A 13C Magnetic Resonance Study of Embryonic Chick Aorta

  • D. A. Torchia
  • C. E. Sullivan
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 79)


13C nmr spectra of defatted aorta, obtained from chick embryos, ranging in age from 13 to 20 days, showed that linewidths were independent of the age of the embryo, this, in spite of the fact that crosslinking increases with age. As expected the dipolar decoupled spectrum of defatted aorta had a larger C-H signal intensity than the scalar decoupled spectrum, since collagen in the sample contributes signal intensity only in the former case. Significantly, the dipolar decoupled spectrum of autoclaved aorta also had a larger C-H signal intensity. This result indicates that ca. 30% of the carbons in the tissue, swollen by 0.15 M NaCl, has restricted motion at 37°. Preliminary data indicate that tissue culture techniques can be used to enrich specific amino acids in chick aorta with 13C thereby affording a means to study possible differences in molecular structure of the chemically distinct regions in elastin.


Chick Embryo Specific Amino Acid Magnetic Resonance Study Elastic Tissue Tissue Culture Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Weis-Fogh, T. and Andersen, S.O. (1970), Nature (London) 227, 718–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mistrali, F., Volpin, D., Gariboldo, G.B. and Ciferri, A. (1971), J. Phys. Chem. 75, 142–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoeve, C.A.J. and Flory, P.J. (1974) Biopolymers 13, 677–686.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mukherjee, D.P., Hoffman, A.S. and Franzblau, C. (1974) Biopolymers 13, 2447–2459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dorrington, K., Grut, W. and McCrum, N.G. (1975) Nature (London) 255, 476–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lyerla, J.R., Jr. and Torchia, D.A. (1975) Biochemistry 14, 5175–5183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Torchia, D.A. and Piez, K.A. (1973) J. Mol. Biol. 76, 419–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pines, A., Gibby, M.G. and Waugh, J.S. (1973) J. Chem. Phys. 59, 569–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gibby, M.G., Pines, A. and Waugh, J.S. (1972) Chem. Phys. Letters 16, 296–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schaefer, J., Stejskal, E.O. and Buchdahl, R. (1975) Macromolecules, 8, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Torchia, D.A. and VanderHart, D.L. (1976) J. Mol. Biol. 104, 315–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller, E.J., Martin, G.R. and Piez, K.A. (1964) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 17, 248–253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Partridge, S.M., Davis, H.F. and Adair, G.S. (1955) Biochem. J. 61, 11–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gray, W.R., Sandberg, L.B. and Foster, J.A. (1973) Nature (London) 246, 461–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Foster, J.A., Rubin, L., Kagan, H.M., Franzblau, C., Bruenger, E. and Sandberg, L.B. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 6191–6196.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Torchia
    • 1
  • C. E. Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of BiochemistryNational Institute of Dental ResearchBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations