Advertisement

Biological Views of Adaptation — Some Historical Accounts

  • F. Eugene Yates
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 16)

Abstract

Simple, inanimate systems can give a false impression of adaptability and intentionality. For example, consider a candle flame in the bottom of a tall, cylindrical chimney, but without a port for air at the bottom. It will “seek to stay alive” by leaning steadily to one side, as a baffle is lowered down the center of the chimney. By so doing the flame spontaneously (and to us cleverly) organizes the airflow into a downdraft of fresh air, and an updraft of exhaust. It seems to adapt its behavior to its circumstances, in order to persist. Failing to do this, it would gutter and die. This “adaptation” invokes the illusion of intentionality, but it gains us little, and risks unnecessary confusions, to apply the terms “adaptation” and “intention” to the candle in this circumstance. These terms should be reserved for truly complex system behavior (see the discussion of intentionality by 0. Selfridge, in this volume).

Keywords

General System Theory Anal Papilla Biological View Lamarckian Inheritance Candle Flame 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashby, W. R., 1963, “An Introduction to Cybernetics,” Wiley (Science editions). New York.Google Scholar
  2. Berlinski, D., 1976, “On Systems Analysis: An Essay Concerning the Limitations of Some Mathematical Methods in the Social, Political, and Biological Sciences,” MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  3. Bernard, C., 1878. “Lecons sur les Phenomenes de la Vie, Communsaux Animaux et aux Vegetaux,” Balliere, Paris.Google Scholar
  4. Bertalanffy, L. von, 1968, “Generali System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications,” Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Cannon, W. B., 1929, Organization for physiological homeostasis. Physiological Reviws, 9: 397–429.Google Scholar
  6. Darwin, C., 1902, “Origin of Species,” (Sixth edition) American Home Library Company, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Dobzhansky, T., Ayala, F. J., Stebbins, G. L., and Valentine, J. W., 1977, “Evolution,” W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  8. Gould, S. J., 1977, “Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History,” W. W. Norton and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Henderson, L. J., 1913, “The Fitness of the Environment: An Inquiry Into the Biological Significance of the Properties of Matter,” (Beacon paperback, 1958) Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  10. Neumann, J. von, 1966, Theory of self-reproducing automata. Part 1, Fourth Lecture: “The Role of High and of Extremely High Complication,” edited and completed by A. W. Burks, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 64–73.Google Scholar
  11. Sechenov, I., 1952, 1956, “Selected Physiological and Psychological Works,” (edited by K. Koshtoyants: translated from Russian by S. Belsky) Foreign Languages Publshing House, Moscow.Google Scholar
  12. Thompson, D’Arcy, 1961, “On Growth and Form,” (Abridged edition edited by J. T. Bonner) Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  13. Waddington, C. H., 1960, “The Ethical Animal,” Midway Reprint (1975), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Eugene Yates
    • 1
  1. 1.Crump Institute for Medical EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations