ELF and VLF Signal Properties: Physical Characteristics

  • H. L. König


In connection with the study of the biological effects of ELF (extremely low frequency, frequency range approximately 1 Hz ....1 kHz) and VLF (very low frequency, frequency range approximately 1 kHz .... 100 kHz) electromagnetic fields, it is of interest to know more details concerning the existence and physical nature of these fields.


Signal Property Lightning Discharge Field Fluctuation Attenuation Rate Schumann Resonance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ALPERT, Ya. L. and FLIGEL, D.S., Vvopagation of ELF and VLF Waves Near the Earthy Translation edited by J.R. Wait, Boulder, Col; Consultants Bureau, New York — London, 1970.Google Scholar
  2. BALSER, M. and WAGNER, C.A., Observation of Earth-Iono-sphere Cavity Resonances, Nature, 188, (4751), 1960.Google Scholar
  3. BELYANSKIL, V.B. and MIKHAILOVA, G.A., Investigations of the pvoiperties of Aevonomiya, 1 (3), 1961.Google Scholar
  4. CHAPMAN, F.W. and JONES, D.L., Earth-Ionosphere Cavity Resonances and the Propagation of Extremely Low-Frequency Radio Waves, Nature, 202: 654, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CHAPMAN, F.W. and MACARIO, R.C., Propagation of audio-frequency radio waves to great distances, Naturej, 177: 930, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CHAPMAN, F.W. and MATTHEWS, W.D., Audio-frequency spectrum of atmospherics. Nature, 172: 495, 1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CLAYTON, M., POLK, C., and ETZOLD, H., Absolute Calibration of Antennas at Extremely Low Frequencies, IEEE Trans, on Antennas and Propagation, 1973; (Also:Univ. of Rhode Island Report 4041/1, 1972).Google Scholar
  8. CROMBIE, D.D., Difference between the E-W and W-E Propagation of VLF signals over long distances, J, Atmospheric Terrest. Phys., 12: 110, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CROMBIE, D.D., Non reciprocity of propagations of VLF radio waves along the magnetic equator. Proc. IRE, 51 (4), 1963.Google Scholar
  10. GALEJS, J., ELF Propagation-Review Paper, Section I in: Eleotromagnetios of the Sea, AGARD Conference Proceedings, no. 77 (Conference held in Paris, June 22 – 25, 1970); AGARD-CP-77–70, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Technical Information Service Document AD 716 305.Google Scholar
  11. GALEJS, J., Terrestrial Propagation of Long Eleotromagnetiö Waves, Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York, Toronto, 1972.Google Scholar
  12. GARLAND, G.D., Methods and Techniques in Geophysics, (p. 277, Earth Currents), Interscience Publishers, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
  13. HANSELMAN, J.C., CASSELMAN, C.J., TIBBAIS, M.L. and BICKEL, J.E., Field intensity measurement at 10.2 kc/s over reciprocal paths, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Std., 68D (1), 1964Google Scholar
  14. HEPBURN, F., Atmospherics with very low-frequency components below 1 kc/s, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys., 10: 266, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. HEPBURN, F. and PIERCE, E., Atmospherics with very low- frequency components. Nature, 171: 837, 1953; Phil. Mag., 45: 917, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. HOLZER, DEAL and RUTTENBERG, Low Audio Frequency Natural Electromagnetic Signals,Symposium on the Propagation of VLF Waves, Boulder, Col., Paper 45, Jan. 1957.Google Scholar
  17. HOPKINS, G.H. and SMITH, H.W., An Investigation of the Magnetotellupic Method for Determining Subsurface Resistivities, Report No. 140, Electrical Engin. Research Laboratory, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 1966.Google Scholar
  18. HUGHES, H.G., A comparison at extremely low frequencies of positive and negative atmospherics, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys., 29: 1277, 1967a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. HUGHES, H.G., The directional dependency of slow-tail ELF Atmospheric wave-forms, J, Atmospheric Terrest, Phys., 29: 1629, 1967b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ISHIDA, T., Statistical Characteristics of Atmospheric Noise, 16th General Assembly of URSI, Ottawa, 1969.Google Scholar
  21. KEEFE, T.J., ETZOLD, H. and POLK, C., Detection and Processing of ELF (3–30 Ez) Natural Electromagnetic Noise, Report AFCRL-RT-73–0077, Univ. of Rhode Island, Kingston, R.I., 1973.Google Scholar
  22. KIMPARA, A., The waveform of atmospherics in the daytime and night, Proc. Res. Inst. Atmosphere Nagoya Univ., 4 (1), 1956.Google Scholar
  23. KÖNIG, H., Zur Frage der biotropen Wirkung atmosphärischer Störungen, Med. Meteorolog., Heft 26, 1954; Ein Impulsempfänger für atmosphärische Langwellenstrahlung, Med. Meteorolog., 10, 10, 1955, und 157, 1958; Z.Angew. Bader und Klimaheilkd. 9, 477, 1962.Google Scholar
  24. KONIG, H.L., Atmospherics of Minimal Frequencies, (in German), Zeitschr. f. Angew. Physik, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 264–274, 1959, translated in English by the American Meteorological Society, 45 Beacon Street, Boston, Mass., under Contract AF 19 (638) -3880, AFCRL, L.G. Hanscom Field, Bedford, Mass. USA (Aug. 1964); further Ultra-Low-Frequency Atmospherics, 1960 IRE International Convention Record, New York, N.Y., Part 1, 128–133, March 21–24, 1960.Google Scholar
  25. KÖNIG, H.L., FINKLE, H., and POLK, C., Measurement of Electric Fields between 3 cps and 10,000 cps with a Vertical Antenna over the Atlantic Ocean Near the Coast of Florida, Dept. of Eleotvioal Engin., Univ. of Rhode Island, Kingston, R.I., Report 396 (10)/1., Dec. 1964.Google Scholar
  26. LIEBERMANN, L., Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic waves, II: Propagation properties, J. Appl. Phys., 27: 1477, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. LOKKEN, J.E., Instrumentation for Receiving Electromagnetic Noise below 3000 cps. In: D.F. Bleib (Ed.) Natural electromagnetic phenomena helow 30 kc/s. New York: Plenum Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  28. MARTIN, H.G., Waveguide propagation of VLF radio waves, J. Atmospheric Terrest. Phys., 20: 206, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MIKHAILOVA, G.A., On the spectra of atmospherics and phase velocity of electromagnetic waves at very low frequencies, Geomagnetizm i Aeronomiya, 2: 257, 1962.Google Scholar
  30. OEHRL, W. und KÖNIG, H.L., Messung und Deutung elektromagnetischer Oszillationen natürlichen Ursprungs im Frequenzbereich unter 1 Hz, Z. f. Angew. Physik, 25, I.H., S. 6–14, 1968.Google Scholar
  31. POLK, C., Relation of ELF Noise and Schumann Resonances to Thunderstorm Activity, In:Planetary Electrodynamics, vol. 2, pp. 55–83 (Coroniti and Hughes, editors), Gordon and Breach, New York, London, 1969.Google Scholar
  32. POLK, C., Source, Propagation, Amplitude and Temporal Variation of Extremely Low Frequency (0–100 Hz) Electromagnetic Fields, Symposium and Workshop on the Effects of Low-Frequency Magnetic and Electric Fields on Biological Communication Processes, Aspen, Colorado, Febr. 18–24, 1973.Google Scholar
  33. RHOADS, F.J. and GARNER, W.E., An investigation of the modal interference of VLF radio waves. Radio Sci., 2: 539, 1967.Google Scholar
  34. RYCROFT, M.J., Resonances of the Earth-Ionosphere Cavity Observed at Cambridge, England, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Std., 69D (8), 1965.Google Scholar
  35. SCHULZE, R., Strahlenklima dev Erde, Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt, 1970.Google Scholar
  36. SCHUMANN, W.O., On the Characteristic Oscillations of a Conducting Sphere which is surrounded by an Air Layer and an Ionospheric Shell, (in German), Z. Naturforschung, vol. 7a, P. 149–154, 1952.Google Scholar
  37. SCHUMANN, W.O., und KÖNIG, H., Atmospherics geringster Frequenzen,Naturwissenschaften, 41, 183, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. SODERBERG, E.F. and FINKLE, M., A Comparison of ELF Atmospherics Noise Spectra Measured Above and in the Sea, Navy Underwater Sound Laboratory, New London, Connecticut, USA, 1970.Google Scholar
  39. STOREY, L.R., An Investigation of Wistling Atmospherics, Fhil. Trans. Roy, Soc. Lond., Ser. A246, Nr. 905, 1953.Google Scholar
  40. TAYLOR, W.L., Daytime Attenuation Rates in the VLF Band Using Atmospherics, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Std., 64D: 349, 1960a.Google Scholar
  41. TAYLOR, W.L., VLF Attenuation for East-west and West-East Daytime Propagation Using Atmospherics, J. Geophys. Res., 65 (7), 1960b.Google Scholar
  42. TEPLEY, L., A comparison of spherics as observed in the VLF and ELF bands, J. Geophys. Res., 64: 2315, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. TRAN, A. and POLK, C., Propagation and Resonance Parameters of the Earth-Ionosphere Cavity—Spherical Versus Planar Stratification of the Ionosphere, Report AFCRL-72–0682, Dept. of Electrical Eng., Univ. of Rhode Island, Nov. 1972.Google Scholar
  44. WAIT, J.R., Terrestrial Propagation of Very-Low Frequency Radio Waves, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., vol. 64D, 1960.Google Scholar
  45. WATT, A.D. and GROGHAN, R.D., Comparison of observed VLF attenuation rates and excitation factors with theory, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Std., 68D (1), 1964.Google Scholar
  46. WATT, A.D. and MAXWELL, E.L., Characteristic of Atmospheric Noise from 1 to 100 kc/s. Symposium on the Propagation of VLF Waves, Boulder, Col., Paper 35, Jan. 1957.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. L. König
    • 1
  1. 1.Electro-Physics InstituteTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations