Advertisement

The Differences in Receptor Cross Reactivity and Clonal Structure Between Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes, Specific Suppressor T Cells and Memory T Cells Immune to Antigens of the H-2 Complex

  • B. D. Brondz
  • I. F. Abronina
  • Z. K. Blandova
  • A. V. Karaulov
  • A. A. Pimenov
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 146)

Abstract

Study of the T lymphocyte clonal structure is complicated by striking inhomogeneity of T cells responding to the same antigen. T cells are shown to perform various functions; killer, suppressor, helper, delayed hypersensitivity reactions. The relevant T cell subsets appear not to be identical as to the structure of their antigen-binding receptors (l). Moreover, effector T cell receptor contact with an antigen, in addition to providing antigenic recognition, simultaneously promotes triggering of the specific T cell function, particularly the killer activity of cytotoxic T lymiphocytes (CTL)(2,3). As other T cell subsets responding to the same H-2 antigen are unable to lyse target cells (TC), it remains unclear in what way the specific T cell function is due to peculiarities of the determinant recognizable by the relevant receptors. In other words, what is the property of the determinant, recognition of which leads to activation of the CTL function.

Keywords

Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction Delay Hypersensitivity Reaction Clonal Structure Inhibition Index Cytotoxic Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brondz, B.D., and O.V. Rochlin. Molecular and Cellular Bases of Immunological Recognition (Russian). Nauka, Moscow (1978).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parker, W.L., and E. Martz. Lectin-induced non-lethal adhesion between cytolytic T Ijrmphocytes and antigenically unrecognizable tumor cells and nonspecific “triggering” of cytolysis. J. Immunol. 124:25 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wei, W.Z., and R.R. Lindgnist. Alloimmune cytolytic T-lympho- cyte activity: triggering and expression of killing mechanisms in cytolytic lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 126:513 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brondz, B.D, and A.E. Snegirova. Interaction of immune Ijrmpho- cytes with the mixture of target cells possessing selected specificities of the H-2 immunizing allele. Immunology 20:457 (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Golstein, P., E.A. Svedmyr, and H. Wigzell. Cell mediating specific in vitro cytotoxicity. I. Detection of receptor- bearing lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 134:1385 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forman, J., and G. Moller. Generation of cytotoxic Ijmiphocytes in mixed lymiphocyte reaction. II. Importance of private and public H-2 alloantigens on the expression of cytotoxicity. Immunogenetics 3:211 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brondz, B.D., I.K. Egorov, and G.I. Drizlikh. Private H-2 specificities as possible selective target for cell-mediated immunity. J. Exp. Med. 141:11 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Forman, J., and J. Klein. Analysis of H-2 mutants. Evidence for multiple CMC target specificities controlled by the H-2Kb gene. Immunogenetics 1:469 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Melief, C.J.M., deWaal, L.P., van der Meulen, Melvold, R.W., and H.I. Kohn. Fine specificity of alioimmune cytotoxic T lymphocytes directed against H-2K. A study with Kb mutants. J. Exp. Med. 151:993 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vazquez, A.A., Senyk, Fridman, W.H., and C. Neauport-Sautes. Public H-2 specificities are target determinants for allo- reactive cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. J. Immunogen. 7:107 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andreev, A.V., Drizlikh, G.I., and B.D. Brondz. Interction of anti-Kb and anti-Dd effector lymphocytes with target cells of mutant haplotypes. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. (Russian) 8: 710 (1976).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Geib, R., Ching, C., and J. Klein. Evidence for multiple clones of cytotoxic T cells responding to antigenic determinants on the same molecule. J. Immunol. 120:340 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vazquez, A., Neauport-Sautes, C., and A. Senik. Separate cyto-T-lymphocyte subsets recognize the different H-2 specificities. J. Exp. Med. 151:776 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brondz, B.D., Karaulov, A.V., Abronina, I.F., and Z.K. Blandova. Biological immunological and genetic characterization of specific suppressor T cells and their receptors immune to antigens of the H-2 complex. Clonal structure, narrow specificity of receptor and genetic restriction by specific T-suppressor function. Molec. Immunol. 17:833 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fujimoto, S., Matsuzawa, T., Nakagawa, K., and I. Tada. Cellular interaction between cytotoxic and suppressor T cells against sjmgeneic tumor in the mouse. Cell. Immunol. 38:378 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Greene, M.I., and L.L. Perry. Population of the immune response to tumor antigens. IV. Differential specificities of suppressor T cells or their products and effector T cells. J. Immunol. 121:63 (1978).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mulbacher, A., and R.V. Blanden. Cross-reactivity patterns of murine cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Cell. Immunol. 43:70 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brondz, B.D., Egorova, S.G., and I.E. Kotomina. Enrichment of effector T lymphocytes specific to H-2 antigens by elution from allogeneic target cells and characterization of the eluted lymphocyte population. Eur. J. Immunol. 5:734 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Drizlikh, G.I., Andreev, A.V., Kotomina, I.F., and B.D. Brondz. Quantitative estimation of cytotoxic activity of immune lymphocytes using 51Cr-labeled peritoneal macrophages as target cells. J. Immunol. Meth. 8:383 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brondz, B.D., Karaulov, A.V., Abronina, I.F., and Z.K. Blandova. Requirements for induction of specific suppressor T cells and detection of their H-2 antigen-binding receptors by fractionation on target cell monolayers. Scand. J. Immunol. 13:517 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rollinghoff, M., and H. Wagner. Secondary cytotoxic allograft response in vitro. I. Antigenic requirements. Eur. J. Immunol. 5:875 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brondz, B.D., Andreev, A.V., Egorova, S.G., and G.I. Drizlikh. Cross reaction of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-binding receptors immune to antigens of the H-2 system. Scand. J. Immunol. 10:195 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Julius, M.H., Simpson, E., and L.A. Herzenberg. A rapid method for the isolation of functional thymus-derived murine lyaaphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 3:645 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brondz, B.D., Pimenov, A.A., Blandova, Z.K., and G.N. Vornakova. study on the nature of cross reactivity of cytotoxic T lymphocyte receptors immune to the antigens of the H-2 cosaplex by their fractionation on target-cell monolayers. Molec. Biol. (Russian) 16:000 (1982).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Einberg, R., Burakoff, S.J., Cantor, H., and B. Benacerraf. Biological significance of alloreactivity: T cells stimulated by Sendai virus-coated syngeneic cells specifically lyse alio- geneic target cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75:5145 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Levy, R.B., Gilheany, P.E., and G.M. Shearer. Role of self and foreign antigeneic determinants in allogeneic and self- restricted cytotoxic T cell recognition. J. Exp. Med. 152: 405 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Teh, H.S., Phillips, R.A., and R.G. Miller. Quantitative studies on the precursors of cytotoxic lymphocytes. IV. Specificity and cross reactivity of cytotoxic clones. J. Immunol. 120:425 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Komatsu, Y., Nawa, Y., Ballamy, A.K., and J. Marbrook. Clones of cytotoxic Ijrmphocytes can recognize uninfected cells in a primary response against influenza virus. Nature 274:802 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nagy, Z.A., and B.E. Elliott. The receptor specificity of alloreactive T cells. Distinction between stimulator K I and D region products and degeneracy of third-party H-2 recognition by low-affinity T cells. J. Exp. Med. 150:1520 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sherman, L.A. Dissection of the B10.D2 anti-H-2Kb cytolytic T lymphocyte receptor repertoire. J. Exp. Med. 151:1386 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Orosz, E.G., and F.H. Bach. Alioantigen-activated CML suppression independent of cytotoxic activity. J. Immunol. 123: 1419 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brondz, B.D., Karaulov, A.V., Chervonsky, A.V., and Z.K. Blandova. Requirement of the localization of both appropriate and irrelevant H-2 antigens on the same stimulator cell for un- specific DNA synthesis inhibition caused by the H-2 antigen- primed specific suppressor T cells. Immunogenetics 14:000 (1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. D. Brondz
    • 1
  • I. F. Abronina
    • 1
  • Z. K. Blandova
    • 1
  • A. V. Karaulov
    • 1
  • A. A. Pimenov
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Tumour Immunochemistry and DiagnosisCancer Research CentreMoscowUSSR

Personalised recommendations