Skip to main content

Richly Specified Input to Language Learning

  • Chapter
Adaptive Control of Ill-Defined Systems

Part of the book series: NATO Conference Series ((SYSC,volume 16))

Abstract

Language is learned, in the course of the everyday events of the first five years of life by children bright and dull, eager or sullen, pampered or abused, exposed to Urdu or to English. This universal learning despite varying environments poses a problem to general inductive theories of language learning. This is largely because the rich input data would seem to allow the learner to form a bewildering number of generalizations, many of them absurd. Along with some others, we argue that the child has specific dispositions about how to organize and represent linguistic stimulation, and that it is these representational biases that rescue his inductions from potentially unlimited pitfalls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bellugi, U. The acquisition of negation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard University, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, D. Dynamics of a Creole system. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L. One word at a time. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L., Language. New York: Holt, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D. C., Computational distinctions of vocabulary type. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D. C., Garrett, M. F., and Zurif, E. G., Syntactic deficits in Broca’s aphasia. In D. Caplan, ed., Biological studies of mental processes. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. and Hanlon, C. Derivational complexity and the order of acquisition in child speech. In J. R. Hayes, ed., Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. Semantic development. In E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman, eds., Language acquisition: State of the art. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E., The young word maker. In E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman, eds., Language Acquisition: State of the art. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtiss, S. Genie: A psycholinguistic study of a modem-day “Wild Child. New York: Academic Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorian, N. D., The fate of morphological complexity in language death. Language, 4(3), 1978, 590–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimas, P. Siqueland, E. Jusczyk, P., and Vigorito, J. Speech perception in infants. Science 171, 1971, 303–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ervin, S. Imitation and structural change in children’s language. In E. Lenneberg, ed., New Directions in the study öf language, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, W. The influence of syntactical structure on learning. American Journal of Psychology, 74, 1961, 80–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, H., Goldin-Meadow, S., and Gleitman, L. Beyond Herodotus: The creation of language by linguistically deprived deaf children, in A. Lock, ed., Action, Symbol, and Gesture; The Emergence of Language, New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furrow, D., Nelson, K., and Benedict, H. Mothers’ speech to children and syntactic development: Some simple relationships. Journal of Child Language, 6, 1979, 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F., The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Bower, ed., The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 9, New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanzer, M. Grammatical category: A rote learning and word association analysis. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 1, 1962, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, H. and Gleitman, L. R., Language use and language judgment. In C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, & W. S-Y. Wang, eds., Individual differences in language ability and language behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L. R. and Gleitman, H. Phrase and paraphrase. New York: Norton, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L. R., Gleitman, H., and Shipley, E. F., The emergence of the child as grammarian. Cognition, 10, 1972, 137–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L. R., Newport, E.L., and Gleitman, H., The current status of the Motherese hypothesis (in press. Journal of Child Language)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L. R. and Rozin, P., The structure and acquisition of reading I: Relations between orthographies and the structure of language, in A. Reber & D. Scarborough, eds., Toward a psychology of reading, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L. R. and Wanner, E., Language acquisition: state of the state of the art, in E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman, eds., Language acquisition: State of the art. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, E. M. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10, 1967, 447–474.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jusczyk, P. W., Auditory versus phonetic coding of speech signals during infancy. Proceedings of the CNRS Conference, 1980, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kean, M. L. Agrammatism: A phonological deficit?. Cognition7(1), 1979, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, D. H. Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal of phonetics, 3, 1975, 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, P. K. and Miller, J. D., Speech perception by the chinchilla. Voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants. Science, 190, 1975, 69–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, B. and Gleitman, L. R., Language learning and the vocabulary of perception in congenitally blind babies (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, L. and Joshi, A., Skeletal structural descriptions. Information and Control, 39(2), 1978, 192–211.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. Developmental psycholinguistics. In F. Smith & G. A. Miller, eds., The genesis of language; a psycholinguistic approach, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maratsos, M., The child’s construction of grammatical categories. In. E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman, eds., Language acquisition; State of the art. New York; Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. and Newport, E. L., The role of constituent structure in the induction of an artificial language. Journal of Verbal Learning and verbal behavior, 20, 1981, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newport, E.L. Task specificity in language learning? In E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman, eds., Language acquisition; state of the art. New York; Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport, E. L., Gleitman, H. and Gleitman, L. R., Mother, I’d rather do it myself; Some effects and noneffects of maternal speech style. In C. E. Snow and C. A. Ferguson, eds., Talking to children; Language input and acquisition, Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. A theory of the acquisition of lexical-functional grammars, MIT Center for Cognitive Science Occasional Papers, 6, 1980. Also to appear in J. Bresnan, ed., The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge; MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, C. and Schreiber, P., Why short subjects are harder to find than long ones, in E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman, eds., Language acquisition; The state of the art. New York; Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P. and Gleitman, L. R., The acquisition and structure of reading II; The reading process and the acquisition of the alphabetic principle. In A. Reber & D. Scarborough, eds., Toward a psychology of reading, Hillsdale, N.J.; Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankoff, G. and Laberge, S. On the acquisition of native speakers by a language, Kivung, 6, 1973, 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I. The acquisition of Russian as a native language. In. F. Smith & C. A. Miller, eds., The genesis of language; A psycholinguistic approach, Cambriddge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I., Paper read at the Conference on Syntactic Change, University of California at Santa Barbara, May 7–9,1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I., Language change in childhood and in history. In J. Macnamara, ed., Language learning and thought. New York: Academic Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I., Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman, eds., Language acquisition: The state of the art. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, J. M., Cooper, W. E., and Paccia, J. M. Speech timing of grammatical categories. Cognition, 4(2), 1978, 135–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. S. Perceptual knowledge of objects in infancy. In J. Mehler, M. F. Garrett & E. C. Walker, eds., Perspectives in mental representation, Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supalla, T., Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of California at San Diego, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venneman, T., An explanation of drift. In C. Li, ed., Word order and word order change, Austin: University of Texas Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, E. and Maratsos, M., An ATN approach to comprehension. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, and G. A. Miller, eds., Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, A. M. On clitics. Paper read at the Third International Phonologie-Tagung at the University of Vienna, Sept. 2, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gleitman, L.R., Wanner, E. (1984). Richly Specified Input to Language Learning. In: Selfridge, O.G., Rissland, E.L., Arbib, M.A. (eds) Adaptive Control of Ill-Defined Systems. NATO Conference Series, vol 16. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8941-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8941-5_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8943-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8941-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics