Skip to main content

The Large Coefficient Problem: Can We Make Sense Out of QCD Perturbation Theory?

  • Chapter
Radiative Corrections

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSB,volume 233))

  • 113 Accesses

Abstract

There is the possibility of an impending crisis looming on the horizon for QCD. The problem is that in many processes, large coefficients arise in the perturbation series expansion leading to serious uncertainties concerning its predictive power. Until recently most of the examples of such a phenomenon occurred in the calculation of decay rates. These were, by and large, either ignored or dismissed using possible scheme-dependence arguments as a way out. However, more recently a calculation of the 3-loop contribution to the total e + e - annihilation cross-section was performed which gave an enormous coefficient of the order of 50 times that of the 2-loop term(1). If correct, this would imply that the 3-loop contribution actually exceeds that of the 2-loop! Thus, from a conservative viewpoint, the validity of the perturbation series expansion as an estimate for the total e + e - cross-section is called into question. Such a cautionary attitude should even be extended to the lowest order parton-model result, Σ (Q 2i ); (Q i being the charge of the ith quark species). Since this process has played a key role in the development and understanding of QCD and since, in many ways, it is one of the cleanest methods for extracting α 3 (the conventional QCD fine structure constant) the problem can no longer be avoided. Furthermore, there is no reason to doubt (and, in fact, good reasons to believe) that this problem should occur in all physical processes. Coming to grips with it is, of course, not only important for testing QCD but also for extracting fundamental quantities such as α s . Clearly one needs to understand the nature and origin of such large coefficients before one can confidently continue to use perturbative estimates.

1 Talk given at the Radiative Corrections Workshop held at the University of Sussex, Brighton, England, July 1989

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. G. Gorishny, A. L. Kataev and S. A. Larin, Phys. Lett. 212B, 238 (1988)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 85, 631 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 83, 608 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. R. P. Feynman, Solvay Conference 1959

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. M. Stevenson, Phys. Rev. D23, 2916 (1981); C. J. Maxwell,

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. P. M. Stevenson, Phys. Rev. D28, 2037 (1983);

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. J. Brodsky, G. P. Lepage and P. B. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. D28, 228 (1983)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. W. Celmaster and D. Sievers, Phys Rev. D23, 227 (1981)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Dhar, Phys. Lett. 128B, 407 (1983)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Barbieri et al. Nuc. Phys. B154, 535 (1979)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. See, e.g., S. Raby, G. B. West and C. Hoffman, Phys. Rev. 390, 828 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. I. Visotsky, Phys. Lett. 97B, 159 (1980);

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. I. Visotsky, P. Nason, ibid. 175B, 233 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Lee-Franzini, Proc. XXIV Int. Conf. on High Energy Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989) p. 1432

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Fleischer et al., Univ. of Bielefeld preprint BI-TP 05/89

    Google Scholar 

  17. See, e.g., G. B. West, Nuc. Phys. B288, 444 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. G. B. West, Phys. Lett. 145B, 103 (1984)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. G. B. West, Nuc. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 1A, 57 (1987

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. E.T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson, “A Course in Modem Analysis”, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1950)

    Google Scholar 

  21. For a review see J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rep. 70, 109 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

West, G.B. (1990). The Large Coefficient Problem: Can We Make Sense Out of QCD Perturbation Theory?. In: Dombey, N., Boudjema, F. (eds) Radiative Corrections. NATO ASI Series, vol 233. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9054-1_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9054-1_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9056-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9054-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics