Axial Currents and Pionic Modes in Nuclei

  • Mannque Rho
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSB, volume 45)


In this lecture, I discuss how one can correlate and unify several aspects of medium-energy nuclear physics and learn about the mesonic and other degrees of freedom in nuclear structure. One of the main objectives of meson factories is precisely to probe such degrees of freedom and I shall show how this objective can actually be achieved.


Axial Current Vector Charge Tensor Force Axial Charge Pion Exchange 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    See Mesons in Nuclei, ed. by M. Rho and D.H. Wilkinson (North-Holland Publishing Co., in press).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.O. Riska and G.E. Brown, Phys. Lett. 38B, 193 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Hockert, D.O. Riska, M. Gari and A. Huffman, Nucl. Phys. A217, 14 (1973)ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. G.G. Simon et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 739 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    H. Ohtsubo, J. Fujita and G. Takeda, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44, 1596 (1970)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Rho, unpublished; K. Ohta, to be published. I. follow Ohta’s notation.Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    K. Kubodera, J. Delorme and M. Rho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 755 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 6.
    P.A.M. Guichon, M. Giffon and C. Samour, Phys. Lett. 74B, 15 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. There is a rather strong indication that the second-class form factor is negligibly small (see Ref. 8). Here we retain it for the sake of completeness.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    K. Sugimoto, T. Minamisono, Y. Nojiri and Y. Masuda, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  11. K. Sugimoto, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Structure, Tokyo, Japan, 1977 (International Academic Printing Co. Ltd., Tokyo, 1977)Google Scholar
  12. P. Lebrun, Ph. Deschepper, L. Grenacs, J. Lehmann, C. Leroy, L. Palffy, A. Possoz and A. Maio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 302 (1978)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. H. Brandle, L. Grenacs, J. Lang, L.Ph. Roesch, V.L. Talegdi, P. Truttmann, A. Weis and Z. Zehnder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 306 (1978)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. H. Brandle, G. Miklos, L.Ph. Roesch, V.L. Telegdi, P. Truttmann, A. Zehnder, L. Grenacs, P. Lebrun and J. Lehmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 299 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 9.
    A.M. Green and T.H. Shucan, Nucl. Phys. A188, 289 (1972)ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Ichimura, H. Hyuga and G.E. Brown, Nucl. Phys. A196, 17 (1972)ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Rho, Erice Summer School Lectures, 1976.Google Scholar
  18. 10.
    G.E. Brown, NORDITA Lectures, 1978.Google Scholar
  19. 11.
    See ref. 9 and G.E. Brown, private communication.Google Scholar
  20. 12.
    E. Oset and W. Weise, Phys. Lett. 77B, 159 (1978) and to be published. I follow closely this paper.ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 13.
    G. Hohler and E. Pietarinen, B95, 210 (1975).Google Scholar
  22. 14.
    E. Oset and M. Rho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 47 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 15.
    A. Arima and H. Hyuga, in Mesons In Nuclei, ed. by M. Rho and D.H. Wilkinson (North-Holland Publishing Co., in press).Google Scholar
  24. 16.
    G.E. Brown, S.-O. Backman, E. Oset and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A286, 191 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 17.
    G. Bajon, Les Houches Summer School Lectures, 1977Google Scholar
  26. G. Baym and D. Campbell, Mesons in Nuclei, ed. by M. Rho and D.H. Wilkinson (North-Holland Publishing Co., in press).Google Scholar
  27. 18.
    The close connection between g’ operative in the quenching of Gamow-Teller m.e. ‘s and the generalized Lorentz-Lorenz was first pointed out inGoogle Scholar
  28. M. Ericson, A. Figureau and C. Thevenet, Phys. Lett. 45B, 19 (1973), and phrased in the form presented here by myself in Nucl. Phys. A231, 493 (1974). That the g’ effect accounts indeed largely for the observed trends in light nuclei was re-emphasized in my Erice lectures, ref. 9. I believe that the recent calculations by Oset and myself confirm this assertion. See also F. Khanna and I. Towner in this proceeding, and also Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 51 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 19.
    A.B. Migdal, Rev. of Mod. Phys. 50, 107 (1978). It is easy to find an example where g’ and can differ. Consider a scalar meson-exchange potential. In direct particle-hole channel, it contributes nothing to g’ and g’. But_in the exchange term, it can contribute to g’ but not to g’.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 20.
    J. Meyer-ter-Vehn, contribution to the Symposium on Relativist ic Heavy-Ion Research, GSI Darmstadt, March 7–10, 1978.Google Scholar
  31. P. Bonche, H. Pirner, M. Rho and K. Yazaki, to be published.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mannque Rho
    • 1
  1. 1.Orme des MerisiersDPhT — CEN SaclayGif-sur-YvetteFrance

Personalised recommendations