Some Kinetic Aspects of Crosslink Biosynthesis

  • W. R. Gray
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 79)


Given enough time, a mixture of chemicals will undergo a series of reactions until it reaches an equilibrium. At equilibrium there may be a complex mixture of products, or an overwhelming preponderance of a few. Biochemical systems are not at equilibrium, fortunately. Reactions of organic molecules in neutral aqueous solutions are relatively slow, so the chemical make-up is largely determined by kinetic constraints. Millions of possible reactions could occur in the enormously complex mixture of biochemical substances, but most of them proceed at vanishingly small rates under normal physiological conditions. We are, therefore, used to the notion that living organisms control their chemistry by using enzymes to catalyze a relatively small number of the possible reactions. In this way they can channel nutrients into specific pathways for the efficient release of energy, or build them up into other needed molecules such as proteins and nucleic acids. Almost instinctively, we now feel that biochemical processes are completely determined in this way, that they will go by one fixed route, uniquely fixed by the presence of an enzyme for each step. I propose that this is not an adequate way of looking at processes such as the crosslinking of elastin, unless perhaps we regard elastin itself as an enzyme.


Lysyl Oxidase Kinetic Aspect Efficient Release Neutral Aqueous Solution Local Conformation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Miller, E.J., Pinnen, S.R., Martin, G.R. and Schiffmann, E., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 26, 132 (1967).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomas, J., Elsden, D.F. and Partridge, S.M., Nature 200, 651 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Franzblau, C., Sinex, M., Faris, B., and Lampidis, R., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 21 575 (1965).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lent, R., and Franzblau, C, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 26, 43 (1967).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Starcher, B.C., Partridge, S.M., and Elsden, D.F., Biochemistry 6, 2425 (1967).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, N.R. and Anwar, R.A., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 92, 3778 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Piez, K.A., Ann. Rev. Biochem. 37, 547 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sandberg, L.B., Weissman, N., and Gray, W.R., Biochemistry 10, 52 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gray, W.R., Sandberg, L.B., and Foster, J.A., Nature 246, 461 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Francis, G., Rhys, J., and Thomas, J., Biochem. J. 136, 45 (1973).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foster, J.A., Rubin, L., Kagan, H.M., Franzblau, C, Bruenger, E., and Sandberg, L.B., J. Biol. Chem. 249, 6191 (1974).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12a.
    Gerber, G.E. and Anwar, R.A., J. Biol. Chem. 249, 5200 (1974)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 12b.
    Gerber, G.E. and Anwar, R.A., Biochem J. 149, 685 (1975).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. R. Gray
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations