Image Analysis of Proliferation and Fusion in Cultured Satellite Cells

  • Albert Le Moigne
  • Bernard Lassalle
  • Isabelle Martelly
  • Jean Gautron
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 172)


Myogenic cells were isolated from adult rat skeletal muscles and cultured in vitro. Cell proliferation was analyzed between days 1 and 14 after plating and the histological characteristics of the cultures were defined. The cell cycle phases determined by examining Feulgen-stained cultures with a cell image processor SAMBA 200. Nuclei were automatically analysed with two different methods which made it possible to analyse the nuclei of the myogenic cell populations which were either involved in each phase of the mitotic cycle, or left out of the cycle after fusion into myotubes. After 3 hr of culture 10% of the cell population was involved in the cell cycle. In the presence of fetal calf serum, this percentage increased until day 3 after plating. Histogram analysis showed that, at that time, the DNA content of 2 8, 2% of the cell population was higher than 3C, and image analysis showed that 42% of the S and G2 phase cells were involved in DNA synthesis. From day 4, the proliferation rate gradually slowed down until day 8, when less than 5% cells had a DNA content higher than 3C. After day 8, when numerous myotubes differentiated, the image analysis method revealed that the percentage of S and G2 phase cells involved in DNA synthesis had diminished to between 3 and 8%. The percentage of nuclei in G0 increased when the first myotubes differentiated around day 5. When horse serum was added to the culture medium on day 4 to enhance myotube differentiation, significant cell proliferation was observed for the first time in satellite cells before cell fusion. These methods of analysis gave the first daily pattern of myogenic cell proliferation and fusion in a cell population isolated from adult muscular tissue. This now makes it possible to study the effects of growth-promoting substances in vitro.


Fetal Calf Serum Satellite Cell Horse Serum Cell Cycle Phase Integrate Optical Density 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bischoff, R., 1986, Proliferation of muscle satellite cells in intact myofibers in culture, Dev. Biol., 115:129–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bischoff, R. and Holtzer, J., 1969, Mitosis and the processes of differentiation of myogenic cells in vitro, J. Cell. Biol., 44:188–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brugal, G., 1984, Image analysis of microscopic preparations, in: “Methods and Achievements in Experimental Pathology”, Jasmin, G. and Porschek, L., eds, Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  4. Brugal, G. and Chassery, J.M., 1971, Un nouveau Systeme d’analyse densitometrique et morphologique des preparations microscopiques, Histochemistry, 52:241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brugal, G., Garbay, C., Giroud, F. and Adelh, D., 1979, A double scanning microphotometer for image analysis: hardware, software and biomedical applications, J. Histochem. Cytochem., 27:144–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campion, D.R., 1983, The muscle satellite cell: a review, Int. Rev. Cytol., 87:225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devlin, B.H., and Koenigsberg, I.R., 1983, Re-entry into the cell cycle of differentiated skeletal myocytes, Dev. Biol., 95:175–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emptoz, H., Terrenoire, M. and Tounissoux, D., 1978, Indeter-mination measure for a sequential identification process, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Pattern Recogn.,:262–264Google Scholar
  9. Franquinet, R., Aamiri, A., Gautron, J. and Le Moigne, A., 1988, In vitro proliferation and differentiation of myogenic cells from adult Xenopus, Biol. Struct. Morph., 1:84–88.Google Scholar
  10. Giroud, F., 1982, Cell nucleus pattern analysis; geometric and densitometric featuring, automatic cell phase identification, Biol. Cell., 44:177–188.Google Scholar
  11. Hantai, D., Tassin, A.M., Gautron, J. and Labat-Robert, J., 1985, Biosynthesis of laminin and fibronectin by rat satellite cells during myogenesis in vitro, Cell Biol. Int. Rep., 9:647–654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lipton, B.H., and Schultz, E., 1979, Development Fate of skeletal muscle cells, Science, 205:1292–1294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mauro, A., 1961, Satellite cells of skeletal muscle fibers, J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol., 9:493–495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moss, F.P. and Leblond, C.P., 1971, Satellite cells as a source of nuclei in muscles of growing rates, Anat. Rec., 170:421–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moustafa, Y. and Brugal, G., 1984, Image analysis of cell proliferation and differentiation in the thymus of the newt Pleurodeles waltlii Michah, by SAMBA 200 cell image processing, Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol., 193:139–148.Google Scholar
  16. Pinset, C. and Whalen, R.G., 1985, Induction of myogenic differentiation in serum-free medium does not require DNA synthesis, Dev. Biol., 108:284–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert Le Moigne
    • 1
  • Bernard Lassalle
    • 2
  • Isabelle Martelly
    • 1
  • Jean Gautron
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Recherche sur la Myogénèse et la Régénération Musculaire, UFR de Sciences et TechnologieUniversité Paris-Val de MarneCreteilFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Morphogénèse Animale, UA 685 CNRSUniversité des Sciences et Techniques de LilleVilleneuve d’AscqFrance

Personalised recommendations