Relationships, Origins, and History of the Ceboid Monkeys and Caviomorph Rodents: A Modern Reinterpretation

  • Robert Hoffstetter

Abstract

This modest essay is dedicated to Dr. George Gaylord Simpson, to acknowledge my admiration for the man and his work. The reading of his publications has been for me very enriching. But, more than his discoveries and the results of his studies, both considerable, I appreciate his rigorous and penetrating mentality, his courageous attitude with respect to ideas received, his scientific honesty which obliges him to reconsider syntheses in the light of new facts. This is why I have chosen a theme where, following the line of conduct of which he is an example, I have voiced some opinions which diverge from those he has defended and which I myself have long adopted.

Keywords

Cretaceous Miocene Pleistocene Eocene Egypt 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Broom, R. 1926. On the mammalian presphenoid and mesethmoid bones. Proc. Zool. Soc. 1926: 257–264.Google Scholar
  2. Broom, R. 1927. Some further points on the structure of the mammalian basicranail axis. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1927: 233–244.Google Scholar
  3. Brundin, L. 1966. Transantarctic relationships and their significance, as evidenced by Chironomid midges. K. Svenska Vetensk. Akad. Handl., (4. ser.) 11(1):472 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, T. W. M. 1960. Southern intercontinental connections and the origin of the southern mammals. In Evolution: its science and doctrine (Symposium Roy. Soc. Canada, 1959). 79–89. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, W. E. LeGros. 1959. The Antecedents of Man. Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
  6. Darlington, P. J. 1965. Biogeography of the Southern End of the World. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dietz, R. S., and J. C. Holden. 1970. The breakup of Pangaea. Sci. Amer., 223(4):30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Durette-Desset, M. C. 1971 (unpublished). Essai de classification des Nématodes Helig-mosomes. Corrélations avec la paléobiogéographie des hôtes. Thèse Doctorat Sc. Nat., Univ. Paris (Orsay) Sud.Google Scholar
  9. Ellerman, J. R. 1940. The Families and Genera of Living Rodents. Vol. 1, Rodents other than Muridae. London, British Museum (Nat. Hist.).Google Scholar
  10. Emry, R. J. 1970. A North American Oligocene pangolin and other additions to the Pholidota. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 142(6):455–510.Google Scholar
  11. Funnell, B. M., and A. G. Smith, 1968. Opening of the Atlantic Ocean. Nature (London), 219:1328–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Genet-Varcin, E. 1963. Les Singes Actuels et Fossiles. Paris, Boubée & Cie.Google Scholar
  13. Genet-Varcin, E. 1969. A la Recherche du Primate Ancêtre de l’Homme. Paris, Boubée & Cie.Google Scholar
  14. Guthrie, D. A. 1963. The carotid circulation in the Rodentia. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 128(10):457–481.Google Scholar
  15. Guthrie, D. A. 1969. The carotid circulation in the Aplodontia. J. Mammal., 50:1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana, Chicago, and London, University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hill, W. C. O. 1953–1966. Primates, Comparative Anatomy and Taxonomy. 6 vols. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hoffstetter, R. 1954. Les Mammiféres fossiles de l’Amérique du Sud et la biogéographie. Rev. Gén. Sci., 51(11–12):348–378.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffstetter, R. 1968. Un gisement de Mammiféres déséadiens (Oligocéne inférieur) en Bolivie. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) [D], 267:1095–1097.Google Scholar
  20. Hoffstetter, R. 1969. Un Primate de l’Oligocéne inférieur sud-américain: Branisella boliviana gen. et sp. nov. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) [D], 269:434–437.Google Scholar
  21. Hoffstetter, R. 1970. Radiation initiale des Mammiféres Placentaires et biogéographie. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris [D], 270:3027–3030.Google Scholar
  22. Hoffstetter, R. 1970b. L’historire biogéographique des Marsupiaux et la dichotomie Marsupiaux-Placentaires. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) [D], 271–388–391.Google Scholar
  23. Hoffstetter, R. (in press). Le peuplement mammalien de l’Amérique du Sud. Rôle des continents austraux comme centres d’origine, de diversification et de dispersion pour certains groupes mammaliens. An. I Simposio Brasil. Paleont. (Rio de Janeiro, Sept. 1970) = suppl. An. Acad. Brasil. Ciencias.Google Scholar
  24. Hoffstetter, R. and R. Lavocat, 1970. Découverte dans le Déséadien de Bolivie de genres pentalophodontes appuyant les affinités africaines des Rongeurs Caviomorphes. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) [D], 271:172–175.Google Scholar
  25. Kurtén, B. 1966. Holarctic land connexions in the early Tertiary. Comment. Biol. Soc. Sci. Fenn., 29(5): 1–5.Google Scholar
  26. Landry, S. O. 1957. The interrelationships of the New and Old World hystricomorph Rodents. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool., 56:1–118.Google Scholar
  27. Lavocat, R. 1969. La systématique des Rongeurs hystricomorphes et la dérive des continents. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) [D], 269:1496–1497.Google Scholar
  28. Lavocat, R. (in press). Affinités systématiques des Caviomorphes et des Phiomorphes et origine africaine des Caviomorphes. An. I Simposio Brasil. Paleont. (Rio de Janeiro, Sept. 1970) = suppl. An. Acad. Brasil. Ciencias.Google Scholar
  29. Lavocat, R. (in press). Les Rongeurs du Miocéne d’Afrique orientale. In Leaky, L. S. B., ed. Fossil Vertebrates of Africa. London and New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Le Pichon, X. 1968. Sea-floor spreading and continental drift. J. Geophys. Res., 73(12):3661–3697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKenna, M. C. 1967. Classification, range and deployment of the prosimian primates. Colloq. Intern. C.N.R.S., n 1963, Problémes actuels de Paléontologie, Evolution des Vertébrés (Paris, Juin 1966):603–610.Google Scholar
  32. Matthew, W. D. 1915. Climate and evolution. Ann. New York Acad. Sci., 24:171–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moody, P. A. and E. D. Doniger. 1955. Serological light on porcupine relationships. Evolution, 10(1):47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mossmann, H. W. and W. P. Luckett. 1968. Phylogenetic relationship of the African mole rat, Bathyergus janetta, as indicated by the fetal membranes. Amer. Zool., 8:806.Google Scholar
  35. Patterson, B., and R. Pascual, 1968. The fossil mammal fauna of South America. Quart. Rev. Biol., 43(4):409–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Piveteau, J. 1957. Primates. In Piveteau, J., ed., Traté de Paléontologie, Vol. 7. Paris, Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
  37. Reig, O. A. 1962. Las Integraciones cenogenéticas en el desarrollo de la fauna de Vertebrados tetrápodos de América del Sur. Ameghiniana, 2(8): 131–140.Google Scholar
  38. Reig, O. A. 1968. Peuplement en Vertébrés tétrapodes de l’Amérique de Sud. In Delamare-Deboutteville, C, and E. Rapoport, eds., Biologie de l’Amérique Australe, IV: 215–260, Paris (C.N.R.S.).Google Scholar
  39. Romer, A. S. 1945. Vertebrate Paleontology, 2d ed., Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Romer, A. S. 1966. Vertebrate Paleontology, 3d ed., Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Romer, A. S. 1968. Notes and Comments on Vertebrate Paleontology. Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Schaffer, F. X. 1924. Lehrbuch der Geologie, II. Teil, Grundzüge der historischen Geologie. Leipzig and Vienna, Franz Deuticke.Google Scholar
  43. Schaub, S. 1953. Remarks on the distribution and classification of the “Hystricomorpha”. Verh. Naturf. Ges. Basel, 64:389–400.Google Scholar
  44. Romer, A. S. 1958. Simplicidentata (= Rodentia). In Traité de Paléontologie, VI-2:659–818. Paris, Masson et cie.Google Scholar
  45. Simons, E. L. 1967a. New evidence on the anatomy of the earliest catarrhme Primates. In Starck, D., R. Schneider, and H. -J. Kuhn, eds. Neue Ergebnisser der Primatologie. First Congr. Intern. Primat. Soc., Frankfurt a. M., 26–30, July, 1966, pp. 15–18. Stuttgart, G. Fischer.Google Scholar
  46. Simons, E. L. 1967b. The earliest apes. Sci. Amer., 217(6):28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simpson, G. G. 1945. The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 85(1):xvi + 350 pp.Google Scholar
  48. Simpson, G. G. 1950. History of the fauna of Latin America. Amer. Sci., 38:361–389.Google Scholar
  49. Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York, Columbia University Press. 247 pp.Google Scholar
  50. Simpson, G. G. 1965. The Geography of Evolution. Philadelphia and New York, Chilton books.Google Scholar
  51. Simpson, G. G. 1966. Mammalian evolution on the Southern continents. N. Jahrb. Geol. Paläont. Abh., 125 (Festband Schindewolf): 1–18.Google Scholar
  52. Simpson, G. G. 1967. The Tertiary lorisiform primates of Africa. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 136(3):39–61.Google Scholar
  53. Simpson, G. G. 1969. South American mammals. In Fitkau, E. J., J. Lilies, H. Klinge, G. H. Schwabe, and H. Sioli, eds., Biogeography and Ecology in South America, 2:879–909. The Hague, W. Junk.Google Scholar
  54. Stehlin, H. G., and S. Schaub. 1951. Die Trigonodontie der simplicidentaten Nager. Schweiz. Paläont. Abh., 67:1–385.Google Scholar
  55. Tullberg, T. 1899. Ueber das System der Nagethiere, eine phylogenetische Studie. Nov. Acta Reg. Soc. Sci. Upsal., (3)18:1–514, A1–A18.Google Scholar
  56. Valois, H. 1955. Ordre des Primates. In Grassé, P. -P., ed., Traité de Zoologie. 17–2:1854–2206.Google Scholar
  57. Waterhouse, G. R. 1839. Observations on the Rodentia. Mag. Nat. Hist., (n.s.) 3:90–96, 184–188, 274–279, 598–600.Google Scholar
  58. Waterhouse, G. R. 1848. A Natural History of the Mammalia. Vol. 2, Rodentia. London, H. Bailliére.Google Scholar
  59. Wilson, J. A. 1966. A new primate from the earliest Oligocene, West Texas, preliminary report. Folia Primat. (Basel), 4:227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wood, A. E. 1949. A new Oligocene rodent genus from Patagonia. Amer. Mus. Novit., 1435:54 pp.Google Scholar
  61. Wood, A. E. 1950. Porcupines, paleogeography and parallelism. Evolution, 4:87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wood, A. E. 1955. A revised classification of the rodents. J. Mammal., 36:165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wood, A. E. 1959. Eocene radiation and phytogeny of the rodents. Evolution, 13(3):354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wood, A. E. 1962. The early Tertiary rodents of the family Paramyidae. Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc., (n.s.)52(1):1–261.Google Scholar
  65. Wood, A. E. 1965. Grades and clades among rodents. Evolution, 19(1): 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wood, A. E. 1968. Early Cenozoic mammalian faunas, Fayum province, Egypt. The African Oligocene Rodentia. Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist., 28:23–105.Google Scholar
  67. Wood, A. E. and B. Patterson, 1959. The rodents of the deseadan Oligocene of Patagonia and the beginnings of South American rodent evolution. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 120(3):279–428.Google Scholar
  68. Wood, A. E. and B. Patterson. 1971. Relationships among hystricognathous and hystricomorphous rodents. Mammalia, 34(4):628–639.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Meredith Corporation 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Hoffstetter
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut de Paléontologie, Muséum Nationald’Histoire NaturelleParisFrance

Personalised recommendations