A New Description of the Process of Identification of Plant-Parasitic Nematode Genera

  • Renaud Fortuner
Part of the Nato ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 7)


Accurate identification is a prerequisite to an understanding of the effect of nematodes as parasites of plants. It is obvious that no significant study on plant pests should be initiated until the identity of the parasite has been accurately established. For example, members of the genus Rotylenchulus in the past have been erroneously classified in the genus Helicotylenchus (H. elisensis, H. parvus), or they were proposed as new genera (Spyrotylenchus, Leiperotylenchus). In the first case, potentially dangerous parasites were wrongly identified as members of a relatively innocuous genus. In the second example, costly studies may have been initiated to define the biology of a supposedly new parasite, whereas the biology of Rotylenchulus is well known.


Compound Microscope Nematode Genus Oesophageal Gland Genital Branch Expert System Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrássy, I., 1976. Evolution as a basis for the systematization of nematodes. London, Pitman Publ. Ltd, 288 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, J.G., 1986. Testing hypotheses of phylogeny of Heteroderidae. In: Lamberti, F. & Taylor, C.E. (Eds). Cyst nematodes. New York & London, Plenum Press: 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baylis, H.A. & Daubney, R., 1926. A synopsis of the families and genera of Nematoda. London, British Museum, Natural History, 277 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Filip’ev, I.N., 1936. On the classification of the Tylenchinae. Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash., 3: 80–82.Google Scholar
  5. Goodey, T., 1933. Plant parasitic nematodes and the diseases they cause, with a foreword by R.T. Leiper. London, E.P. Dutton and Co., 306 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Fortuner, R., 1984. Morphemetrical variability in Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945. 6: Value of the characters used for specific identification. Revue Nématol., 7: 245–264.Google Scholar
  7. Fortuner, R. & Luc, M., 1987. A reappraisal of Tylenchina (Nemata). 6. The family Belonolaimidae Whitehead, 1960. Revue Nématol., 10: 183–202.Google Scholar
  8. Golden, A.M., 1971. Classification of the genera and higher categories of the order Tylenchida (Nematoda). In: Zuckerman, B.M., Mai, W.F. & Rohde, R.A. (Editors), Plant parasitic nematodes. Volume 1. Morphology, anatomy, taxonomy, and ecology. New York, Academic Press, 191–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodey, T. 1963. Soil and freshwater nematodes. London, Methuen and Co., Ltd, 2nd edition revised by J.B. Goodey, 544 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Luc, M., 1986.Hoplorhynchus Andrassy, 1985, a junior synonym ofPratylen- choides Winslow, 1958 (Nemata: Pratylenchidae). Revue Nématol., 9: 198.Google Scholar
  11. Siddiqi, M.R., 1971. Structure of the oesophagus in the classification of the superfamily Tylenchoidea (Nematoda). Indian J. Nematol., 1: 25–43.Google Scholar
  12. Siddiqi, M.R., 1986.Tylenchida: parasites of plants and insects. Slough, United Kingdom, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, ix + 645 p.Google Scholar
  13. Thorne, G., 1949. On the classification of the Tylenchida, new order (Nematoda: Phasmidia). Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash., 16: 37–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renaud Fortuner
    • 1
  1. 1.California Department of Food and AgricultureSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations