New Physics as a Background to Precision Measurements of Standard Model Radiative Corrections

  • C. Verzegnassi
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 233)


With the official opening of the operational stage at LEP 1 on 15 July 1989, 1 period of intensive searches will begin, whose outcome might well be some exciting breakthrough in the key mechanisms that govern the elementary interactions. Thanks to a remarkable joint experimental-theoretical effort, that will be the content of a next-to-appear CERN Yellow report [1], it will be possible to perform a systematic test of a large number of predictions of the Glashow-Salam-Weinberg Standard Model (SM) to the one-loop level of accuracy. If any substantial deviation between experimental and theory were discovered, a first strong support for some kind of New Physics beyond the SM would be thus set by an indirect effect.


Gauge Boson Radiative Correction Standard Model Background Standard Model Contribution Standard Model Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    “Z Physics at LEP”, to appear as CERN Yellow Report, G. Altarelli, R. Kleiss and C. Verzegnassi editors (1989).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    I use several definitions (but not the metric) of B.W. Lynn, M.E. Peskin and R.G. Stuart, CERN Yellow Report “Physics at LEP” CERN 86–02 (1986), J. Ellis and R. Peccei editors, p. 90.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Cvetic and B.W. Lynn, Phys.Rev. D35 (1987) 51.ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    F. Boudjema, V.M. Renard and C. Verzegnassi, Nucl.Phys. B314 (1989) 301.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    B.W. Lynn and C. Verzegnassi, Phys.Rev. D35 (1987) 3326.ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Djouadi, Z.Phys. C39 (1988) 561.ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. London and J.L. Rosner, Phys.Rev. D34 (1986) 1530.ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    U. Amaldi et al., Phys.Rev. D36 (1987) 1385.ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A complete review of the situation is given by Z. Kunszt in these Proceedings.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    See, e.g., P. Berends, These Proceedings.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    F.M. Renard and C. Verzegnassi, Phys.Lett. B225 (1989) 431.ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    See R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Phys.Rev. D23 (1981) 165 for a list of references following the original J. Pati and A. Salam proposal.ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    L.S. Durkin and P. Langacker, Phys.Lett. 166B (1986) 136.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    I use the number quoted by G. Altarelli in the Yellow Report, [2].Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    For a detailed discussion, see R. Casalbuoni, D. Dominici, F. Feruglio and R. Gat to in [1].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Verzegnassi
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Theoretical Physics DivisionCERNGeneva 23Switzerland
  2. 2.Department of Theoretical PhysicsTriesteItaly
  3. 3.INFNSezione di TriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations