Advertisement

The Visibility of rms Slope Variations on the sea Surface

  • R. D. Chapman

Abstract

A model relating viewing geometry, sky conditions, and statistical sea surface parameters is presented. The model is used to estimate the relative visibility of surface perturbations manifested by a variation in the rms surface slope. These estimates are presented for a variety of geometries in the solar plane assuming a clear sky and two different wind speeds (~ 2 and 7 m/s). The results of this analysis, applicable to a unidirectional radiometer with no temporal averaging, show the visibility of surface perturbations to be maximized by geometries with large gradients in the slope-to-luminance transfer function (within the glitter pattern or near the horizon). Detectability of these perturbations, as measured by the luminance SNR sensitivity to rms surface slope variations, is maximized by either large gradients, as for the visibility, or very small gradients in the slope-to-luminance transfer functions (90° away from the glitter pattern). It is shown that improvements in the estimated detectability can be obtained through spatial and temporal averaging. Two methods for quantitatively estimating these improvements are presented.

Keywords

Transfer Function Internal Wave Contrast Sensitivity Wind Wave Solar Zenith Angle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apel, J. R., H. M. Byrne, J. R. Proni, and R. L. Charnell (1975a): Observations of oceanic internal and surface waves from the Earth Resources Technology Satellite. J. Geophys. Res. 80, 865–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apel, J. R., J. R. Proni, H. M. Byrne, and R. L. Sellers (1975b): Near-simultaneous observations of intermittent internal waves on the continental shelf from ship and spacecraft. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2, 128–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapman, R. D. (1981): Visibility of rms slope variations on the sea surface. Appl. Optics 20, 1959–1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapman, R. D., and G. B. Irani (1981): Errors in estimating slope spectra from wave images. Appl. Optics 20, pp. 3645–3652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hughes, B. A. (1978): The effect of internal waves on surface wind waves. 2. Theoretical analysis. J. Geophys. Res. 83, 455–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hughes, B. A., and H. L. Grant (1978): The effect of internal waves on surface wind waves. 1. Experimental measurements. J.Geophys. Res. 83, 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. LaFond, E. C. (1962): Internal waves, in: The Sea, Vol. 1 (M. N. Hill, ed.), Wiley, New York, 745–747.Google Scholar
  8. Maul, G. A., D. R. Norris, and W. R. Johnson (1974): Satellite photography of eddies in the Gulf loop current. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1, 256–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Shand, J. A. (1953): Internal waves in Georgia Strait. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 34, 849–856.Google Scholar
  10. Strong, A. E., and R. J. DeRycke (1973): Ocean current monitoring employing a new satellite sensing technique. Science, 182, 482–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Watson, G. N. (1933): Notes on generating functions of polynomials. 2. Hermite polynomials. J. London Math. Soc. 8, 194–199.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. D. Chapman
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Physics LaboratoryThe Johns Hopkins UniversityLaurelUSA

Personalised recommendations