Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO Conference Series ((SYSC,volume 16))

  • 322 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of “ill-defined system” collapses into triviality if it is used to refer to any system that has not yet been well defined. One might take it rather to mean one that can never be understood in a well-defined way. This interpretation, however, invites troublesome disputes over what is to count as “well-defined”, and also prejudges the question of whether human knowledge will ever be adequate to the system concerned. For instance, Schrodinger’s wave-equations are mathematically well-defined, but they concern quantum phenomena which many would regard as a paradigm case of ill-definedness; and though the Copenhagen School believed this ill-definedness to be grounded at the ontological level, Einstein cited his conviction that “God does not play at dice” in interpreting quantum indeterminacy as a merely epistemological matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arbib, M., 1969, Self-Producing Automata — Some implications for Theoretical Biology, in “Towards a Theoretical Biology, Vol. 2,” C. H. Waddington, ed., Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A., 1972, “Purposive Explanation in Psychology,” Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A., 1977, “Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man,” chap, xiv., Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A., 1981, “Minds and Mechanisms: Philosophical Psychology and Computational Models”, in “The Case for a Cognitive Biology,” chap. 4, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A., 1982, “Is Equilibration Important?,” Brit. J. Psychol., 73: 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, F. K., and Ritchie, G. D., 1981, “AM: A Case Study in A. I. Methodology,” Dept Computer Science Memo, University Kent at Canterbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. 1959, Adaptation-Level Theory, in “Psychology, A Study of a Science, Vol I: Sensory, Perceptual, and Physiological Formulations, S. Koch,” ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B., and Karmiloff-Smith, A., 1975, If You Want to Get Ahead, Get a Theory, Cognition, 3:195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A., 1979, Micro- and Macro-Developmental Changes in Language Acquisition and Other Representational Systems, Cognitive Science, 3:81–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S., “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” University Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. B., 1977, Automated Theory Formation in Mathematics, Proc. Fifth Int. Joint Conf. Art. Int., Cambridge, Mass., 833–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. B., 1980,“The Heuristics of Nature: The Plausible Mutation of DNA,” Stanford University Computer Science Dept., Report HPP-80–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R. B., 1921, The Independent Variability of Purpose and Belief, J. Philos., 18:169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rissland, E., 1978, Understanding Understanding Mathematics, Cognitive Science, 2:361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, C., 1978, “Schoenberg,” Fontana, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, A. L., 1970, Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers, II:- Recent Progress, in “Human and Artificial Intelligence,” F. J. Crosson, ed., Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 81–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selfridge, O. G., in press. Track and Trail in Adaptation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, G. J., 1975, “A Computer Model of Skill Acquisition,” American Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C., 1971, Interpretation and the Sciences of Man, Rev. Metaphysics, 25:3–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, R., 1962, “Language in the Crib,” Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. W., 1959, Motivation Reconsidered: The Concept of Competence, Psychol. Rev., 66:297–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, P. H., 1975, Learning Structural Descriptions from Examples, in “The Psychology of Computer Vision,” P. H. Winston, ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boden, M.A. (1984). Failure is Not the Spur. In: Selfridge, O.G., Rissland, E.L., Arbib, M.A. (eds) Adaptive Control of Ill-Defined Systems. NATO Conference Series, vol 16. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8941-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8941-5_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8943-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8941-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics