Identification of Meloidogynids

  • Jonathan D. Eisenback
Part of the Nato ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 7)


Often two people look at the same nematode specimen at low magnification with a dissecting microscope and see very different pictures. The observer with much experience with a certain group of nematodes sees many details because those features have been examined many times before and frequently at higher magnifications. Whereas, the observer with little experience may not be familiar with certain morphological characters, and therefore he may be unable to ascertain them at low power. The approach to the identification of the meloidogynids in the present chapter is to recognize certain promorphs from characters that can be seen with a dissecting microscope, and to identify nests of species from characters visible with a light microscope. It is hoped that the characters used for the identification of promorphs will be readily visible by observers that are not so familiar with the meloidogynids.


Head Shape Parasitic Female Oral Disc Oesophageal Gland Entire Female 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Choi, Y.E., 1981. Additional information on Meloinema kerongense (Nematoda: Tylenchida). Nematologica, 27: 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Choi, Y.E. & Geraert, E., 1974. Description of Meloinema kerongense n.g., n.sp. (Nematoda: Meloidogynidae) from Korea. Nematologica, 19: 334–341.Google Scholar
  3. Eisenback, J.D., 1982. Morphological comparison of head shape and stylet morphology of second-stage juveniles of Meloidogyne species. J. Nematol., 14: 339–343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Eisenback, J.D., 1985. Techniques for preparing nematodes for scanning electron microscopy. In: K. R. Barker, C. C. Carter, and J. N. Sasser, (Eds), An advanced treatise on Meloidogyne, Vol. II, Methodology. Cooperative Publication of the Department of Plant Pathology and United States Agency for International Development, Raleigh, North Carolina: 79–105.Google Scholar
  5. Eisenback, J.D. & Hirschmann, H., 1981. Identification of Meloidogyne species on the basis of head shape and stylet morphology of the male. J. Nematol., 13: 513–521.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eisenback, J.D. & Hirschmann, H., 1982. Morphological comparison of stylets of male root-knot nematodes(Meloidogyne spp.). Scanning Electron Microscopy, 3: 837–843.Google Scholar
  7. Eisenback, J.D., Hirschmann, H. & Triantaphyllou, A.C., 1980. Morphological comparisons of Meloidogyne female head structures, perineal patterns, and stylets. J. Nematol., 12: 300–313.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Golden, A.M. & Jensen, H.J., 1974. Nacobbodera chitwoodi, n. gen., n. sp. (Nacobbidae: Nematoda) on Douglas fir in Oregon. J. Nematol., 6: 30–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ivanova, T. & Krall, E., 1985. [Nematodes of the family Meloidoderidae (Nematoda, Hoplolaimidea). 1. A new genusBursadera gen. n. and phylogenetic relationships in some families of Hoplolaimoidea.] Eesti NSV Tead. Akad. Toim., 34: 135–143 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  10. Jepson, S.B., 1987. Identification of the root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne species). Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, 265 p.Google Scholar
  11. Taylor, A.L., 1987. Identification and estimation of root-knot nematode species in mixed populations. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, Bulletin 12, 73pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan D. Eisenback
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology and Weed ScienceVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations