Fluctuation Statistics of Sea-Bed Acoustic Backscatter

  • P. A. Crowther
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 5)


A theoretical model is developed that applies to statistics of sea-bed backscatter, including non Rayleigh envelope distribution, finite reverberation envelope auto-correlation at 1ag >1 pulse width, and pulse-pulse envelope correlation. The model is based on a two-phase patch surface assumption, generated by a Markov process, and defined through parameters ρ = high scatter area fraction, γ = high/low backscatter strength ratio, and λ = effective resolution cell 1 patch size ratio. Experiments at 1.8, 4.1 and 8.1 kHz with beamwidth 3.6° to 17° at 5 sites and 3 range bands to minimum grazing angle 2.5° in 70 to 160 m water depth are analysed, indicating non-Rayleigh envelope distributions, power envelope autocorrelations of 0.1 to 0.4 at >1 pulse lag, as expected. Close experimental-model fitting requires ρ = 10-4 to 2.10-2, γ = 3.5 to 80, and a patch dimension of 100 to 400 m. Factorial analysis on model fitting parameters, within experimental sensitivity, indicated beam-width dependence of statistics as predicted; site, grazing angle and site-frequency dependence were all significant at <1% level; simple frequency dependence was not significant.


Pulse Length Fluctuation Statistic Grazing Angle Beam Function Radar Return 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G.V. Trunk, ‘Radar Properties of Non-Rayleigh Sea Clutter’ IEEE Trans Aerosp and Elect. Systs. AES-8, 196(1972), also ibid AES-7, 553(1971).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.R. Boothe, ‘The Weibull Distribution Applied to Ground Clutter Backscatter Coefficient’ U.S. Army Missile Command Report RE-TR-69–15 (June 1969).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.C. Dayley, W.T. Davies and N.R. Mills, ‘Radar Return in High Sea States’ U.S. Naval Research Lab. Rept. NRL-7142 (Sept. 1970).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N.W. Guinard et al ‘NRL Terrain Clutter Study Phase I’ U.S. Naval Research Lab. Rept. NRL 6487 (May 1967).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.M. Findlay, ‘Sea Clutter Measurements by Radar Return Sampling’, U.S. Naval Research Lab. Rept. NRL 6661 (Feb. 1968).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.H. Blythe, D.E. Rice and W.L. Attwood, ‘The CFE Clutter Model with Application to Automatic Detection’ Marconi Review 32, p 185 (1969).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G.V. Trunk and S.F. George, ‘Detection of Targets in Non-Gaussian Sea Clutter’ IEEE Trans. Aerosp. and Elect. Systems AES-6, p 620 (1970).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G.B. Goldstein, ‘False Alarm Regulation in Log-Normal and Weibull Clutter’ IEEE Trans Aerosp. and Elect. Systems AES-9, p 84 (1973).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V.V. Ol’shevskii, ‘Characteristics of Sea Reverberation’, Eng. Trans. publ. Consultant Bureau, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.A. Fisher ‘Statistical Methods for Research Workers’ Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh-London, 1941.Google Scholar
  11. 10a.
    H. Scheffe, ‘The Analysis of Variance’, Wiley, New York (1950).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. A. Crowther
    • 1
  1. 1.Marconi Space and Defence Systems LimitedCamberley, SurreyUK

Personalised recommendations