported, inter alia, a study of the proton magnetic transverse relaxation characteristics of D20-exchanged and -hydrated elastin. The observed proton free induction decays (FID’s) were found to be describable in terms of a superposition of three independent transverse relaxation processes, the fastest being Gaussian in character, the two slower ones being exponential. These three processes were assigned to protons in three “sites” in the elastin each having sufficiently different motional characteristics to ensure that the transverse relaxation behaviour in each site was quite distinct. The shortest relaxation time site, which showed Gaussian relaxation behaviour, was assigned to protons 1n the regions of the crosslinks whilst the other two (exponential) relaxation time components were interpreted in terms of two sites having different water contents and overall mobilities.

Keywords

Relaxation Time Block Copolymer Solvent Composition Free Induction Decay Rotational Correlation Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ellis, G.E. and Packer, K.J. (1976) Biopolymers, 15, 813–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Partridge, S. M. (1966) in “The Physiology and Biochemistry of Muscle as a Food” (Briskey, E. J., Cassens, R. G. and Trautman, J. C., Eds.) pp. 327–337, Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Partridge, S. M. (1968) in “Symposium on Fibrous Proteins” (Crewther, W. G., Ed.) pp. 246–264, Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weis-Fogh, T. and Andersen, S. O. (1970) Nature, 227, 718–721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gray, W. R., Sandberg, L. B. and Foster, J. A. (1973), Nature 246, 461–466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Urry, D. W. (1976) Discussions of the Faraday Society, 61, in press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meiboom, S. and Gill, D. (1958) Rev. Sci. Instr., 29, 688–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abragam, A. (1961) “The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism”, Ch. X p. 439, O.U.P.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Packer, K. J. and Tomlinson, D. J. (1971), Trans. Faraday Soc., 67, 1302–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rasmussen, D. H. and MacKenzie, A. P., (1968), Nature 220, 1315–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoeve, C. A. J. and Flory, P. J. (1974) Biopolymers 13, 677–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. E. Ellis
    • 1
  • K. J. Packer
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Chemical SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwich, NorfolkUK

Personalised recommendations