Advertisement

Simultaneous Application of Reflection Strength Recorder, Sidescan Sonar and Sub-Bottom Profiler in Seafloor Sediment Mapping

  • K. Winn
  • F. C. Kögler
  • F. Werner
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 5)

Abstract

The results of mapping the seafloor sediment distribution by simultaneous application of the following acoustical methods: measuring reflection intensities from the echosounder returns, sidescan sonar and sub-bottom profiling, supplemented by surface samples and cores, are compared. The reflection intensities are integrated from the echoes of the top 75 cm of sediment. The instrument is very sensitive to slight changes in the composition of muds and clearly defines the boundaries between muddy sediments and sands. However, the reflection intensities do not bring out all the heterogenities of the sediment distribution in sandy areas.

The sidescan sonar records with their higher lateral coverage and resolution in sandy-rocky terrain provide data on the composition, smaller morphological features and areal distribution; clay and mud generally show no returns. Interpreted together with the reflection intensities, the sediment distribution in the area as well as their relations to the physical parameters of the sediments can be deduced. The sub-bottom profiler (Uniboom) has better resolution in harder sediments than the echosounder and furnishes the spatial distribution of the lithological units, permitting further interpretation of provenance, tectonics and the geological causes for this distribution.

Keywords

Reflection Intensity Muddy Sediment Glacial Deposit Sediment Distribution Sidescan Sonar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Faas, R.W., 1969, Analysis of the relationship between acoustic reflectivity and sediment porosity, Geophysics, 34: 546–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hamilton, E.L., 1972, Compressional-wave attenuation in marine sediments, Geophysics, 37: 620–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hinz, K., Kögler, F.C., Seibold, E., 1969, Reflexionsseismische Untersuchungen mit einer pneumatischen Schallquelle und einem Sedimentecholot in der Westlichen Ostsee, Meyniana, 19: 91–102.Google Scholar
  4. Kolp, O., 1965, Paläogeographische Ergebnisse der Kartierung des Meeresgrundes der Westlichen Ostsee zwischen Fehmarn und Arkona, Beiträge zur Meereskunde, 12–14: 19–59.Google Scholar
  5. Seibold, E., Exon, N., Hartmann, M., Kögler, F.C., Krumm, H., Lutze, G.F., Newton, R.S., Werner, F., 1971, Marine geology of Kiel Bay, VIII Int.Sed.Congr., Guidebook: 209–235.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Winn
    • 1
  • F. C. Kögler
    • 1
  • F. Werner
    • 1
  1. 1.Geologisch-Paläontologisches InstitutUniversität KielGermany

Personalised recommendations